Physical activity interventions in the prevention and treatment of paediatric obesity: systematic review and critical appraisal
Open accessAbstract
Interventions for prevention and treatment of childhood obesity typically target increases in physical activity and, more recently, reductions in physical inactivity (sedentary behaviour such as television viewing). However, the evidence base for such strategies is extremely limited. The main aim of the present review was to update the systematic review and critical appraisal of evidence in the light of the recent rapid expansion of research in this area. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) that targeted activity or inactivity, that followed up children or adolescents for at least 1 year and that included an objective weight-related outcome measure were included. Trials were appraised using previously published criteria (Harbour & Miller, 2001), and literature search strategies described previously (Reillyet al. 2002) were updated to May 2002. A total of four new RCT, two new systematic reviews and one meta-analysis were identified. The evidence base has increased markedly since the completion of earlier reviews, although high-quality evidence is still lacking. The evidence on childhood obesity prevention is not encouraging, although promising targets for prevention are now clear, notably reduction in sedentary behaviour. There is stronger evidence that targeting activity and/or inactivity might be effective in paediatric obesity treatment, but doubts as to the generalisability of existing interventions, and the clinical relevance of the interventions is unclear. Further research in settings outside the USA is urgently needed, and two ongoing RCT in Scotland are summarised.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The findings of this update are consistent with reviews by Flynn 2006, Reilly 2003, Thomas 2004a, and Waters 2011, which reported mixed results for interventions to prevent obesity, promote healthy eating, and promote physical activity in children and adolescents.
“The findings of this update are consistent with the findings of reviews conducted by Flynn 2006, Reilly 2003, Thomas 2004a, and Waters 2011, who reported mixed results regarding the effectiveness of interventions to prevent obesity, promote healthy eating, and promote physical activity in children and adolescents.”
From School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 (2013) · cites this paper as Reilly 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 150
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Dorosty AR (2001) Epidemiology of childhood obesity. PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow.
- Gregory JR, Collins DL, Davies PSW, Hughes JM & Clarke PC (1995) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Children Aged 1•5 to 4•5 Years. vol. 1, Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey. London: H. M. Stationery Office.
- Jackson DM, Reilly JJ, Kelly LA, Montgomery C, Grant S & Paton JY (2002) Objectively measured habitual physical activity and inactivity in a representative sample of 3-4 year old children. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 61, 154A.
- Montgomery C, Kelly LA, Jackson DM, Reilly JJ, Grant S & Paton JY (2002) Changes in total energy expenditure in a represent- ative sample of young children: cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 61, 160A.
- Muller MJ, Asbeck I, Mast M, Langnasek K & Grand A (2001) Prevention of obesity -more than a concept. International Journal of Obesity 25, Suppl. 1, s66-s74.
- Reilly JJ, Methven E, Kelnar CJH, Hacking B & Alexander D (2003) Consequences of obesity: results of a systematic review and evidence appraisal. Archives of Disease in Childhood (In the Press).
- Authors
- Reilly, J. J., & McDowell, Z. C.
- Affiliations
- Royal Hospital for Children (GB)
- Corresponding author
- McDowell, Zoe C.
- ORCID
- Reilly, John J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 611-619
- ISSN
- 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2719
- OpenAlex
- W4213102900
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of The Nutrition Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- British Heart Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
- Keywords
- childhood obesity, childhood obesity prevention, pediatric obesity treatment, physical activity interventions, sedentary behavior, television viewing, physical inactivity, weight-related outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review