School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Physical activity among children and adolescents is associated with lower adiposity, improved cardio-metabolic health, and improved fitness. Worldwide, fewer than 30% of children and adolescents meet global physical activity recommendations of at least 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per day. Schools may be ideal sites for interventions given that children and adolescents in most parts of the world spend a substantial amount of time in transit to and from school or attending school. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review update is to summarise the evidence on effectiveness of school-based interventions in increasing moderate to vigorous physical activity and improving fitness among children and adolescents 6 to 18 years of age. Specific objectives are: • to evaluate the effects of school-based interventions on increasing physical activity and improving fitness among children and adolescents; • to evaluate the effects of school-based interventions on improving body composition; and • to determine whether certain combinations or components (or both) of school-based interventions are more effective than others in promoting physical activity and fitness in this target population. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, BIOSIS, SPORTDiscus, and Sociological Abstracts to 1 June 2020, without language restrictions. We screened reference lists of included articles and relevant systematic reviews. We contacted primary authors of studies to ask for additional information. SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible interventions were relevant to public health practice (i.e. were not delivered by a clinician), were implemented in the school setting, and aimed to increase physical activity among all school-attending children and adolescents (aged 6 to 18) for at least 12 weeks. The review was limited to randomised controlled trials. For this update, we have added two new criteria: the primary aim of the study was to increase physical activity or fitness, and the study used an objective measure of physical activity or fitness. Primary outcomes included proportion of participants meeting physical activity guidelines and duration of moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary time (new to this update). Secondary outcomes included measured body mass index (BMI), physical fitness, health-related quality of life (new to this update), and adverse events (new to this update). Television viewing time, blood cholesterol, and blood pressure have been removed from this update. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent review authors used standardised forms to assess each study for relevance, to extract data, and to assess risk of bias. When discrepancies existed, discussion occurred until consensus was reached. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to GRADE. A random-effects meta-analysis based on the inverse variance method was conducted with participants stratified by age (children versus adolescents) when sufficient data were reported. Subgroup analyses explored effects by intervention type. MAIN RESULTS: Based on the three new inclusion criteria, we excluded 16 of the 44 studies included in the previous version of this review. We screened an additional 9968 titles (search October 2011 to June 2020), of which 978 unique studies were potentially relevant and 61 met all criteria for this update. We included a total of 89 studies representing complete data for 66,752 study participants. Most studies included children only (n = 56), followed by adolescents only (n = 22), and both (n = 10); one study did not report student age. Multi-component interventions were most common (n = 40), followed by schooltime physical activity (n = 19), enhanced physical education (n = 15), and before and after school programmes (n = 14); one study explored both enhanced physical education and an after school programme. Lack of blinding of participants, personnel, and outcome assessors and loss to follow-up were the most common sources of bias. Results show that school-based physical activity interventions probably result in little to no increase in time engaged in moderate to vigorous physical activity (mean difference (MD) 0.73 minutes/d, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 1.30; 33 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and may lead to little to no decrease in sedentary time (MD -3.78 minutes/d, 95% CI -7.80 to 0.24; 16 studies; low-certainty evidence). School-based physical activity interventions may improve physical fitness reported as maximal oxygen uptake (VO₂max) (MD 1.19 mL/kg/min, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.82; 13 studies; low-certainty evidence). School-based physical activity interventions may result in a very small decrease in BMI z-scores (MD -0.06, 95% CI -0.09 to -0.02; 21 studies; low-certainty evidence) and may not impact BMI expressed as kg/m² (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.01; 50 studies; low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain whether school-based physical activity in
AI snapshot
Written from a shortened version of the paper’s full text (it is longer than we read).
TL;DR
This updated Cochrane review of 44 RCTs (36,593 participants) found school-based physical activity interventions had mixed, generally modest effects on children’s physical activity and fitness. The evidence was graded low quality and likely overestimates true treatment effects.
Key findings
- Behavioral outcomes were mixed: 2 of 5 studies reported significant positive effects on physical activity rates, 14 of 23 on duration of MVPA, and 7 of 16 on television viewing (with 1 favoring control). Simon 2004 found intervention children were almost three times more likely to be active outside school (OR 2.74, 95% CI 2.01 to 3.75); Robinson 1999 reported a 50-minute/day decrease in TV viewing versus 10 minutes/day in controls (P < 0.001).
- Physical health outcomes showed limited positive effects: 4 of 16 studies for systolic blood pressure, 3 of 16 for diastolic blood pressure, 1 of 10 for cholesterol, 8 of 32 for BMI, 4 of 6 for VO₂max, and 1 of 6 for pulse rate. BMI intervention groups gained 0.1 to 1.0 kg/m² less than controls; VO₂max improvements ranged from 1.6 to 3.7 mL/kg/min.
- The review’s GRADE ratings for main outcomes were low quality. Longer interventions and combinations of school curricula, printed educational materials, educational sessions, physical activity sessions, and community-based strategies were suggested as potentially effective, but effects were modest.
Methods
- Systematic review of randomized controlled trials; inclusion required a school-based intervention relevant to public health practice, aimed at all school-attending children aged 6 to 18, with a minimum duration of 12 weeks. Searches ran to October 2011 and identified 44 included studies with 36,593 participants.
- Two independent reviewers assessed relevance, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias using Cochrane criteria. Results were synthesized narratively because populations, interventions, and outcomes varied widely; no meta-analysis was conducted.
Limitations
- The paper states major limitations: lack of blinding (especially outcome assessors), reliance on self-report for most behavioral outcomes, inconsistent outcome measurement, poor description of randomization, unit-of-analysis errors, few intention-to-treat analyses (16 studies), and high attrition/incomplete data—all likely overestimating treatment effects.
- The paper also states that adverse effects were generally not reported, cost-effectiveness was assessed in only one study, searches were limited to English-language databases, and applicability to low- and middle-income countries is unclear.
- Evident from the text: most studies were conducted in developed countries, populations and interventions were highly heterogeneous, and no meta-analysis was possible, limiting generalizability and precision.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 164 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
From the published reports included in the update, all studies appeared to report the outcomes they intended to as stated in their Methods sections.
“It appears, from the published reports included in this update, that all studies reported on the outcomes that they intended to as reported in the Methods sections of the published papers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All included studies had intervention components delivered in the school setting.
“All studies had intervention components that were delivered in the school setting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The most notable methodological weakness of included studies was lack of blinding of participants, providers, outcome assessors, and data analysts.
“The most notable methodological weakness of these studies was the lack of blinding of participants, providers, outcome assessors, and data analysts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The duration, frequency, and intensity of interventions varied greatly across studies.
“Furthermore, the duration, frequency, and intensity of interventions varied greatly across studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Published protocols for all studies included in the update were not identified through the search strategy.
“However, published protocols for all of the studies included in this update were not identified through our search strategy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingreasoning
Another important limitation was lack of consistency in how outcomes were measured across studies.
“Another important limitation of this literature was the lack of consistency in how outcomes were measured across studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
No two school-based physical activity promotion programs had the same combination of interventions.
“No two school-based physical activity promotion programs had the same combination of interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For behavioral outcomes in most studies, data were collected through student self-report.
“For example, for behavioral outcomes in most studies the data were collected through student selfreport”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Outcomes were measured differently across studies, for example television viewing as minutes per hour versus minutes per week.
“Finally, the outcomes were measured differently across studies: some measured television viewing as minutes per hour while some measured in minutes per week.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most studies in the review did not have blinded outcome assessors.
“More specifically most studies in this review did not have blinded outcome assessors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Children in the intervention group experienced a smaller decrease in MVPA from baseline to follow-up (57% to 53%) compared with the control group (56% to 44%).
“Children in the intervention group experienced a smaller decrease in MVPA from baseline to followup (57% to 53%) compared to the control group (56% to 44%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The results for physical activity rates were mixed.
“The results were mixed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The remaining five grade-school-only duration studies did not report a statistically significant effect on physical activity duration.
“The remaining studies (n = 5) did not report a statistically significant effect on physical activity duration among grade school children.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
There were no differences between the one study reporting a significant positive effect on blood cholesterol and the remaining studies not reporting significant effects with respect to intervention strategies or duration.
“There were no differences between the one study reporting a statistically significant positive effect (Walter 1988) and the remaining studies not reporting a statistically significant effect with respect to intervention strategies or duration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Adverse effects associated with exposure to the school-based physical activity interventions were generally not addressed in published reports.
“Finally, adverse effects associated with exposure to the school-based physical activity interventions were generally not addressed in the published reports of studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cost-effectiveness was assessed in only one study.
“However, cost-effectiveness was assessed in only one study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the three studies reporting positive effects on diastolic blood pressure, the intervention group experienced an average 3 to 4 mmHg reduction compared with control.
“Among the three studies reporting positive effects, on average the intervention group experienced a 3 to 4 mmHg reduction in mean diastolic blood pressure in comparison to the control group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No other studies reported statistically significant changes in mean blood cholesterol at the end of the intervention compared with controls.
“No other studies reported statistically significant changes in mean blood cholesterol at the end of the intervention in comparison to controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All eight studies reporting statistically significant positive effects on BMI included changes to the school curriculum.
“For example, the intervention in all studies included changes to the school curriculum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Studies not reporting a statistically significant effect on physical activity rates generally implemented similar combinations of interventions.
“Generally, those studies not reporting a statistically significant effect on physical activity rates implemented similar combinations of interventions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Generally, duration studies reporting statistically significant effects implemented the intervention over a longer period than those not reporting statistically significant effects.
“Generally, studies reporting statistically significant effects implemented the intervention over a longer period of time in comparison to those not reporting statistically significant effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statistically significant positive effects on VO2max were observed among grade school children only.
“Statistically significant positive effects were observed among grade school children only.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The length of intervention in duration studies ranged from 12 weeks to six years, with a median of one to two school years.
“The length of the intervention ranged from 12 weeks to six years, with the median being one to two school years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There did not appear to be a trend indicating that duration studies with smaller sample sizes reported non-significant results more often than larger studies.
“There did not appear to be a trend indicating that studies with smaller sample sizes reported non-significant (NS) results more o en than larger studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The magnitude of effect on television viewing ranged from 5 minutes less per day to 60 minutes less per day.
“The magnitude of effect ranged from as little as five min less per day to as much as 60 min less per day of television viewing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Changes to the school curriculum were the only consistent component across all three studies reporting statistically significant positive effects on diastolic blood pressure.
