The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of condensed tannins on the site of digestion of amino acids and other nutrients in sheep fed on Lotus corniculatus L
Open accessAbstract
1. Sheep were used to evaluate the nutritional consequences of a low condensed-tannin concentration (22 g/kg dry matter (DM)) in lotus (Lotus corniculatus L.) (control group) compared with lotus given to sheep receiving intraruminal polyethylene glycol (PEG) infusion (PEG group). PEG selectively binds to tannins and prevents tannins from binding proteins. 2. DM intakes (1430 (SE 28) g/d) and digestibility of energy (663 (SE 4.5) kJ/MJ intake) were similar for both groups but the apparent digestion of nitrogen was lower in the control sheep (0.70) than in the PEG sheep (0.78;P< 0.001). 3. The proportion of N apparently digested before the abomasum (i.e. in the rumen) was lower (P< 0.05) in control sheep (0.12) than in PEG sheep (0.21;P< 0.05). Rumen ammonia concentrations were lower (P< 0.001) in control sheep than in PEG sheep. The proportion of neutral-detergent fibre (NDF) digested in the rumen was similar for both groups (0.48 (SE 0.012)) but less energy was digested in the rumen of the control (0.42) than of the PEG sheep (0.47;P< 0.05). 4. The flux of essential amino acids (EAA) through the abomasum of control sheep was 50% greater than that in PEG sheep; flux of non-essential amino acids (NEAA) was 14% higher in control than in PEG sheep. Apparent digestibility of EAA in the small intestine was similar for both treatments (0.67), but NEAA were less well digested in the control (0.55) than in the PEG sheep (0.69). 5. The presence of tannins in the control group increased net apparent absorption of threonine (57%), valine (89%), isoleucine (94%), leucine (30%), tyrosine (41%), phenylalanine (93%), histidine (90%) and lysine (59%), and reduced NEAA absorption by 10%, compared with PEG sheep.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Min, B. R., Barry, T. N., Attwood, G. T., & McNabb, W. C. (2003) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(03)00041-5 · Cited by 1,051
Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health
Mueller‐Harvey, I. (2006) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2577 · Cited by 965
Microbial interactions with tannins: nutritional consequences for ruminants
McSweeney, C. S., Palmer, B., McNeill, D. M., & Krause, D. O. (2001) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(01)00232-2 · Cited by 780
The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats1
Puchala, R., Min, B. R., Goetsch, A. L., & Sahlu, T. (2005) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2005.831182x · Cited by 314
Grainger, C., Clarke, T., Auldist, M. J., Beauchemin, K. A., McGinn, S. M., Waghorn, G. C., & Eckard, R. J. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas08110 · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Waghorn, G. C., Ulyatt, M. J., John, A., & Fisher, M. T.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-126
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2142893271
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of condensed tannins on the site of digestion of amino acids and other nutrients in sheep fed on Lotus corniculatus L. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn19870015
- The paper
- Waghorn, G. C., Ulyatt, M. J., John, A., & Fisher, M. T. (1987). The effect of condensed tannins on the site of digestion of amino acids and other nutrients in sheep fed on Lotus corniculatus L. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19870015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.