Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 636

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Landraces: A review of definitions and classifications

Open access
Zeven, A.C.·1998·Euphytica
DOI 10.1023/a:1018683119237
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1018683119237

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Anderson, E. & H. Cutler, 1942. Races of Zea mays. I. Their recognition and classification. Ann Missouri Botanical Garden 21: 69-88. · doi:10.2307/2394331
  2. Astley, D., 1991. Exploration: methods and problems of exploration and field collecting, pp. 11-22. In: J.G. Hawkes (Ed.), 1991. Genetic conservation of world crop plants. Academic Press. 87 pp. Also issued as Biol Journal of Linnean Society 43, no. 1. · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00579.x
  3. Baur, E., 1914. Die Bedeutung der primitive Kulturrassen und der wilden Verwandten unserer Kulturpflanzen für die Pflanzenzuchtung. Jahrb Deutschen Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft 29: 104- 110.
  4. Bellon, M.R. & S.B. Brush, 1994. Keepers of maize in Chiapas, Mexico. Econ Bot 48: 196-209. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Berg, T., 1993. The science of plant breeding - support or alternative to traditional practices? pp. 72-77. In: W.K. de Boef & lK. Wellard (Eds.), Cultivating knowledge. Genetic diversity, farmer experimentation and crop research. London. 206 pp.
  6. Bisson, J., 1989. Les Messiles, groupe ampélographique du Bassin de la Loire. Connaissance de la Vigne et du Vin. J Intern Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 23: 175-191, see Levadoux (1948).
  7. Boursiquot, J.-M., 1990. Evolution de l'encépagemant du vignoble français au cours des trente dernières années. Progrès Agricole et Viticole 107: 15-20.
  8. Bowers, J.E., E.B. Bandman & C.P. Meredith, 1993. DNA fingerprint characterization of some wine grape cultivars. Amer J Enol Vitic 44: 266-274. · doi:10.5344/ajev.1993.44.3.266
  9. Brown, A.H.D., 1978. Isozymes, plant population genetics structure and genetic conservation. Theor Appl Genet 52: 145-157. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Camussi, A., 1979. Numerical taxonomy of Italian populations of maize based on quantitative trait. Maydica 24: 161-174.
  11. Ceccarelli, S., 1994. Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions, pp. 101-127. In: O.A. Rognli, E. Solberg & I. Schjelderup (Eds.), Breeding fodder crops for marginal conditions. Dordrecht. 329 pp. · DOI
  12. Christiansen-Weniger, F., 1931. Bericht über eine Studienreise durch das ostanatolische Hochland. Zeitschr Züchtung A Pflanzenzüchtung 18: 73-108.
  13. Cleveland, D.A., D. Soleri & S.E. Smith, 1994. Folk crop varieties: do they have a role in sustainable agriculture? BioScience 44: 740-751. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dennis, J.V., 1987. Farmer management of rice variety diversity in northern Thailand. PhD dissertation. Cornell University, Michigan University Microfilms print, Ann Arbor 367 pp.
  15. Ehdaie, B. & J.G. Waines, 1989. Adaptation of landrace and improved spring wheat genotypes to stress environments. J Genet Breed 43: 151-156.
  16. Falcinelli, M., L. Russi, V. Negri & F. Veronesi, 1994. Variation within improved cultivars and landraces of lucerne in Central Italy, pp. 81-87. In: O.A. Rognli, E. Stolberg & I. Schjelderup (Eds.), Breeding fodder crops for marginal conditions. Dordrecht. 329 pp. · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0966-6_8
  17. Frankel, O.H. & M.E. Soulé, 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge. 327 pp.
  18. Fruwirth, C., 1928. Zur Frage der Erhaltung unserer Landsorten. (On the question of maintenance of our landraces). Pflanzenbau 5: 157-158.
