Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fructans in the diet cause alterations of intestinal mucosal architecture, released mucins and mucosa-associated bifidobacteria in gnotobiotic rats

Open access
Kleessen, Brigitta, Hartmann, Ludger, Blaut, Michael·2003·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

The effects of fructans in the diet on the mucosal morphometry (height of villi, depth of the crypts, number of goblet cells), the thickness of the epithelial mucus layer and the histochemical composition of intestinal mucosubstances in the distal jejunum and the distal colon were investigated by comparing germ-free (GF) rats, rats harbouring Bacteroides vulgatus and Bifidobacterium longum(diassociated (DA) rats), and rats with a human faecal flora (HFA). The rats were fed either a commercial standard diet (ST) or ST + (50 g oligofructose (OF)–long-chain inulin (lcIN))/kg. Changes in total bacteria, bifidobacteria and Bacteroides–Prevotella in response to feeding these diets were investigated by fluorescent in situ hybridization with 16S rRNA-targeted probes both in intestinal contents (lumen bacteria) and tissue sections (mucosa-associated bacteria). The OF–lcIN-containing diet resulted in higher villi and deeper crypts in bacteria-associated, but not in GF rats. In DA and HFA rats, the colonic epithelial mucus layer was thicker and the numbers of the goblet cells were greater than in GF rats. These effects were enhanced by the OF–lcIN-containing diet. In both dietary groups, bacterial colonization of GF rats caused an increase in neutral mucins in the distal jejunum and colon. Bacteria-associated rats had more acidic mucins in the colon than GF rats, and the OF–lcIN-containing diet stimulated sulfomucins as the predominant type of acidic mucins, while sialomucins dominated in the ST-fed groups. The number of mucosa-associated bifidobacteria detected in the colon of DA and HFA rats was greater with OF–lcIN than ST (4·9 and 5·4 v. 3·5 and 4·0 log 10/mm 2 mucosal surface respectively), whereas the number of luminal bifidobacteria was only affected by fructans in DA rats.Bacteroides did not differ between the groups. The stabilisation of the gut mucosal barrier, either by changes in the mucosal architecture itself, in released mucins or by stimulation of mucosal bifidobacteria with fructans, could become an important topic in the treatment and prophylaxis of gastrointestinal disorders and health maintenance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn2002827

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Kleessen, B., Hartmann, L., & Blaut, M.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2003-05
Volume
89
Issue
5
Pages
597-606
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2115219265
Cited by
221
References
1
FWCI
8.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fructans in the diet cause alterations of intestinal mucosal architecture, released mucins and mucosa-associated bifidobacteria in gnotobiotic rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn2002827
The paper
Kleessen, B., Hartmann, L., & Blaut, M. (2003). Fructans in the diet cause alterations of intestinal mucosal architecture, released mucins and mucosa-associated bifidobacteria in gnotobiotic rats. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn2002827

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.