“Changes to the school curriculum were the only consistent component across all three studies reporting statistically significant positive effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Changes to the school curriculum were the only consistent component across all four studies reporting a positive effect on systolic blood pressure.
“Changes to the school curriculum were the only consistent component across all four studies reporting a positive effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
There did not appear to be a trend toward a positive effect on blood cholesterol.
“There also did not appear to be a trend toward a positive effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All studies reporting a statistically significant positive effect on BMI demonstrated a smaller increase in BMI from baseline to follow-up for the intervention group compared with control.
“All studies reporting a statistically significant positive effect on BMI, demonstrated a smaller increase in BMI from baseline to followup for those in the intervention group compared to those in the control group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Data collection methods were reported to be valid and reliable in a little over half of included studies.
“Data collection methods were reported to be valid and reliable in a little over half of the included studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
On average, the intervention group experienced an increase of 0.1 to 1.0 kg/m2 less in BMI compared with control.
“On average, the intervention group experienced an increase of 0.1 to 1.0 kg/m 2 less in comparison to those in the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In studies reporting 95% CIs, reduction in television viewing ranged from approximately one minute less per week to two hours less per week.
“In studies reporting 95% CIs, reduction in television viewing ranged from approximately one minute less per week to two hours less per week”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 14 duration studies in total reporting statistically significant positive effects for children and adolescents combined, the intervention was implemented over 18 weeks to several years.
“Of the 14 studies in total reporting statistically significant positive effects for children and adolescents combined, the intervention was implemented over 18 weeks to several years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
For over 90% of studies, all prespecified outcomes of interest were reported.
“For over 90% of studies, all of the study's prespecified outcomes of interest were reported upon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Other interventions in duration studies included education sessions, audiovisual materials, support groups, self contracts, and community-based interventions.
“Other interventions included education sessions, audiovisual materials, support groups, self contracts, and communitybased interventions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
On average, the intervention group experienced a 2 to 5 mmHg reduction in systolic blood pressure compared with control.
“On average, the intervention group experienced a 2 to 5 mmHg reduction in systolic blood pressure in comparison to the control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Duration studies not reporting statistically significant effects generally implemented similar combinations of interventions by classroom teachers but for a shorter period (12 weeks to 10 months).
“Generally, those studies not reporting statistically significant effects on duration of physical activity implemented similar combinations of interventions (i.e.printed educational materials, school curricula), by classroom teachers, but for a shorter period of time (i.e. 12 weeks to 10 months).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Studies reporting a statistically significant positive effect on physical activity rates differed slightly from those not reporting an effect on intervention provider, with the former using PE teachers and research staff and the latter using classroom teachers.
“Studies reporting a statistically significant positive effect differed slightly from those not reporting an effect on intervention provider, with the former using PE teachers and research staff, while the latter used classroom teachers to implement the intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Four of 16 studies reported statistically significant positive effects on mean systolic blood pressure.
“Four of the 16 studies reported statistically significant positive effects on mean systolic blood pressure”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Four of six studies reported statistically significant positive effects on VO2max.
“Four of the six studies reported statistically significant positive effects on VO 2 max”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With the exception of Simon, the magnitude of effect on physical activity rates was relatively small.
“With the exception of Simon, the magnitude of effect is relatively small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Three of 16 studies reported statistically significant positive effects on mean diastolic blood pressure.
“Three of the 16 studies reported statistically significant positive effects on mean diastolic blood pressure”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Generally, the 24 studies not reporting a statistically significant effect on BMI used similar combinations of interventions implemented by similar combinations of providers for similar lengths of time.
“Generally, the 24 studies not reporting a statistically significant effect on BMI used similar combinations of interventions implemented by similar combinations of providers for similar lengths of time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many studies were considered to have low risk of bias only for allocation concealment.
“Components for which many studies were considered to have low risk of bias were only observed for allocation concealment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In this review, changes to BMI were not observed.
“The finding in this review that changes to BMI were not observed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The magnitude of effect for duration of MVPA, television viewing, and VO2max remained the same in the update as in the original review.
“However, the magnitude of effect for duration of MVPA, television viewing, and VO 2 max, remained the same in the update as in the original review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Only one study reported a statistically significant positive effect on pulse rate (Luepker 1996).
“Only one study reported a statistically significant positive effect on pulse rate (Luepker 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Whereas the original review found a positive impact on duration of MVPA, television viewing, blood cholesterol, and VO2max, in this update the positive effect on blood cholesterol was no longer observed.
“Whereas in the original review we found school-based physical activity interventions had a positive impact on duration of MVPA, television viewing, blood cholesterol, and VO 2 max, in this update, the positive effect on blood cholesterol was no longer observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Adverse effects as a result of the school-based physical activity interventions were generally not reported upon by the studies included in this update.
“Furthermore, adverse effects as a result of the schoolbased physical activity interventions were generally not reported upon by the studies included in this update.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
All of the interventions included in this review were multifaceted interventions focused on changing multiple risk behaviors associated with adult-onset CVD.
“All of the interventions included in this review were multifaceted interventions focused on changing multiple risk behaviors associated with adult-onset CVD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Many of the studies reported only modest changes in physical activity, physical fitness, or both.
“Many of these studies have reported modest change in levels of physical activity, physical fitness rates, or both.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
It is unclear from the results of this update how multicomponent strategies interact to impact indicators of physical activity or fitness.
“it is unclear from the results of this update how these multicomponent strategies interact to impact on indicators of physical activity or fitness measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
One other study (Stephens 1998) reported a statistically significant positive effect on pulse rate during maximal exercise and recovery (P < 0.05), rather than resting pulse rate.
“One other study (Stephens 1998) reported a statistically significant positive effect, but on pulse rate during maximal exercise and recovery (P < 0.05), rather than resting pulse rate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In Walther 2009, cardiorespiratory fitness at the end of intervention year 1 was significantly higher in the intervention group than in controls (49 vs 46; P = 0.032; mean difference 3.7, 95% CI 0.3 to 7.2).
“Walther 2009 End of intervention (year 1) 182 boys and girls 49 46 P = 0.032 3.7 (0.3 to 7.2)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walther 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
In Luepker 1996, total cholesterol at the end of intervention year 3 did not differ significantly between groups (4.15 vs 4.14; P = 0.21).
“Luepker 1996 End of intervention (year 3) 4019 boys and girls 4.15 4.14 P = 0.21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Luepker 1996 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
In the updated review, the physical health status outcome of blood cholesterol level (mg/dL) is no longer statistically significant.
“One change to note is that the physical health status outcome blood cholesterol level (mg/dL) is no longer statistically significant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In Kriemler 2010, systolic blood pressure at the end of the intervention did not differ significantly between intervention and control groups (101 vs 102 mmHg; P = 0.88; mean difference 0, 95% CI -0.3 to 0.2).
“Kriemler 2010 End of intervention 502 boys and girls 101 102 P = 0.88 0 (95% CI -0.3 to 0.2)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kriemler 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
In Wang 2008, cardiorespiratory fitness at the end of the intervention differed significantly between groups (155 vs 161; P = 0.025; mean difference -4.4, 95% CI -8.2 to -0.6).
“Wang 2008 End of intervention 316 boys and girls 155 161 P = 0.025 -4.4(-8.2 to -0.6)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
International surveys repeatedly show that less than half of both sexes achieve activity levels needed for health benefits.
“Despite many methodological differences, these surveys have consistently reported that fewer than 50% of boys and girls are active enough to produce health benefits”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Adams 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites CDC 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites CDC 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
When the original review was done, the authors identified no prior systematic review that had assessed how different combinations of school-based programs affect children's physical activity and fitness.
“While evidence exists documenting the benefits of physical activity for healthy children, at the time the original review was conducted, no other reviews had systematically examined the effectiveness of various combinations of school-based interventions in promoting physical activity and fitness in children.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Girls are less likely than boys to meet activity recommendations.
“that a considerably smaller proportion of girls than boys are sufficiently active”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Adams 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites CDC 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites CDC 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Boys tend to be more active than girls.
“Specifically, girls have been found to be less active than boys”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Adams 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites CDC 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kelder 1995b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
More children now display risk factors for cardiovascular disease, such as excess weight, raised blood lipids, and high blood pressure.
“children are increasingly exhibiting risk factors for CVD, such as obesity (Hill 1998;Katz 2009;Moran 1999;Troiano 1995;Warden 1997), elevated blood lipids (Lee 1986), and hypertension (Fernandes 2000;Katz 2009)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Fewer than two-thirds of youth report activity levels that meet current recommendations.
“Yet, according to the latest international Health Behaviour in Schoolaged Children (HBSC) study, less than two-thirds of all young people report participating in sufficient physical activity to meet current guidelines (CDC 2008;WHO 2004b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites CDC 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites WHO 2004b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Among girls, those who are black tend to be less active than those who are white.
“and black girls less active than white girls”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Adams 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites CDC 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kelder 1995b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Competing demands in the curriculum can make it impractical to add more or longer PE sessions.
“Increasing the frequency and duration of PE is not always feasible given competing curriculum demands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Activity behaviors in childhood tend to persist into adult life.
“physical activity patterns track from childhood into adulthood (CDC 2008;Dennison 1988;Kelder 1994;Klepp 1993;Malina 1996;Malina 2001;Raitakari 1994;Sallis 1992;Summerbell 2005)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
As adolescents get older, their participation in physical activity decreases.
“and that activity participation declines with age during adolescence”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Adams 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites CDC 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites CDC 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate even for outcomes with greater standardization of measurement, such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, BMI, and blood cholesterol.
“Due to this level of variation among studies, meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate even for those outcomes such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, BMI, and blood cholesterol where greater standardization of the measurement existed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is not possible to know with certainty whether all outcomes intended to be reported were actually reported in the published reports.
“Therefore, it is not possible to know with certainty if all outcomes that were meant to be reported on actually were in the published reports.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It was likely, though difficult to determine, that students were aware of the outcomes being assessed.
“It was also likely, though difficult to determine, that the students were aware of the outcomes being assessed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The impact of school-based interventions on television viewing is generally modest.
“generally suggesting modest impact on television viewing”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
It is likely that some studies not reporting significant effects on diastolic blood pressure were underpowered.
