Cited by 238Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyHelminth infection and controlAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Influence of foliage from African multipurpose trees on activity of rumen protozoa and bacteria

Open access
Newbold, C.J, El Hassan, S. M., Wang*, J, Ortega, M.E, Wallace, R.J·1997·British Journal Of Nutrition

Abstract

Samples and extracts of foliage from African multipurpose trees were screened for their effects on rumen protozoa and bacteria with a view to predicting their safety as feed supplements and for identifying species with potential antiprotozoal activity. The species tested were Acacia aneura, Chamaecytisus palmensis, Brachychiton populneum, Flindersia maculosa, Sesbania sesban, Leucaena leucocephala and Vernonia amyedalina. Antimicrobial effects were mild except for S. sesban, which was highly toxic to rumen protozoa in vitro, and A. aneura, which was toxic to rumen bacteria. The antiprotozoal factor in S. sesban was apparently associated with the fraction of the plant containing saponins. When S. sesban was fed to sheep, protozoal numbers fell by 60% after 4 d, but the population recovered after a further 10 d. In vitro experiments demonstrated that washed protozoa from later times were no more resistant to S. sesban than on initial exposure, suggesting that other micro-organisms, probably the bacteria, adapted to detoxify the antiprotozoal agent. Thus S. sesban may be useful in suppressing protozoa and thereby improving protein flow from the rumen, but only if the bacterial metabolism of the antiprotozoal factor can be avoided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn19970143

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 238

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Committee (1987). Genstat 5 Users' Manual. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Lowry, J. B. (1990). Toxic factors and problems: methods of alleviating them in animals. In Shrubs and Tree Fodders for Farm Animals. Proceedings of a Workshop held in Denpsar, Indonesia, 24-29 July 1989, pp. 76- 90
  3. Stem, M. D. & Hinkson, R. S. (1974). Effect of defamation and faunation on intraruminal factors. Journal of Animal Science 39, 253 Abstr.

Authors
Newbold, C. J., El Hassan, S. M., Wang*, J., Ortega, M. E., & Wallace, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Venue
British Journal Of Nutrition
Published
1997-08
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
237-249
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2079457708
Cited by
238
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
rumen protozoa, rumen bacteria, antiprotozoal activity, Sesbania sesban, saponins, Acacia aneura, Chamaecytisus palmensis, Leucaena leucocephala, Vernonia amygdalina, feed supplements, sheep, antimicrobial activity
MeSH terms
Africa, Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Antiprotozoal Agents, Bacteria, Rumen, Sheep, Trees, Colony Count, Microbial, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review