  19. Goodman, M.M. & W.L. Brown, 1988. Races of corn, pp. 39-79. In: G.F. Sprague & J.W. Dudley. Corn and corn improvement. Madison. 986 pp.
  20. Harlan, J.R., 1951. Anatomy of gene centers. Amer Nat 85: 97-103. · doi:10.1086/281657
  21. Harlan, J.R., 1975. Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188: 618-621. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hawkes, J.G., 1983. The diversity of crop plants. Cambridge/ London. 184 pp. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hawkes, J.G., 1991. The importance of genetic resources in plant breeding, pp. 3-10. In: J.G. Hawkes (Ed.). Genetic conservation of world crop plants. Academic Press. 87 pp. Also issued as Biol Journal of Linnean Society 43, no. 1. · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00578.x
  24. Kiessling, H., 1912. Die züchterische Bearbeitung der Landsorten in Bayern. Beiträge zur Pflanzenzücht 2: 74-96.
  25. Kuckuck, H., G. Kobabe & G. Wenzel, 1991. Fundamentals of plant breeding. Springer Verlag. 236 pp. · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75392-3
  26. La Barre, W., 1974. Potato taxonomy among the Aymara indians of Bolivia. Acta Americana 5: 83-103.
  27. Lehmann, Ch.O., 1981. Collecting European land-races and development of European gene banks - historical remarks. Die Kulturpflanze 29: 29-40. · DOI
  28. Lehmann, Ch.O., 1990. Hundert Jahre Sammlung und Nutzung von Landsorten, pp. 10-22. In: Gemeinsames Kolloquium: Sicherung und Nutzbarmachung pflanzengenetischer Ressourcen. Braunschweig/Gatersleben. 142 pp.
  29. Leng, E.R., A. Tavcar & V. Trifunovic, 1962. Maize of Southeastern Europa and its potential value in breeding programs elsewhere. Euphytica 11: 263-272. · doi:10.1007/bf00031978
  30. Lester, R.N. & E. Bekele, 1981. Amino acid composition of the cereal tef and related species of Eragrostis(Gramineae). Cereal Chem 58: 113-115.
  31. Levadoux, L., 1948. Les cépages à raisins de cuve. Bull Off Int Vin 21 (203): 39-45, cited by Bisson, 1989.
  32. Louette, D., A. Charrier & J. Berthaud, 1997. In situconservation of maize in Mexico: genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Econ Bot 51: 20-38. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Mansholt, U.J., 1909. Van Pesch Plantenteelt, beknopte handleiding tot de kennis van den Nederlandschen landbouw. 3rd revised edition, pt 2. Plantenteelt. Zwolle. 228 pp.
  34. Martin, G. & M.W. Adams, 1987. Landraces of Phaseolus vulgarisin Northern Malawi. I. Regional variation. Econ Bot 41: 190- 203. · doi:10.1007/bf02858965
  35. Mayr, E., 1934. Die Bedeutung der alpinen Getreidelandsorten für die Pflanzenzüchtung and Stammesforschung mit besonderer Beschreibung der Landsorten in Nordtirol und Vorarlberg. Zeitsch f Züchtung A: Pflanzenzüchtung 19: 195-228.
  36. Mayr, E., 1935. Ueber wissenschaftliche und praktische Ergebnisse der alpinen Landsortenforschung. Forschung und Fortschritt 11: 376-378.
  37. Mayr, E., 1937. Alpine Landsorten in ihrer Bedeutung für die praktische Züchtung. Forschungsdienst 4: 162-166.
  38. Negrul, A.M., 1946. Evropyljsky i aziatsky vinograd Vitis viniferaL. Ampelografiya S.S.S.R., Moskoa 1: 63, cited by Bisson, 1989.
  39. Nüesch, D., 1976. Untersuchungen und Beobachtungen an Hofsorten des Schweizer Mattenklee. Schweiz Landwirt Forschung 15: 401-410.
  40. Oldfield, M.L. & J.B. Alcorn, 1987. Conservation of traditional agroecosystems. · DOI
  41. Percival, J., 1921. The wheat plant. A monograph. London. 473 pp. · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.25683
  42. Prospéri, J.M., F. Demarquet, M. Angevain & P. Mansat, 1994. Evaluation agronomique de variétés de pays de sainfoin (Onobrychis sativaL.) originaires du sud-est de la France. Agronomie 14: 285-298. · doi:10.1051/agro:19940502