“It is likely that some of the studies were underpowered to detect a statistically significant effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This, along with other risks of bias identified in the literature, has likely resulted in an overestimation of treatment effects.
“This, along with the other risks of bias identified in this literature, has likely resulted in an overestimation of treatment effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
It is likely that some of the 12 studies not reporting significant effects on systolic blood pressure were underpowered to detect a significant effect.
“It is likely that some of these studies were underpowered to detect a statistically significant effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is likely all five physical activity rate studies had significant power to detect a moderately large treatment effect.
“It is likely all studies had significant power to detect a moderately large treatment effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
These duration findings generally represent a relatively modest magnitude of effect.
“Similar to physical activity rates, these findings generally represent a relatively modest magnitude of effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The absence of observed BMI changes does not suggest that school-based interventions are ineffective.
“does not suggest that school-based interventions are not effective”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The evidence is less convincing for those attending secondary school.
“However, the evidence is less convincing for those attending secondary school.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The findings of this update are consistent with reviews by Flynn 2006, Reilly 2003, Thomas 2004a, and Waters 2011, which reported mixed results for interventions to prevent obesity, promote healthy eating, and promote physical activity in children and adolescents.
“The findings of this update are consistent with the findings of reviews conducted by Flynn 2006, Reilly 2003, Thomas 2004a, and Waters 2011, who reported mixed results regarding the effectiveness of interventions to prevent obesity, promote healthy eating, and promote physical activity in children and adolescents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Study design and conductown data
In the Angelopoulos 2009 trial, attrition bias was at high risk because the number of students who began the study could not be determined.
“Comment: cannot determine how many students started the study only know how many finished”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Waters 2011 found evidence that strategies to prevent obesity lower BMI in children aged 6 to 12.
“However, an update to this review by Waters 2011 indicated there is evidence to suggest that obesity prevention strategies are effective in reducing BMI among children aged 6 to 12 years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Waters 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
For physical health status measures such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure and BMI, in almost all studies it is unclear if the outcome assessors were blinded to study allocation.
“For physical health status measures such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure and BMI, in almost all studies it is unclear if the outcome assessors were blinded to study allocation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Specific limitations include lack of blinding particularly of outcome assessors.
“Specific limitations include: lack of blinding particularly of outcome assessors”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Brown 2009 reported increased physical activity among adolescent girls.
“Furthermore, a review of studies evaluating the impact of physical activity interventions reported increased physical activity among adolescent girls (Brown 2009), and another found a positive effect on fitness measures in children generally (Trudeau 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brown 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The findings of this update and other reviews suggest that schools are an important setting for promoting physical activity.
“The findings of this update as well as other reviews suggest that schools are an important setting in which to promote physical activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Specific limitations include reliance on self-reported outcomes for most behavioral outcomes.
“reliance on self-reported outcomes for most behavioral outcomes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Summerbell 2005 reported that obesity prevention interventions in children had little or no effect.
“Similar results were reported by Summerbell 2005, who found little to no impact of obesity prevention interventions in children.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Summerbell 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Variability in findings may reflect limitations and difficulties of community-based research, where randomization, blind assessment, reliable/valid outcome measures, and prevention of co-intervention are hard to control.
“The variability in these findings may be indicative of the limitations and difficulties inherent in doing community-based research where randomization to treatment groups, blind assessment, reliable and valid outcome measures, and prevention of co-intervention are difficult to control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The results of Waters 2011 illustrate that strategies outside the school setting in addition to school-based strategies are likely needed.
“Furthermore, the results of Waters 2011 illustrate that strategies outside of the school setting in addition to schoolbased strategies are likely needed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Waters 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
Specific limitations include a lack of description of the process used to randomly allocate participants to intervention and control groups.
“a lack of description of the process used to randomly allocate participants to intervention and control groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Measuring physical activity outcomes is difficult from both physiologic and behavioral perspectives.
“It also demonstrates the difficulty in measuring outcomes associated with physical activity, both from a physiologic as well as a behavior perspective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The way outcomes were measured does not explain the difference in positive effects between behavioral outcomes and physical health status outcomes.
“This detracts from the argument that the ways in which the outcomes were measured is responsible for the difference in positive effects observed between the behavioral outcomes versus the physical health status outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Specific limitations include lack of consistency in how outcomes are measured.
“lack of consistency in how outcomes are measured”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The evidence suggests that school-based physical activity interventions of longer duration may be needed to effect change in duration and rate of physical activity and VO2max among grade school children.
“The evidence suggests that school-based physical activity interventions of longer duration may be needed to effect change in duration and rate of physical activity and VO 2 max among grade school children.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Cawley 2007, Gonzalez-Suarez 2009, and Harris 2009 found that increased MVPA in children and adolescents does not necessarily translate into reduced BMI.
“Others have found that while children and adolescents can experience increased levels of MVPA, this does not necessarily translate into reduced BMI (Cawley 2007;Gonzalez-Suarez 2009;Harris 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
This alone may explain why a positive impact was observed for the behavioral outcomes, while a positive effect was observed for only one of the six physical health status outcomes.
“This alone may explain why a positive impact was observed for the behavioral outcomes, while a positive effect was observed for only one of the six physical health status outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
BMI might not be a suitable outcome for judging how well physical activity promotion works in children.
“BMI may not be an appropriate measure to evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity among children”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
There are a number of limitations inherent in the studies included in this review that reduce the overall methodological quality of this evidence.
“As discussed previously there are a number of limitations inherent in the studies included in this review that reduce the overall methodological quality of this evidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
In the Barbeau 2007 trial, incomplete outcome data were not addressed, giving high risk of attrition bias.
“Comment: incomplete outcome data not addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
For Dorgo 2009, the review judged confounders as not controlled (high risk) because not all relevant confounders were taken into account.
“High risk Comment: not all relevant confounders taken into account”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dorgo 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
In Petchers 1988, confounding was at high risk of bias because not all relevant confounders were accounted for.
“Confounders controlled?High risk Comment: all relevant confounders were not accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
In Petchers 1988, incomplete outcome data was at high risk of bias.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk Comment: incomplete outcome data assessment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
In Simon 2004, data collection methods were at low risk of bias because the tools were shown to be valid and reliable.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Low risk Comment: data collection tools were shown to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
In Robinson 1999, confounding was at low risk of bias because all relevant confounders were accounted for.
“Confounders controlled?Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders were accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
In Singhal 2010, data collection methods were at high risk of bias because details of how body mass index was measured were not provided.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?High risk Comment: do not provide details on how body mass index was measured, only state who measured outcome”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
In Salmon 2008, blinding was at high risk of bias because two trained staff members not blinded to group assignment took measurements.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes High risk Comment: Two trained staff members not blinded to group assignment took measurements”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
In Singhal 2010, confounding was at high risk of bias because not all confounders were adequately controlled.
“Confounders controlled?High risk Comment: not all confounders adequately controlled”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
In Robinson 1999, data collection methods were at low risk of bias because the tools were valid and reliable.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Low risk Comment: data collection tools valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
In Singh 2009, incomplete outcome data was at low risk of bias because analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Quote:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singh 2009, p311 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
In Singh 2009, blinding was at high risk of bias because measurements were performed within a 6-week period by a trained research team not blinded to group assignment.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes High risk Quote:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singh 2009, p310 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
In Salmon 2008, incomplete outcome data was at high risk of bias because it was not adequately addressed.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk Comment: incomplete outcome data was not adequately addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
In Reed 2008, confounding was adequately controlled.
“all relevant confounders controlled for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reed 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
In Kipping 2008, confounding was adequately controlled.
“all relevant confounders were controlled for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kipping 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
In Kipping 2008, selective reporting bias was low because all a priori identified outcomes were reported.
“all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kipping 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
In Reed 2008, attrition bias was high because incomplete outcome data were not adequately addressed.
“incomplete outcome data not adequately addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reed 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
In Trevino 2004, confounding was at low risk of bias because all relevant outcomes were accounted for.
“Confounders controlled?Low risk Comment: all relevant outcomes were accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
In Reed 2008, allocation concealment was not achieved because schools could not be blinded to random assignment.
“it was reported that it was not possible for schools to be blinded to random assignment and therefore concealment not attained”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reed 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
In Trevino 2004, allocation concealment was at low risk of bias because the methods ensured no one could foresee intervention assignment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: methods ensured that no one could foresee intervention assignment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
In Reed 2008, the validity and reliability of the physical activity measure were not discussed.
“reliability and validity of the physical activity measure was not discussed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reed 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
In Verstraete 2006, confounding was at high risk of bias because it was not stated and therefore likely not done.
“Confounders controlled?High risk Comment: not stated therefore likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
In Kipping 2008, the physical activity measurement instrument was not demonstrated to be valid or reliable, although other measurements were.
“the physical activity instrument was not shown to be valid or reliable although other measurements were”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kipping 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
In Kipping 2008, outcome assessment for height and weight was blinded: school health assistants taking the measurements were unaware of school allocation.
“school health assistants, who were blinded to the allocation of schools, took height and weight measurements”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kipping 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 159
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 296
- The quote only partly states this claim. 5
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe review found low-quality evidence for physical activity duration, with intervention ranges of 3 to 158 minutes and control ranges of 3 to 143 minutes across 23 studies and 15743 participants.
“Physical activity duration (minutes engaged in physical activity) [follow-up: end of intervention to 4 years] Intervention: 3 to 158 Control: 3 to 143 15743 (23) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe review found low-quality evidence for body mass index, with intervention ranges of 11.3 to 26.0 kg/m2 and control ranges of 12.0 to 26.1 kg/m2 across 27,567 participants.
“Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m 2 ) [follow-up: end of intervention to 4 years] Intervention: 11.3 to 26.0 Control: 12.0 to 26.1 27,567”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe review found low-quality evidence for physical activity rates, with intervention ranges of 53 to 92 and control ranges of 44 to 91 across 5 studies and 4123 participants.
“Physical activity rates (% of participants physically active) [follow-up: end of intervention to 1 year] Intervention: 53 to 92 Control: 44 to 91 4123 (5) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe review found low-quality evidence for television viewing, with intervention group ranges of 85 to 285 minutes and control group ranges of 89 to 288 minutes across 16 studies and 9372 participants.
