The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbohydrate fractions of legumes: uses in human nutrition and potential for health
Open accessAbstract
Starch and fibre can be extracted, using wet or dry processes, from a variety of grain legumes and used as ingredients for food. a-Galactosides can be isolated during wet processes from the soluble extract. Starch isolates or concentrates are mostly produced from peas, whereas dietary fibre fractions from peas and soyabean are commercially available. The physico-chemical characteristics of fibre fractions very much depend on their origin, outer fibres being very cellulosic whereas inner fibres contain a majority of pectic substances. Inner fibres are often used as texturing agents whereas outer fibres find their main uses in bakery and extruded products, where they can be introduced to increase the fibre content of the food. Most investigations on impacts on health have been performed on soyabean fibres. When positive observations were made on lipaemia, glucose tolerance or faecal excretion, they were unfortunately often obtained after non-realistic daily doses of fibres. Legume starches contain a higher amount of amylose than most cereal or tuber starches. This confers these starches a lower bioavailability than that of most starches, when raw or retrograded. Their low glycaemic index can be considered as beneficial for health and especially for the prevention of diseases related to insulin resistance. When partly retrograded, these starches can provide significant amount of butyrate to the colonic epithelium and may help in colon cancer prevention. a-Galactosides are usually considered as responsible for flatus but their apparent prebiotic effects may be an opportunity to valorize these oligosaccharides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food properties affecting the digestion and absorption of carbohydrates
Björck, I., Granfeldt, Y., Liljeberg, H., Tovar, J., & Asp, N. (1994) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/59.3.699s · Cited by 398
Cited by
Review of the health benefits of peas ( Pisum sativum L.)
Dahl, W. J., Foster, L. M., & Tyler, R. T. (2012) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114512000852 · Cited by 434
Technological, processing and nutritional aspects of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) - A review
Kaur, R., & Prasad, K. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.044 · Cited by 275
Yang, T., Liu, R., Luo, Y., Hu, S., Wang, D., Wang, C., Pandey, M. K., Ge, S., Xu, Q., Li, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01172-2 · Cited by 191
Middelbos, I. S., & Fahey, G. C. (2008) · Soybeans · doi:10.1016/b978-1-893997-64-6.50012-3 · Cited by 36
Kahraman, K., Yuksel, F., & Karaman, S. (2026) · European Food Research and Technology · doi:10.1007/s00217-025-04999-1 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Guillon, F., & Champ, M. M.-J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- S3
- Pages
- 293-306
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2093547860
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbohydrate fractions of legumes: uses in human nutrition and potential for health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn2002720
- The paper
- Guillon, F., & Champ, M. M.-J. (2002). Carbohydrate fractions of legumes: uses in human nutrition and potential for health. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn2002720
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.