Cited by 22Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyGastrointestinal motility and disordersAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Reticulo-ruminal motility in cattle (Bos indicus) and water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) fed a low quality roughage diet

McSweeney, Christopher S, Kennedy, Peter M, John, Andrew·1989·Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Physiology

Abstract

1. The effect of A and B sequence contractions of the reticulo-rumen on passage rate of digesta was compared in buffaloes and cattle fed low quality rhodes grass. 2. Both species ate the same amount per unit body weight but buffaloes spent 53% more time ruminating than cattle. 3. Buffaloes had fewer A and B sequence contractions each day and the rate of these contractions during eating, ruminating and at rest were slower. 4. A larger pool of fine feed particles in the rumen of buffaloes, generated by extra ruminating activity was associated with the 30% shorter mean residence time of particulate matter in the forestomach compared with cattle. 5. It is concluded that the difference in the number and frequency of contractions between the species was insufficient to affect passage rate of digesta from the stomach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0300-9629(89)90607-5

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McSweeney, C. S., Kennedy, P. M., & John, A.
Affiliations
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Venue
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Physiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-01
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
635-638
ISSN
0300-9629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026212824
Cited by
22
References
37
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
rumen contractions, digesta passage rate, ruminating time, Rhodes grass, Bos indicus, water buffalo, cattle, species differences
MeSH terms
Animals, Buffaloes, Cattle, Dietary Fiber, Female, Gastrointestinal Motility, Gastrointestinal Transit, Reticulum, Rumen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review