“Television viewing (minutes spent watching TV) [follow-up: end of intervention to 4 years] Intervention: 85 to 285 Control: 89 to 288 9372 (16) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe review found low-quality evidence for mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure, with intervention ranges of 96 to 138/50 to 73 mm Hg and control ranges of 97 to 139/50 to 76 mm Hg across 16 studies and 13,739 participants.
“Mean systolic / diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) [follow-up: end of intervention to 4 years] Intervention: 96 to 138 / 50 to 73 Control: 97 to 139 / 50 to 76 13,739 (16) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe update's new trials did not substantively change the original review's findings or its recommendations for school-based physical activity and fitness promotion.
“While addition of these new studies contributed further to the evidence-base, they did not substantively alter the findings of the original review or change recommendations made for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents within the school system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe majority of studies evaluated outcomes immediately following the intervention (n = 34), with one study evaluating outcomes two weeks post intervention.
“The majority of studies evaluated outcomes immediately following the intervention (n = 34), with one study evaluating outcomes two weeks post intervention”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe update includes 14 of the original 26 studies.
“Therefore, this update includes 14 of the original 26 studies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe update includes 44 studies (14 from the original review and 30 from the update) and represents complete data for 36,593 study participants.
“This update includes 44 studies (14 from the original review and 30 from the update), and represents complete data for 36,593 study participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenEven BMI, measured most consistently, differed in the amount of clothing worn by participants.
“Even BMI, which was measured most consistently across studies, differed in terms of the amount of clothing worn by participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most common reasons original studies were judged not relevant were that relevant outcome data for children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 were not reported, and the intervention was not normally performed by public health professionals.
“The most common reasons studies were judged as not relevant were data on relevant outcomes for children and adolescents (aged 6 to 18 years) were not reported, and the intervention was not an intervention normally performed by public health professionals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen new inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 12 of the original 26 studies were excluded: nine because they were not RCTs, one because the sample included only overweight or obese children, and two because the intervention was shorter than 12 weeks.
“12 of the original 26 studies were excluded: nine because they were not RCTs”
- Also stated in: § R E S U L T S Description of studies · plain
“one was excluded because the study sample included overweight or obese children only”
- Also stated in: § R E S U L T S Description of studies · plain
“two others were excluded because the intervention was shorter than 12 weeks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § R E S U L T S Description of studies · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFifteen studies focused primarily on grade school programs that included some parental involvement.
“A number of studies (n = 15) focused primarily on grade school programs that included some parental involvement”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe majority of studies distributed printed or audio-visual educational materials primarily to students, sometimes to parents.
“The majority of studies also distributed printed or audio-visual educational materials primarily to students, but sometimes to parents as well”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe original review identified 13,841 records related to physical activity interventions with children and adolescents.
“A total of 13,841 records related to physical activity interventions with children and adolescents were identified in the original review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIn some studies, control schools received other physical activity promotion interventions or standard PE curriculum.
“However, in some studies the control schools received other physical activity promotion interventions provided through other health organizations or venues or standard PE curriculum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCommunity-based interventions were used in conjunction with school-based interventions in about half of the studies.
“Communitybased interventions, such as training sessions and workshops for parents and parent involvement in home-based physical activities (homework), were used in conjunction with school-based interventions in about half of the studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe majority of children were between nine and 11 years of age at baseline.
“The majority of children were between nine to 11 years of age at baseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOf 302 studies assessed for eligibility in the original review, 26 were included.
“Of these, 302 studies were assessed for eligibility, and 26 were deemed of sufficient quality to be included in the original review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most common reasons update studies were judged not relevant were that the design was not an RCT, relevant outcome data for children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 were not reported, or the intervention was not school based.
“The most common reasons studies were judged as not relevant were: the design was not an RCT; data on relevant outcomes for children and adolescents (aged 6 to 18 years) were not reported; or the intervention was not school based.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAll studies included a control group representing either a school or group of schools from a different community, city, or state that did not receive the school-based intervention.
“All studies included a control group that represented either a school or group of schools from a different community, city, or state that did not receive the school-based intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf 285 unique studies assessed for eligibility in the update, 30 met all relevance criteria and were included.
“Of these, 285 unique studies were assessed for eligibility.Of the 285 unique studies, 30 met all relevance criteria and were included in this update”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe majority of included studies were conducted in the US (24), Australia (5), Belgium (3), China (2), and Greece (1).
“The majority of studies were conducted in the US (24), Australia (5), Belgium (3), China (2), and Greece (1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAlmost all studies implemented curricula focused on increasing time spent in physical activity and increasing knowledge about the benefits of an active lifestyle.
“For example, almost all studies implemented curricula focused on increasing time spent in physical activity and on increasing knowledge about the benefits of an active lifestyle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe update search from July 2007 to October 2011 identified 2,378 records related to physical activity interventions with children and adolescents.
“In addition, the search strategy for this update from July 2007 to October 2011 identified 2378 records related to physical activity interventions with children and adolescents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningPhysical health measures were generally more objective than behavioral measures, but there were still significant differences in how data were collected.
“While the data collection procedures for the physical health measures (blood pressure, cholesterol, BMI, pulse, and maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2 max)) were generally more objective than the behavioral measures, there were still significant differences in how the data were collected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll but 11 studies involved children 12 years of age and under at baseline, and three of those included participants who were 16 years at baseline.
“All but 11 studies involved children 12 years of age and under at baseline, three of which included participants who were 16 years at baseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenNone of the projects used the same combination of interventions with the same intensity, making each project unique.
“Further, although all of the projects were primarily school-based, none of the projects used the same combination of interventions with the same intensity, making each project unique.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSeveral theoretical models were used to develop interventions, although in several studies it was unclear if a theoretical model had been used.
“Several theoretical models were used to develop the physical activity interventions, although in several studies it was unclear if a theoretical model had been used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe three most common intervention providers across the 44 included studies were classroom teachers (n = 28), members of the research team (n = 13), and PE teachers (n = 9).
“The three most common intervention providers across the 44 included studies were classroom teachers (n = 28), members of the research team (n = 13), and PE teachers (n = 9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAbout a quarter of studies involved school-based activities other than school curricula.
“About a quarter of the studies involved school-based activities other than school curricula”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIntervention duration varied from a minimum of 12 weeks to six years, with six studies reporting intervention periods of three years or greater.
“The duration of the interventions varied greatly from a minimum of 12 weeks to six years, with six studies reporting intervention periods of three years or greater”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most commonly used theories were social cognitive theory and the health-belief model, while self-determination theory, PRECEDE, social learning theory, and the transtheoretical model were used to a lesser extent.
“The most commonly used theories were social cognitive theory and the health-belief model while self-determination theory, PRECEDE, social learning theory, and the transtheoretical model were used to a lesser extent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataColin-Ramirez 2010 and Dishman 2004 did not show a trend toward a positive effect, and data to assess this were not available for Petchers 1988.
“The results reported by Colin-Ramirez 2010 and Dishman 2004 did not illustrate a trend toward a positive effect, and data to make this assessment were not available for Petchers 1988.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningIn total, the update includes 23 studies reporting the impact of school-based physical activity interventions on physical activity duration.
“In total this update includes 23 studies reporting the impact of school-based physical activity interventions on physical activity duration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost duration studies measured impact immediately post intervention, while one measured at two weeks, one at five months, one at six months, one at nine months, one at 12 months, and one at four years.
“Most studies measured impact on physical activity duration immediately post intervention, while one study measured impact at two weeks post intervention, one at five months, one at six months, one at nine months, one at 12 months, and one at four years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFor cholesterol, about half the studies used nonfasting blood samples and half used fasting blood samples.
“For cholesterol, while the procedures for taking a blood sample and analyzing the sample were similar, about half the studies used nonfasting blood samples and the other half used fasting blood samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInterventions across all physical activity rate studies sought to increase MVPA in children during school hours, and all but one included changes to the curriculum.
“Interventions across all studies sought to increase MVPA in children during school hours, and all but one study (Verstraete 2006) included changes to the curriculum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationHaerens 2006 reported a statistically significant effect overall, but subgroup analysis showed a significant effect for boys only.
“However, while Haerens 2006 reported a statistically significant effect overall, further subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant effect for boys only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationVerstraete 2006 reported a statistically significant difference in MVPA among intervention children compared with control (P < 0.01), although no effect size or 95% CI was provided.
“Verstraete 2006, who measured MVPA using accelerometers, also reported a statistically significant difference in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) among children in the intervention group compared to those in the control group (P < 0.01), although an effect size and 95% CI were not provided.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor all but one study, allocation to treatment or intervention groups occurred at one point in time after study recruitment, and was unknown in one other.
“For all but one study, allocation to treatment or intervention groups occurred at one point in time a er study recruitment, and was unknown in one other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn three of the four studies reporting a positive effect on systolic blood pressure, the intervention was provided by research staff, and it was not stated in the fourth.
“In three of the four studies reporting a positive effect the intervention was provided by members of the research staff (Angelopoulos 2009;Ewart 1998;Reed 2008), and was not stated in the fourth study (Bayne-Smith 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo physical activity rate studies reported statistically significant positive effects (Simon 2004; Verstraete 2006), and three did not (Colin-Ramirez 2010; Dishman 2004; Petchers 1988).
“Two of the studies reported statistically significant positive effects on physical activity rates of children (Simon 2004;Verstraete 2006), and three did not report statistically significant effects (Colin-Ramirez 2010;Dishman 2004;Petchers 1988).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverall, eight of 32 studies reported statistically significant positive effects on BMI in favor of the intervention, while one study reported a statistically significant effect in favor of the control group (Weeks 2008).
“Overall eight of the 32 studies reported statistically significant positive effects on BMI in favor of the intervention (Angelopoulos 2009;Barbeau 2007;Burke 1998;Haerens 2006;Kriemler 2010;Li 2010;Robinson 1999;Salmon 2008), while one study reported a statistically significant effect in favor of the control group (Weeks 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataConfounders were adequately controlled in over 50% of studies, although for some studies important confounders such as socioeconomic status and parental education were not accounted for.
“For the most part, confounders were adequately controlled in over 50% of studies although for some studies important confounders such as socioeconomic status and parental education were not accounted for.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the two physical activity rate studies with significant positive effects, intervention duration ranged from three months to four school years; among those with no effect, duration ranged from one school year to 12 months.
