The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining and identifying crop landraces
Open accessAbstract
Awareness of the need for biodiversity conservation is now universally accepted, but most often recent conservation activities have focused on wild species. Crop species and the diversity between and within them has significant socioeconomic as well as heritage value. The bulk of genetic diversity in domesticated species is located in traditional varieties maintained by traditional farming systems. These traditional varieties, commonly referred to as landraces, are severely threatened by genetic extinction primarily due to their replacement by modern genetically uniform varieties. The conservation of landrace diversity has been hindered in part by the lack of an accepted definition to define the entity universally recognized as landraces. Without a definition it would be impossible to prepare an inventory and without an inventory changes in landrace constituency could not be recognized over time. Therefore, based on a literature review, workshop discussion and interviews with key informants, common characteristics of landraces were identified, such as: historical origin, high genetic diversity, local genetic adaptation, recognizable identity, lack of formal genetic improvement, and whether associated with traditional farming systems. However, although these characteristics are commonly present they are not always all present for any individual landrace; several crop-specific exceptions were noted relating to crop propagation method (sexual or asexual), breeding system (self-fertilized or cross-fertilized species), length of formal crop improvement, seed management (selection or random propagation) and use. This paper discusses the characteristics that generally constitute a landrace, reviews the exceptions to these characteristics and provides a working definition of a landrace. The working definition proposed is as follows: ‘a landrace is a dynamic population(s) of a cultivated plant that has historical origin, distinct identity and lacks formal crop improvement, as well as often being genetically diverse, locally adapted and associated with traditional farming systems’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ALLARD, R. W. (1961) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196106000-00017 · Cited by 1,710
Jain, S. K. (1982) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05062.x · Cited by 1,469
Harlan, J. R. (1975) · Cited by 1,085
(1992) · doi:10.2135/1992.cropsandman · Cited by 750
Principles of crop improvement
Simmonds, N. W. (1979) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 676
Landraces: A review of definitions and classifications
Zeven, A. C. (1998) · Euphytica · doi:10.1023/a:1018683119237 · Cited by 636
Ho, M. W. (1982) · Endeavour · doi:10.1016/0160-9327(82)90110-7 · Cited by 572
Genetic resources in plants-their exploration and conservation.
Frankel, O. H., & Bennett, E. L. (1970) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 528
In Situ Conservation of Landraces in Centers of Crop Diversity
Brush, S. B. (1995) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183x003500020009x · Cited by 475
Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow
S., F. A., Frankel, O. H., & Hawkes, J. G. (1975) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1220749 · Cited by 438
Cited by
Crop genetic erosion: understanding and responding to loss of crop diversity
Khoury, C. K., Brush, S., Costich, D. E., Curry, H. A., de Haan, S., Engels, J. M. M., Guarino, L., Hoban, S., Mercer, K. L., Miller, A. J., et al. (2022) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17733 · Cited by 471
Seed exchange networks for agrobiodiversity conservation. A review
Pautasso, M., Aistara, G., Barnaud, A., Caillon, S., Clouvel, P., Coomes, O. T., Delêtre, M., Demeulenaere, E., De Santis, P., Döring, T., et al. (2013) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-012-0089-6 · Cited by 259
Maize landraces and adaptation to climate change in Mexico
Hellin, J., Bellon, M. R., & Hearne, S. J. (2014) · Journal of Crop Improvement · doi:10.1080/15427528.2014.921800 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Villa, T. C. C., Maxted, N., Scholten, M., & Ford-Lloyd, B.
- Venue
- Plant Genetic Resources
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 373-384
- ISSN
- 1479-2621 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-263X
- OpenAlex
- W2132584822
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining and identifying crop landraces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/pgr200591
- The paper
- Villa, T. C. C., Maxted, N., Scholten, M., & Ford-Lloyd, B. (2005). Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genetic Resources. https://doi.org/10.1079/pgr200591
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.