The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compared effects of three oligosaccharides on metabolism of intestinal microflora in rats inoculated with a human faecal flora
Open accessAbstract
Using germ-free rats inoculated with a human faecal flora (gnotobiotic rats), the effects of three oligosaccharides (β-fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), β-galacto-oligosaccharides (TOS) and α-gluco-oligosaccharides (GOS)) on intestinal bacterial metabolism were compared. The animals were fed on either a control diet or diets containing 4Og/kg of GOS, FOS or TOS. FOS and TOS were the preferred growth substrates for Bifidobacteria which increased in number by 2 log values in faeces of rats when compared with rats fed on GOS or control diets. Ingestion of TOS specifically induced hydrolysis of the substrate, and did not modify the activity of any other enzymes measured in the caecum. GOS led to a non-specific enzymic induction of β-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23), β-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21) and α-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.20) activities whereas β-glucuronidase (EC 3.2.1.31) was lowered. Compared with the control group, FOS and TOS diets led to a significant increase in H 2 and CH 4 excretion; the GOS diet increased only CH 4. Analysis of caecal contents revealed a decrease in pH for all diets compared with controls. Total short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentration increased significantly in all groups, but the SCFA profile differed between treatment groups. It was concluded that the three oligosaccharides studied had different effects which may be linked to their chemical structure. Some of these effects may be beneficial to human health
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factors Affecting Metabolic Activity of the Intestinal Microflora
Rowland, I. R. (1988) · Drug Metabolism Reviews · doi:10.3109/03602538808994135 · Cited by 84
Cited by
Walker, A. W., Duncan, S. H., McWilliam Leitch, E. C., Child, M. W., & Flint, H. J. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.7.3692-3700.2005 · Cited by 796
Mountzouris, K. C., Tsirtsikos, P., Kalamara, E., Nitsch, S., Schatzmayr, G., & Fegeros, K. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.2.309 · Cited by 632
Review article: dietary fibre-microbiota interactions
Simpson, H. L., & Campbell, B. J. (2015) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.13248 · Cited by 602
Nondigestible carbohydrates, butyrate, and butyrate-producing bacteria
Fu, X., Liu, Z., Zhu, C., Mou, H., & Kong, Q. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2018.1542587 · Cited by 497
Effects of prebiotics on mineral metabolism
Scholz-Ahrens, K. E., Schaafsma, G., van den Heuvel, E. G., & Schrezenmeir, J. (2001) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/73.2.459s · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Djouzi, Z., & Andlueux, C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 313-324
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2090037571
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compared effects of three oligosaccharides on metabolism of intestinal microflora in rats inoculated with a human faecal flora. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn19970149
- The paper
- Djouzi, Z., & Andlueux, C. (1997). Compared effects of three oligosaccharides on metabolism of intestinal microflora in rats inoculated with a human faecal flora. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19970149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.