“Of the two studies reporting statistically significant positive effects the intervention ranged from three months (Verstraete 2006) to four school years (Simon 2004), while for those reporting no effect the intervention ranged from one school year to 12 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe sample size of duration studies ranged from 33 to 4019 participants.
“The sample size of the studies ranged from 33 participants to 4019.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo original review studies and six update studies measured duration of physical activity using accelerometers, although the majority relied on self-report.
“Two studies in the original review (Ewart 1998;Stone 2003), and six in the update measured duration of physical activity using accelerometers”
- Also stated in: § Duration of physical activity · plain
“although the majority still relied on self report.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Duration of physical activity · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningStudies were found to be free of selective reporting; however, because many did not have published protocols, it is impossible to know for certain if all outcomes were reported.
“Studies were also found to be free of selective reporting; however, because many of these studies did not have published protocols it is impossible to know for certain if all outcomes were reported on.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSpecific behavior outcomes included physical activity rates (five studies), duration of physical activity (23 studies), and time spent watching television (16 studies).
“Specific outcomes related to behavior included: physical activity rates (five studies), duration of physical activity (23 studies), and time spent watching television (16 studies).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the remaining studies, it was either unclear whether methods were valid and reliable or methods subject to bias were used.
“In the remaining studies it was either unclear whether methods were valid and reliable or methods were used that were subject to bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOf three duration studies evaluating impact on adolescent girls, one reported a statistically significant positive effect (Ewart 1998) and two did not (Bayne-Smith 2004; Neumark-Sztainer 2010).
“One of three studies evaluating impact on adolescent girls reported a statistically significant positive effect (Ewart 1998) and two did not (Bayne-Smith 2004;Neumark-Sztainer 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn very few cases were measures taken to account for clustering effects within schools, and just over a third of studies (n = 16) reported conducting an ITT analysis.
“Furthermore, in very few cases were measures taken to account for clustering effects within schools and only just over a third of studies (n = 16) reported that they conducted an ITT analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe intervention provider in the majority of duration studies was classroom teachers; other providers included PE teachers, research workers, peers, and physical activity instructors.
“The intervention provider in the majority of studies was classroom teachers; however, other intervention providers included PE teachers, research workers, peers, and physical activity instructors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe magnitude of effect across duration studies reporting statistically significant effects varied from just under five minutes to 45 minutes more per week of MVPA, with CIs from 1.4 minutes to approximately 90 minutes more per week.
“The magnitude of effect varied across studies reporting statistically significant effects from just under five min to 45 min more per week of MVPA, and the CIs ranged from as little as 1.4 min to approximately 90 min more per week of MVPA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll but one physical activity rate study evaluated impact immediately following the intervention, while Colin-Ramirez 2010 evaluated impact one year post intervention.
“All but one study evaluated impact on physical activity rates immediately following the intervention, while Colin-Ramirez 2010, evaluated impact one year post intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly one of 10 studies reported a statistically significant positive effect on mean blood cholesterol (Walter 1988), and in that study only schools in the intervention group from a higher socioeconomic status reported a significant positive effect.
“Only one of the 10 studies reported a statistically significant positive effect on mean blood cholesterol (Walter 1988), and in that study only schools in the intervention group from a higher socioeconomic status reported a statistically significant positive effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAmong the two duration studies including both grade school and secondary school children, one did not report statistically significant effects (Lubans 2009), while the second reported a statistically significant effect in favor of the control group (Weeks 2008).
“Among the two studies including both grade school and secondary school children, one did not report statistically significant effects (Lubans 2009), while the second reported a statistically significant effect in favor of the control group (Weeks 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn four of the studies reporting a statistically significant positive effect on BMI, the intervention providers were classroom teachers, while in two studies PE teachers were primarily responsible.
“In four of the studies reporting a statistically significant positive effect the intervention providers were classroom teachers (Barbeau 2007;Burke 1998;Haerens 2006;Robinson 1999), while in two studies PE teachers were primarily responsible for implementing the intervention (Kriemler 2010;Salmon 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationSimon 2004 reported a statistically significant increase in physical activity rates in the intervention group compared with control (P < 0.0001), with intervention children almost three times more likely to be physically active outside school (OR 2.74; 95% CI 2.01 to 3.75).
“Simon 2004 reported a statistically significant increase in physical activity rates in those exposed to the intervention compared to those in the control group (P < 0.0001), and found that intervention group children were almost three times more likely to be physically active outside of school compared to controls (OR 2.74).The 95% CI ranged from 2.01 to 3.75.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe sample sizes of the five physical activity rate studies ranged from 235 to 2111 participants.
“The sample sizes of the five studies ranged from 235 to 2111 participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningIn total, the update includes five studies evaluating the impact of school-based physical activity interventions on physical activity rates.
“In total, this update includes five studies evaluating the impact of school-based physical activity interventions on physical activity rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIntervention providers varied widely, including research staff, teachers, PE teachers, nutritionists, and peers.
“Intervention providers also varied widely from research staff, to teachers, to physical education (PE) teachers, nutritionists, and peers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataSeven of the 16 studies found statistically significant positive effects on television viewing, and one found a statistically significant effect favoring the control group.
“In total seven studies reported statistically significant positive effects on time spent watching television (Burke 1998;Gentile 2009;Jones 2008;Robinson 1999;Simon 2004;Singh 2009;Webber 2008), and one reported a statistically significant effect in favor of the control group (Salmon 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe majority of duration studies reported results for a mixed sample of boys and girls combined, two reported results for boys and girls separately, and three included girls only.
“The majority of studies reported results for a mixed sample of boys and girls combined, two reported results for boys and girls separately, and three included girls only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe remaining 12 studies did not report statistically significant effects on diastolic blood pressure, and no studies showed a trend toward a positive effect.
“The remaining 12 studies did not report statistically significant effects on mean diastolic blood pressure, and no studies showed a trend toward a positive effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll physical activity rate studies reported results for a mixed sample of boys and girls combined, except Dishman 2004, which included girls only.
“All studies reported results for a mixed sample of boys and girls combined, except for Dishman 2004, who included girls only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor VO2 max, half of the six studies measured blood gases following exertion, while the other half used pulse rate recovery as a proxy.
“Finally, for the six studies measuring VO 2 max half measured blood gases following exertion, while the other half used pulse rate recovery as a proxy for maximal oxygen uptake.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn some duration studies, intervention participants engaged in MVPA longer than control participants at follow-up; in others, intervention participants had a smaller decrease in duration compared with controls.
“In some studies participants in the intervention group engaged in MVPA longer than control group participants at follow-up, while in other studies, those in the intervention group had a smaller decrease in duration of physical activity in comparison to control group participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAnother limitation was unit of allocation errors; in some studies allocation was by institution or classroom but assessment occurred at the individual level.
“Another limitation of this literature was unit of allocation errors.In some of the studies allocation was o en by institution (e.g.school) or classroom, but assessment occurred at the level of the individual.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne of the two physical activity rate studies with significant positive effects used accelerometers to measure physical activity, while all other studies used self-report.
“One of the two studies reporting a statistically significant positive effect used accelerometers to measure physical activity rates (Verstraete 2006), while all other studies used self-report.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe intervention in all duration studies reporting statistically significant effects included changes to school curricula, and in many studies printed educational materials.
“The intervention in all studies reporting statistically significant effects included changes to school curricula, and in many studies printed educational materials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the five physical activity rate studies, four focused on grade school children only, and one reported on grade school and secondary school students.
“Of these, four studies focused on grade school children only”
- Also stated in: § Physical activity rates · plain
“and one reported on grade school and secondary school students”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Physical activity rates · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll eight studies reporting statistically significant positive effects on BMI used printed education materials, three included community-based strategies, and three included education sessions.
“All studies used printed education materials, while three studies included community-based strategies (Burke 1998;Haerens 2006;Kriemler 2010), and three included education sessions (Burke 1998;Kriemler 2010;Salmon 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 23 duration studies, 17 reported results for grade school children only, two included grade school and secondary school students, and three reported results for adolescents only.
“Of these, 17 studies reported results for grade school children only”
- Also stated in: § Duration of physical activity · plain
“two included grade school and secondary school students”
- Also stated in: § Duration of physical activity · plain
“and three reported results for adolescents only”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Duration of physical activity · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMany studies attempted to evaluate intervention integrity, and some conducted process evaluations in addition to evaluating effectiveness.
“Finally, many studies attempted to evaluate the extent to which the intervention was implemented as intended (intervention integrity), and some conducted process evaluations in addition to evaluating intervention effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSchool curriculum was a component in all studies reporting statistically significant effects on television viewing, with printed education materials, education sessions, and community-based strategies implemented in almost all such studies.
“School curriculum was a component in all studies reporting statistically significant effects, with printed education materials, education sessions, and community-based strategies being implemented in almost all studies reporting statistically significant effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong grade-school-only duration studies, 12 reported statistically significant positive effects, two of which used accelerometers.
“Among the studies evaluating duration of physical activity among grade school children only, 12 studies reported statistically significant positive effects”
- Also stated in: § Duration of physical activity · plain
“two of which measured duration of physical activity with accelerometers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Duration of physical activity · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataBlood pressure measures were least consistent, varying between manual mercury sphygmomanometer and electronic Dinamap, timing 5 to 15 minutes after active periods, and averaging of three or five measures.
“Blood pressure measures were least consistent where in some studies blood pressure was taken manually using a mercury sphygmomanometer, and in others electronically using a Dinamap machine.”
- Also stated in: § Figure 3. (Continued) · plain
“the timing of when blood pressure was measured differed significantly across studies with timing varying between 5 and 15 min following active periods during school hours.”
- Also stated in: § Figure 3. (Continued) · plain
“in some studies the average of three measures taken one minute apart were used, in others five measures were averaged, and in others the second and third of three measures were averaged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Figure 3. (Continued) · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSpecific physical health outcomes included mean systolic blood pressure (16 studies), mean diastolic blood pressure (16 studies), blood cholesterol level (10 studies), BMI (32 studies), VO2 max (six studies), and pulse rate (six studies).
“Specific outcomes of physical health status included: mean systolic blood pressure (16 studies), mean diastolic blood pressure (16 studies), blood cholesterol level (10 studies), BMI (32 studies), VO 2 max (six studies), and pulse rate (six studies).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStudies not reporting a significant effect on systolic blood pressure used similar combinations of interventions but tended to use classroom and PE teachers more often and were implemented for longer periods compared with studies reporting significant positive effects.
