The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats1
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare methane emission by goats consuming the condensed tannin-containing forage sericea lespedeza (Les-pedeza cuneata) or a mixture of crabgrass (Digitaria ischaemum) and Kentucky 31 tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Two groups of 12 Angora does (initial average BW = 41.5 +/- 2.7 kg) that previously grazed a pasture of sericea lespedeza or crabgrass/tall fescue for approximately 4 mo were used. After 1 wk of adaptation to metabolism cages, gas exchange was measured for 24 h in an open-circuit respiration calorimetry system with four head boxes. Forage harvested daily from the previously grazed pastures was consumed ad libitum. Crude protein concentration was 10.3 and 13.0%, IVDMD was 64.5 and 75.3%, and the level of condensed tannins was 17.7 and 0.5% for sericea lespedeza and crabgrass/tall fescue, respectively. Dry matter intake (1.11 vs. 0.67 kg/d) and digestible DMI (estimated from IVDMD; 0.71 vs. 0.51 kg/d) were greater (P < 0.01) for sericea lespedeza than for crabgrass/tall fescue. Ruminal ammonia N (3.7 and 9.9 mg/dL; P < 0.001) and plasma urea-N concentrations (16.7 and 20.9 mg/dL; P = 0.07) were lower for sericea lespedeza than for crabgrass/tall fescue. Concentrations of individual and total VFA and the acetate-to-propionate ratio in ruminal fluid did not differ between treatments (P > 0.19). Despite higher DMI by goats fed sericea lespedeza, daily energy expenditure (409 vs. 431 kJ/kg BW(0.75)), heart rate (70 vs. 73 beats/min), and the ratio of energy expenditure to heart rate (5.82 vs. 5.94) did not differ between sericea lespedeza and crabgrass/tall fescue, respectively (P > 0.13). Methane emission expressed as both quantity per day or relative to DMI was lower (P <0.001) for sericea lespedeza than for crabgrass/tall fescue (7.4 vs. 10.6 g/d and 6.9 vs. 16.2 g/kg DMI). Substantial differences between the forages in condensed tannins concentration and methane emission by Angora goats suggest that condensed tannins decreased methane emission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Official Methods of Analysis of
(1980) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50052a726 · Cited by 59,330
Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant
Van Soest, P. J. (1994) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9781501732355 · Cited by 7,312
Modified Reagents for Determination of Urea and Ammonia
Chaney, A. L., & Marbach, E. P. (1962) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/8.2.130 · Cited by 3,938
Johnson, K. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7382483x · Cited by 2,714
Min, B. R., Barry, T. N., Attwood, G. T., & McNabb, W. C. (2003) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(03)00041-5 · Cited by 1,051
Self-citationTerrill, T. H., Rowan, A. M., Douglas, G. B., & Barry, T. N. (1992) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740580306 · Cited by 781
The implications of condensed tannins on the nutritive value of temperate forages fed to ruminants
Barry, T. N., & McNabb, W. C. (1999) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114599000501 · Cited by 616
Waghorn, G. C., Ulyatt, M. J., John, A., & Fisher, M. T. (1987) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19870015 · Cited by 384
Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: A modelling approach
Benchaar, C., Pomar, C., & Chiquette, J. (2001) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/a00-119 · Cited by 288
Barry, T. N., & Duncan, S. J. (1984) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19840054 · Cited by 282
Cited by
Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health
Mueller‐Harvey, I. (2006) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2577 · Cited by 965
The role of microbes in rumen lipolysis and biohydrogenation and their manipulation
Lourenço, M., Ramos-Morales, E., & Wallace, R. J. (2010) · animal · doi:10.1017/s175173111000042x · Cited by 401
Methane mitigation from ruminants using tannins and saponins
Goel, G., & Makkar, H. P. S. (2012) · Tropical Animal Health and Production · doi:10.1007/s11250-011-9966-2 · Cited by 336
Grainger, C., Clarke, T., Auldist, M. J., Beauchemin, K. A., McGinn, S. M., Waghorn, G. C., & Eckard, R. J. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas08110 · Cited by 293
Patra, A. K. (2012) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2090-y · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Puchala, R., Min, B. R., Goetsch, A. L., & Sahlu, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 182-186
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W1583995915
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 22.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/2005.831182x
- The paper
- Puchala, R., Min, B. R., Goetsch, A. L., & Sahlu, T. (2005). The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats1. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.831182x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.