  43. Rieger, R., A. Michaelis & M.M. Green, 1991. Glossary of genetics. Classical and molecular. 5th edition. Springer-Verlag. 553. · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75333-6
  44. Rümker, K. von, 1908. Die systematische Einteilung und Benennung der Getreidesorten für praktische Zwecke. Jahrbuch der Deutschen landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft 23: 137-167.
  45. Schindler, J., 1918. Einige Bemerkungen über die züchterische und wirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Landrassen unserer Kulturpflanzen. Deutsche Landwirt. Presse 45 (25): 155-156.
  46. Sevilla, R., 1994. Variation in modern Andean maize and its implications for prehistoric patterns, pp. 219-244. In: S. Johannessen & Chr.A. Hastorf. 1994. Corn and culture in the prehistoric New World. Westview Press. 623 pp.
  47. Soleri, D. & S.E. Smith, 1995. Morphological and phenological comparisons of two Hopi maize varieties conserved in situand ex situ. Econ Bot 49: 56-77. · DOI
  48. Teshome, A., B.R. Baum, L. Fahrig, J.K. Torrance, T.J. Arnason & J.D. Lambert, 1997. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench) landrace variation and classification in North Shewa and South Welo, Ethiopia. Euphytica 97: 255-263. · doi:10.1023/a:1003074008785
  49. Tschermak, E., 1912. Zur Entstehung der Landsorten. Deutsche Landwirtschaftliche Presse 39 (40): 470.
  50. Voss, J., 1992. Conserving and increasing on-farm genetic diversity: farmer management of varietal bean mixtures in Central Africa, pp. 34-51. In: J.L. Moock & R.E. Rhoades (Eds.), Diversity, farmer knowledge and sustainability. Cornell Univ Press. 278 pp. · DOI
  51. Worthington, C.B. (Ed.), 1975. The evolution of IBP-International Biological Programme. Cambridge Univ Press. 268 pp.
  52. Zeven, A.C., 1979. Collecting genetic resources in highly industrialized Europe, especially the Netherlands, pp. 49-58. In: A.C. Zeven & A.M. van Harten (Eds.), Proc of the Conference Broadening the Genetic Base of Crops, Wageningen-1978. Wageningen. 347 pp.
  53. Zeven, A.C., 1986. Landrace groups of bread wheat (Triticum aestivumL. em. Thell.). Acta Hortic 182: 365-375. · doi:10.17660/actahortic.1986.182.45
  54. Zeven, A.C., 1991. Four hundred years of cultivation of Dutch white clover landraces. Euphytica 54: 93-99. · doi:10.1007/bf00145635
  55. Zeven, A.C., 1996. Results of activities to maintain landraces and other material in some European countries in situbefore 1945 and what we may learn from them. Genet Res Crop Evol 43: 337-341. · DOI
  56. Zeven, A.C., 1997. The introduction of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgarisL.) intoWestern Europe and the phenotypic variation of dry beans collected in the Netherlands in dy1946. Euphytica 94: 319-328. · doi:10.1023/a:1002940220241
  57. Zeven, A.C., in preparation. The traditional 'irrational' change of seed and seed ware of landraces and cultivars: a review.
  58. Zeven, A.C. & R. Schachl, 1989. Groups of bread wheat landraces in Austrian alps. Euphytica 41: 235-246. · doi:10.1007/bf00022411

Cited by

See all 636

Metadata

Authors
Zeven, A. C.
Venue
Euphytica
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1998-12
Volume
104
Issue
2
Pages
127-139
ISSN
  • 0014-2336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5060
DOI
10.1023/a:1018683119237
OpenAlex
W2099315637
Cited by
636
References
0
FWCI
15.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Landraces: A review of definitions and classifications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1018683119237
The paper
Zeven, A. C. (1998). Landraces: A review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1018683119237

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.