“Generally, the studies not reporting a statistically significant effect on mean systolic blood pressure used similar combinations of interventions, but tended to use classroom Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PE teachers more o en, and tended to be implemented for longer periods of time, in comparison to studies reporting statistically significant positive effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningIn this update, 16 studies evaluated the impact of school-based physical activity interventions on television viewing.
“In total this update includes 16 studies evaluating the impact of school-based physical activity interventions on television viewing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is also some limited evidence in this update that positive effects are maintained in the longer term (six months to four years), although only a small number of studies measured outcomes beyond the end of the intervention.
“There is also some limited evidence in this update that these positive effects are maintained in the longer term, (i.e. six months to four years), although only a small number of studies measured outcomes beyond the end of the intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn this review there is some limited evidence to suggest that school-based physical activity interventions may have a positive effect on physical activity rates in children, meaning there was some limited evidence that school-based interventions were effective in increasing the proportion of children who engaged in MVPA during school hours.
“Also, in this review there is some limited evidence to suggest that school-based physical activity interventions may have a positive effect on physical activity rates in children, meaning there was some limited evidence to suggest that school-based interventions were effective in increasing the proportion of children who engaged in MVPA during school hours.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor duration of physical activity, 14 of 23 studies showed a positive effect, and 5 of those used an accelerometer to measure duration.
“For this outcome, 14 of 23 studies demonstrated a positive effect, and of those five studies measured duration of physical activity with an accelerometer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAt this time there is some limited evidence to suggest that school-based physical activity interventions have a small to moderate impact on behavioral outcomes related to physical activity as well as on one physical health status measure.
“At this time there is some limited evidence to suggest that schoolbased physical activity interventions have a small to moderate impact on behavioral outcomes related to physical activity as well as on one physical health status measure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStudies reporting a positive effect on VO2max made changes to the school curriculum, two also included printed education materials, and one included education sessions.
“Studies reporting a positive effect made changes to the school curriculum, two also included printed education materials, and one included education sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningGenerally, the results of this update are for the most part unchanged from those reported in the original review, with two exceptions.
“Generally the results of this update are for the most part unchanged from those reported in the original review with two exceptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThere is only limited evidence that boys and girls respond differently to school-based interventions as well as different components of interventions from the studies included in this review.
“There is only limited evidence that boys and girls respond differently to school-based interventions as well as different components of interventions from the studies included in this review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe results illustrate a positive improvement in VO2max across studies ranging from 1.6 to 3.7 mL/kg per min, while a fourth study reported a lower heart rate by 4 beats/min after strenuous exercise following the intervention.
“The results illustrate a positive improvement in VO 2 max across studies ranging from 1.6 to 3.7 mL/ kg per min, while a fourth study reported a lower heart rate by 4 beats/min a er strenuous exercise following the intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn Bush 1989, total serum cholesterol differed significantly between groups during intervention years 1 and 2 but not in years 3 and 4.
“During intervention (year 1) 187 189 P < 0.02 During intervention (year 2) 189 189 P = 0.418 During intervention (year 3) 171 167 P = 0.432 Bush 1989 End of intervention (year 4) 431 boys and girls 177 180 P = 0.348”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bush 1989 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIn Martinez 2008, systolic blood pressure at the end of the 9-month intervention did not differ significantly between groups (102 vs 103 mmHg; P = 0.96; mean difference 0.1, 95% CI -1.7 to 1.8).
“Martinez 2008 Girls End of intervention (9 months) 1044 boys and girls 102 103 P = 0.96 0.1 (95% CI -1.7 to 1.8)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Martinez 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIn Luepker 1996, systolic blood pressure at the end of intervention year 3 did not differ significantly between groups (114 vs 114 mmHg; P = 0.71).
“Luepker 1996 End of intervention (year 3) 4019 boys and girls 114 114 P = 0.71”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Luepker 1996 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThis scope limitation led to the exclusion of 12 of the 26 studies that had been included in the original review.
“This resulted in 12 of the 26 studies included in the original review being excluded in this update.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe 2011 update did not alter the conclusions and recommendations of the original review.
“This update has not impacted the conclusions and recommendations from the original review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningApplying the new relevance criteria led to the exclusion of 12 studies from the original review in the update: 9 were not RCTs, 2 had interventions shorter than 12 weeks, and 1 included only overweight or obese children.
“This resulted in 12 studies from the original review being excluded from the update: 9 because they were not RCTs”
- Also stated in: § Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · plain
“2 because the intervention was shorter than twelve weeks (Eliakim 1996; Fardy 1996); and 1 because the study sample included overweight or obese children only (Carrel 2005a)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIt is hard to increase children's activity because many influences-personal, institutional, community, policy, and environmental-shape their behavior.
“Increasing physical activity among children and adolescents is difficult as behavior is influenced by several factors including: personal factors; institutional, community, and public policy; and the physical environment (CIHR 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CIHR 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEven though PE is usually part of the curriculum, it may be scheduled rarely and students are often not very active during it.
“Although most schools require PE as part of their curriculum, PE classes may occur infrequently and children are o en relatively inactive in them (McKenzie 1995;Pate 2006;Simons-Morton 1990;Simons-Morton 1994).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPrograms in schools can address children regardless of future chronic disease risk and can raise both knowledge and behavior that support healthier living.
“School-based interventions can target simultaneously, children both at risk and not at risk for future chronic diseases, and can increase both knowledge and behavior conducive to healthier lifestyles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSchool-based activity promotion may lower population chronic disease because children spend many waking hours at or going to school and in many countries attend until adolescence.
“Given school-aged children spend a significant amount of their wakeful hours either in transit to or in the school setting, and that in many countries, all children attend school until they reach adolescence, school-based physical activity promotion interventions have potential to reduce population-wide chronic diseases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough schools by themselves cannot eliminate inactivity, they can serve as the main community resource for helping students meet recommended activity levels.
“While the schools alone cannot solve the problem of inactivity, they do have the potential to become the central element in a community that ensures students participate in the recommended amount of time engaged in physical activity (Koplan 2005;Pate 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Koplan 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pate 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSchool programs reach children across risk levels, including those lacking play space, and can reduce stigma for those at risk.
“Schools provide benefit to children from all risk groups (Harrell 1996;WHO 2004a), particularly those with limited or no access to play areas (McKenzie 1996); and avoids stigmatization of at-risk children (Harrell 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Harrell 1996 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites WHO 2004a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McKenzie 1996
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSchool-based activity has been linked indirectly with academic outcomes such as reduced dropout, improved conduct, self-esteem, engagement, and attention.
“Physical activity in schools has also been shown to be indirectly associated with academic achievement including lower drop-out rates, better classroom behavior, self-esteem and engagement in school, and on-task behavior (Mahar 2006;Trudeau 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationYounger children are generally more active than older children and adolescents.
“older children and adolescents less active than younger children”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Adams 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites CDC 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kelder 1995b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSchools are a particularly suitable setting for population-wide activity programs, since no other institution reaches children as strongly during their first 20 years.
“The school setting is an ideal environment for population-based physical activity interventions as no other institution has as much influence on children during their first two decades of life (Story 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Story 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral troubling trends in schools coincide with rising obesity: less active commuting, shorter recess, and fewer students enrolled in PE.
“Worrisome trends in the school setting are occurring concurrently with the increasing prevalence of obesity including a decline in physically active transport to and from school, recess duration, and enrolment in PE classes (Pate 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pate 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSigns of coronary disease, namely fatty streaks in the coronary arteries, have been detected in overweight teenagers and in autopsies of children.
“atherosclerotic fatty streaks in the coronary arteries, indicative of coronary heart disease, have been found in overweight adolescents (Haque 2008), and postmortem in children (Berenson 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Haque 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Berenson 1992 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenDisagreements in risk of bias assessment were resolved through discussion until consensus was reached.
“Disagreements were resolved through discussion until consensus was reached.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningEligible programs had to be public-health relevant rather than physician- or clinic-run, feasible for local public health staff, school-based, and intended to raise activity and fitness.
“The intervention had to be relevant to public health practice (meaning the focus was on health promotion from an individual or population-wide perspective, was not physician or clinic based)”
- Also stated in: § Types of studies · plain
“the intervention was implemented in a school setting and was aimed at increasing physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Types of studies · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataA narrative summary was used because the studies differed greatly in participants, programs, and outcome measures.
“The results were summarized narratively due to wide variations in the populations, interventions evaluated, and outcomes measured.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningStudies focused only on subgroups such as obese or inactive children were excluded from the update, which removed a few studies from the original review.
“Studies not aimed at the general population (e.g.studies including obese children only, or only low-active children) were excluded from this update.Again this resulted in a small number of studies included in the original review being excluded in the update.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIt remained uncertain from those reviews how much the school context mattered for effectiveness and how much activity by itself improved outcomes like blood pressure, lipids, weight, and fitness.
“In both reviews it is unclear what specific contribution the school setting had on intervention effectiveness as well as the individual contribution of physical activity on improved health status measures, such as blood pressure, blood lipids, weight, and fitness measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Summerbell 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thomas 2004a
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAlthough the authors recognize that post hoc questions may be biased, they considered the revised eligibility criteria necessary to secure the strongest evidence for their research question.
“The review authors are aware that post hoc questions are susceptible to bias (Higgins 2011); however, in light of the growing body of literature on the effectiveness of school-based physical activity promotion interventions, we believe the changes in inclusion and exclusion criteria were necessary to ensure the most rigorous evidence answering our research question was included in this update.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Higgins 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe update set a minimum intervention length of 12 weeks, removing some shorter studies that had been in the original review.
“Studies had to have at a minimum an intervention duration of at least 12 weeks otherwise they were excluded from the update.Again this resulted is some studies included in the original review being excluded from the update.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenData were extracted only for outcomes for which some degree of reliability and validity was demonstrated.
“The reliability and validity of all data collection measures were also assessed and data extracted only for those outcomes for which some degree of reliability and validity was demonstrated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAny disagreements were resolved by discussion to consensus.
“Where discrepancies existed, discussion occurred until consensus was reached.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenFor this update, eligible studies were restricted to randomized trials whose intervention ran for 12 weeks or longer.
“Furthermore, in this update we included data only from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a minimum intervention duration of 12 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhen students learn about activity and get opportunities to be active at school, they are expected to form healthier habits that could persist into adult life.
“and by providing students with both knowledge and the opportunity to be more active during the school day, children will develop healthier behaviors that may track in adulthood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause interventions, populations, and outcomes varied, statistical combination across studies was inappropriate, so results were synthesized narratively.
“Variation in the interventions, populations, and outcomes measured made it inappropriate to combine the results statistically across studies, therefore the results are synthesized narratively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor the update, all studies from the original review and all newly identified studies were assessed independently for risk of bias by two of three review authors.
“For the update all studies from the original review as well as studies identified for this update were assessed independently for risk of bias by two of three review authors (MD, RL, KD).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataRisk of bias judgments were made separately for seven domains.
“Critical assessments were made separately for each of seven domains with judgments of low risk of bias, high risk of bias, and unclear risk of bias”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAdditional studies were sought by examining bibliographies of included papers and reviews and by asking experts and original authors.
“We identified additional studies by searching the reference lists of included studies and (systematic) reviews, meta-analyses, and health technology assessment reports.”
- Also stated in: § Contacting experts · plain
“Experts in the field of physical activity promotion in children and adolescents were contacted with a view to seeking additional references.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Contacting experts · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenFor the update, three review authors independently extracted population and intervention characteristics for all new studies using standard data extraction templates.
“For this update three review authors (MD, RL, KD) independently abstracted relevant population and intervention characteristics for all new studies using standard data extraction templates”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataRelevance screening and data extraction were done by two reviewers working independently with standardized instruments.
“Standardized tools were used by two independent reviewers to assess each study for relevance and for data extraction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSearches covered multiple databases from 1985 through July 2007 for the original review and from July 2007 through October 2011 for the update.
“For the original review the following databases were searched from 1985 to July 2007: MEDLINE, BIOSIS, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL).For the updated review, the same databases were searched again to capture studies published between July 2007 to October 2011.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataRisk of bias was evaluated for every study using the Cochrane Handbook's guidance.
“In addition, each study was assessed for risk of bias as specified in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth prior reviews covered complex programs that addressed diet and activity at the same time and were delivered in several settings, including schools, communities, and public places.
“In both the Summerbell 2005 and Thomas 2004a reviews, interventions were multifaceted, meaning the interventions targeted multiple behaviors including diet and physical activity simultaneously, and that they were implemented congruently in multiple settings such as the community, schools, and public places.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Summerbell 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thomas 2004a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOne prior review, Summerbell 2005, looked at obesity prevention programs for children; another, Thomas 2004a, evaluated approaches to healthy weight promotion in young people.
“For example, Summerbell 2005 explored the impact of interventions to prevent obesity in children, and Thomas 2004a assessed the impact of strategies to promote healthy body weight in children and adolescents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Summerbell 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thomas 2004a
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenEligible participants were school students aged 6-18, including healthy, overweight, and obese children; studies treating a specific serious illness or comorbidity with activity were excluded.
“Studies that included school-attending children and adolescents between the ages of 6 to 18 years were included in this review.This included all otherwise healthy children and adolescents whether they were overweight, obese, or not.We excluded studies where participants received a physical activity intervention as part of a treatment regimen for a specific critical illness or comorbidity (e.g.di”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningFor the update, eligibility was narrowed to randomized trials, so some non-randomized studies from the original review were dropped.
“the inclusion/exclusion criteria were modified to include only those studies that were RCTs.This change in inclusion criterion resulted in a number of non-RCTs included in the original review being excluded from the update.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningStudies were not eligible if all intervention activities took place outside school.
“We excluded studies when the intervention was conducted entirely outside of the school setting (e.g.community setting, public place, recreation facility, physician office, camp setting).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt is possible that some duration studies with smaller sample sizes were underpowered to detect statistically significant changes in physical activity duration.
“However, it is possible that some studies with smaller sample sizes were underpowered to detect statistically significant changes in physical activity duration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataAll 16 studies measuring television viewing used self-report.
“All studies measured television viewing through self-report.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIt is questionable whether the observed reductions in television viewing would result in reduced risk for chronic diseases.
“drawing into question whether these reductions would result in reduced risk for the development of chronic diseases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlmost all recent reviews show that school-based physical activity interventions increase children's and adolescents' time in MVPA, and in some cases this translates into improved fitness measures.
“Almost all recent reviews illustrate that school-based physical activity interventions do result in children and adolescents spending more time engaged in MVPA and in some instances this translates into improved fitness measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLack of change in leisure-time physical activity or fitness has been attributed most often to inadequate dose, poor compliance, inattention to multiple risk factors and overly simplistic interventions, methodological errors in fitness measurement, and failure to control confounders.
“Lack of change in leisure time physical activity or physical fitness, in turn, has been attributed most o en to issues of: a) inadequate dose (Tolfrey 2000); b) poor compliance (Baranowski 1990); c) inattention to the multiplicity of risk factors for physical inactivity and subsequent overly simplistic, unidimensional interventions;”
- Also stated in: § Potential biases in the review process · plain
“d) methodologic errors in measuring fitness (e.g.assessing heart rate only a er, as opposed to during, activity); and e) a failure to control for potentially confounding variables (Tolfrey 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- Also stated in: § Potential biases in the review process · plain
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe results must be interpreted cautiously and likely overestimate the true treatment effect.
“As such the results must be interpreted cautiously and likely overestimate the true treatment effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Angelopoulos 2009 trial, allocation was concealed because all participants were allocated at a single point after recruitment, so group assignment was unknown at recruitment.
“Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis represents an important risk of bias for this literature and likely resulted in either overestimating the treatment effect or finding a statistically significant positive effect where one did not exist.
“This represents an important risk of bias for this literature and likely resulted in either overestimating the treatment effect or finding a statistically significant positive effect where one did not exist.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHillsdon 2005 reported similar results among adults for physical activity promotion interventions.
“An additional review by Hillsdon 2005 also reported similar results among adults for interventions to promote physical activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hillsdon 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataA more comprehensive approach (e.g., home, community, policy) may be needed.
“a more comprehensive approach (e.g.home, community, policy) is needed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCommunity-based strategies have been shown to be somewhat effective in promoting healthy behavior among populations.
“Community-based strategies have been shown to be somewhat effective in promoting healthy behavior among populations (Dobbins 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dobbins 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningSearches could not be conducted in non-English databases, so articles published in Chinese not indexed in English databases were not eligible.
“Most notably, it was not possible to conduct searches in databases that are not English.”
- Also stated in: § Potential biases in the review process · plain
“For example articles published in Chinese that were not indexed in English language databases were not eligible for inclusion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Potential biases in the review process · plain
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Angelopoulos 2009 trial, all outcomes specified a priori were reported, giving low risk of reporting bias.
“Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductnone givenIt is likely that some studies not reporting significant effects on pulse rate were underpowered.
“It is likely that some of the studies were underpowered to detect a statistically significant effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEmpirical evidence and theoretical frameworks suggest that CVD risk reduction strategies should target multiple high-risk behaviors simultaneously.
“Although empirical evidence (Thomas 1999) and theoretical frameworks suggest that CVD risk reduction strategies should target multiple high-risk behaviors simultaneously”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thomas 1999
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenWhile it is possible that some studies were missed by the search strategy, the review anticipates that this number would be small, and that the results have not been significantly impacted.
“While it is possible that some studies were missed by our search strategy, we anticipate that this number would be small, and that the results of our review have not been significantly impacted upon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe review team may have overestimated treatment effects or interpreted results more positively than warranted.
“Given a meta-analysis was not conducted, it is possible that the review team may have overestimated treatment effects when interpreting the results across studies.”
- Also stated in: § Potential biases in the review process · hedged
“While efforts were Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews undertaken to minimize this bias (multiple review authors were involved in interpreting the results and provided comments on dra s of this update) it is still possible that we have interpreted the results to be more positive than they actually are.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Potential biases in the review process · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe studies included in this review are generally applicable to public health practice in developed countries.
“The studies included in this review are generally applicable to public health practice in developed countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSignificant improvements in the quality of the evidence were observed from the original review to this update.
“However, on a positive note, significant improvements in the quality of the evidence were observed from the original review to this update.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe evidence suggests that effective school-based interventions include some combination of school curricula, printed educational materials, and likely, though there is less evidence to support it, educational sessions, physical activity specific sessions, and community-based initiatives.
“The evidence also suggests that effective school-based interventions include some combination of school curricula, printed educational materials, and likely, though there is less evidence to support it, educational sessions, physical activity specific sessions, and community-based initiatives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis likely contributed to an overestimation of the treatment effect, given those engaging in the intervention may have been more likely to complete the study and data collection, and therefore biasing the results toward a positive effect.
“This as well likely contributed to an overestimation of the treatment effect, given those engaging in the intervention may have been more likely to complete the study and data collection, and therefore biasing the results toward a positive effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn only nine of 25 studies were more objective outcome measurements obtained from pedometers or accelerometers on time spent engaged in physical activity, and only one of 14 studies did not rely on self-report to measure time spent watching television.
“In only nine of 25 studies were more objective outcome measurements obtained from pedometers or accelerometers on time spent engaged in physical activity, and only one of 14 studies did not rely on selfreport to measure time spent watching television.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataWhile the majority of outcomes were assessed using measures with at least some degree of demonstrated reliability and validity, most behavioral outcomes were measured through self-report (except for a small, albeit growing, number of studies using accelerometers), while physical health status outcomes were measured through more objective means.
“While the majority of outcomes were assessed using measures with at least some degree of demonstrated reliability and validity, most of the behavioral outcomes were measured through selfreport (except for a small, albeit growing, number of studies using accelerometers), while the physical health status outcomes were measured through more objective means.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe effect reported by Waters 2011 was generally small, with significant heterogeneity across studies.
“However, it is important to point out that there was significant heterogeneity of results across studies and that overall, the magnitude of effect reported by Waters 2011 generally was small.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Waters 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Angelopoulos 2009 trial, the allocation sequence was generated with random digits, giving low risk of selection bias.
“Comment: random digits used to develop allocation sequence”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIt is possible that one of the two studies not reporting a statistically significant effect on VO2max was underpowered to detect a significant difference.
“It is possible that one of the two studies not reporting a statistically significant effect was underpowered to detect a significant differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningBias may have been introduced during the review process despite strategies to reduce bias.
“It is possible that bias was introduced during the review process despite the implementation of strategies to reduce bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAt best the evidence is of moderate risk of bias, and therefore must be used cautiously.
“However, at best the evidence is of moderate risk of bias, and therefore must be used cautiously.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenA comprehensive search of RCTs was conducted.
“A comprehensive search of RCTs was conducted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenIn the Angelopoulos 2009 trial, every relevant confounder was controlled for.
“Comment: all relevant confounders were controlled for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKatz 2009 found a positive effect on weight in a meta-analysis of school-based obesity prevention interventions and argued for ongoing school-based intervention.
“Another meta-analysis of school-based obesity prevention interventions found a positive effect on weight, and clearly argued the need for ongoing school-based intervention (Katz 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Katz 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenA number of studies experienced high attrition rates as well as incomplete outcome data.
“Furthermore, a number of studies experienced high attrition rates as well as incomplete outcome data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTrudeau 2008 reported that fitness measures improved in children in general.
“Furthermore, a review of studies evaluating the impact of physical activity interventions reported increased physical activity among adolescent girls (Brown 2009), and another found a positive effect on fitness measures in children generally (Trudeau 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Trudeau 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenIt is not clear if these findings are applicable to low- and middle-income countries, particularly where the public health sector system or school systems (or both) are different, or when cultural differences are taken into account.
“However, it is not clear if these findings are applicable to low-and middle-income countries particularly among those where the public health sector system or school systems (or both) are different, or when cultural differences are taken into account.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Angelopoulos 2009 trial, blinding was probably not carried out, leaving performance and detection bias at unclear risk.
“Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Dishman 2004, the review judged random sequence generation as unclear risk because the randomization process was not reported.
“Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dishman 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Bush 1989, the review judged data collection methods as unclear risk because there was insufficient data to determine reliability and validity.
“Unclear risk Comment: insufficient data to determine reliability and validity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bush 1989 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationIn the Bush 1989 trial, attrition bias was at high risk because only 431 participants (41.4%) underwent rescreening two years after the cohort was formed, and students who moved between control and intervention schools were dropped from analysis.
“Only 431 (41.4% of participants were rescreened 2 years after forming the cohort.Students who had moved from a control to an intervention school or vice versa were dropped from the analysis”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Barbeau 2007 trial, all outcomes specified a priori were reported, giving low risk of reporting bias.
“Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Donnelly 2009, the review judged confounders as controlled (low risk) because all relevant confounders were taken into account.
“Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders taken into account”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Donnelly 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Colin-Ramirez 2010, the review judged data collection methods as unclear risk because the authors stated that reliability and validity of the questionnaire had been reported previously and validated for a Spanish population, but no details were provided other than a citation.
“Unclear risk Comment: authors state reliability and validity of questionnaire has been reported previously and validated for a Spanish population, but no details provided other than a citation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colin-Ramirez 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Donnelly 2009, the review judged random sequence generation as unclear risk because no description of the randomization process was given.
“Unclear risk Comment: no description of the randomization process given”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Donnelly 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenIn the Burke 1998 trial, every relevant confounder was accounted for.
“Comment: all relevant confounders were accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIn the Bush 1989 trial, selective reporting bias was at low risk.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Donnelly 2009, the review judged allocation concealment as low risk because the criterion was not applicable: all participants were allocated at one point in time following recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Donnelly 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Bayne-Smith 2004 trial, the reliability and validity of most outcomes were not stated, giving high risk for data collection methods.
“Comment: reliability and validity of most outcomes not stated”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Bush 1989 trial, blinding was probably not carried out, leaving performance and detection bias at unclear risk.
“Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Bush 1989 trial, allocation was concealed because all participants were allocated at a single point after recruitment, so group assignment was unknown at recruitment.
“Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Donnelly 2009, the review judged data collection methods as low risk because data collection tools were reported to be valid and reliable.
“Low risk Comment: data collection tools reported to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Donnelly 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Bayne-Smith 2004 trial, although most confounders did not differ significantly, a few small differences remained unaccounted for, giving high risk of confounding.
“Comment: while there were no significant differences in most confounders, there were a few small differences which were not accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Bayne-Smith 2004 trial, allocation was concealed because all participants were allocated at a single point after recruitment, so group assignment was unknown at recruitment.
“Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Burke 1998 trial, all outcomes specified a priori were reported, giving low risk of reporting bias.
“Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Colin-Ramirez 2010, the review judged random sequence generation as unclear risk because no description of the randomization process was given.
“Unclear risk Comment: no description of the randomization process given”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colin-Ramirez 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Araujo-Soares 2009 trial, the randomization process was not reported, leaving risk of selection bias unclear.
“Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Burke 1998 trial, outcome data were complete, giving low risk of attrition bias.
“Comment: outcome data complete”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Burke 1998 trial, blinding was probably not carried out, leaving performance and detection bias at unclear risk.
“Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Bayne-Smith 2004 trial, all outcomes specified a priori were reported, giving low risk of reporting bias.
“Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Burke 1998 trial, the reliability and validity of most outcomes were not stated, giving high risk for data collection methods.
“Comment: reliability and validity of most outcomes not stated”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Bayne-Smith 2004 trial, the randomization process was not reported, leaving risk of selection bias unclear.
“Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Araujo-Soares 2009 trial, all outcomes specified a priori were reported, giving low risk of reporting bias.
“Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningFor Dorgo 2009, the review judged blinding as unclear risk because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dorgo 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationFor Dorgo 2009, the review judged incomplete outcome data as high risk because 24 subjects failed to attend the post-test data collection and were not included in the data analyses.
“High risk Quote:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dorgo 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Dishman 2004, the review judged confounders as controlled (low risk) because relevant confounders were controlled, including age, ethnicity, and body mass index.
“Low risk Comment: relevant confounders were controlled including age, ethnicity, body mass index”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dishman 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor Donnelly 2009, the review judged blinding as low risk because blinding was done where possible: research assistants were blinded to condition for measurement of primary and secondary outcomes and for data entry.
“Low risk Comment: blinding was done where possible -research assistants were blinded to condition for measurement of the primary and secondary outcomes and for data entry”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Donnelly 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Dishman 2004, the review judged incomplete outcome data as low risk because missing data for physical activity at follow-up were imputed.
“Low risk Comment: missing data for physical activity at follow-up were imputed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dishman 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Burke 1998 trial, the randomization process was not reported, leaving risk of selection bias unclear.
“Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationFor Bush 1989, the review judged confounders as controlled (low risk) because a multiple regression analysis adjusted the observed score difference between control and intervention groups for confounders.
“Low risk Quote: Multiple regression analysis was used to adjust the observed difference in scores between the control and intervention groups for these confounders”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bush 1989 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Araujo-Soares 2009 trial, allocation was concealed because all participants were allocated at a single point after recruitment, so group assignment was unknown at recruitment.
“Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIn the Angelopoulos 2009 trial, the data collection methods were valid and reliable.
“Comment: data collection methods valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Dishman 2004, the review judged selective reporting as low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported on.
“Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dishman 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Barbeau 2007 trial, important variables such as socioeconomic status were not assessed or controlled for, giving high risk of confounding.
“Comment: important variables like socioeconomic status not assessed or controlled for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Bush 1989 trial, no description of the randomization process was given, leaving risk of selection bias unclear.
“Comment: no description of the randomization process given”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Barbeau 2007 trial, allocation was concealed because it took place after testing and the next participant's group was not determined at study entry.
“Comment: allocation occurred after testing, therefore concealed.It was not known or determined at time of entry to study which group the next participant would go”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Dorgo 2009, the review judged allocation concealment as low risk because the criterion was not applicable: all participants were allocated at one point in time following recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dorgo 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Araujo-Soares 2009 trial, attrition bias was at low risk, though it was unclear whether intention-to-treat analysis was used at the 9-month follow-up.
“Comment: unsure if intention to treat conducted at 9-month follow-up”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Dishman 2004, the review judged allocation concealment as low risk because the criterion was not applicable: all participants were allocated at one point in time following recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dishman 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Barbeau 2007 trial, the reliability and validity of most outcomes were not stated, giving high risk for data collection methods.
“Comment: reliability and validity of most outcomes not stated”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Bush 1989, the review judged selective reporting as low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported on.
“Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bush 1989 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Colin-Ramirez 2010, the review judged allocation concealment as low risk because the criterion was not applicable: all schools were allocated at one point in time following recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all schools were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colin-Ramirez 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Bayne-Smith 2004 trial, incomplete outcome data were not addressed, leaving risk of attrition bias unclear.
“Comment: incomplete outcome data not addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Colin-Ramirez 2010, the review judged incomplete outcome data as low risk because there was an 80% participation rate, with no details or reasons given for attrition.
“Low risk Comment: 80% participation rate, no details/reasons given for attrition”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colin-Ramirez 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Colin-Ramirez 2010, the review judged blinding as high risk because data were collected through self report from participants.
“High risk Comment: data collected through self report from participants”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colin-Ramirez 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Barbeau 2007 trial, the randomization process was not reported, leaving risk of selection bias unclear.
“Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor Dishman 2004, the review judged blinding as unclear risk because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dishman 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Burke 1998 trial, allocation was concealed because all participants were allocated at a single point after recruitment, so group assignment was unknown at recruitment.
“Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn the Araujo-Soares 2009 trial, the data collection tools were reported to be valid and reliable.
“Comment: data collection tools reported to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Barbeau 2007 trial, blinding was probably not carried out, leaving performance and detection bias at unclear risk.
“Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Dishman 2004, the review judged data collection methods as low risk because data collection tools were reported to be valid and reliable.
“Low risk Comment: data collection tools reported to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dishman 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Donnelly 2009, the review judged selective reporting as low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported on.
“Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Donnelly 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the Araujo-Soares 2009 trial, not all relevant confounders were accounted for, giving high risk of confounding.
“Comment: not all relevant confounders accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Colin-Ramirez 2010, the review judged confounders as not controlled (high risk) because confounders were not addressed.
“High risk Comment: confounders not addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colin-Ramirez 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Araujo-Soares 2009 trial, blinding was probably not carried out, leaving performance and detection bias at unclear risk.
“Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Colin-Ramirez 2010, the review judged selective reporting as unclear risk because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colin-Ramirez 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Dorgo 2009, the review judged random sequence generation as unclear risk because the randomization process was not reported.
“Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dorgo 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the Bayne-Smith 2004 trial, blinding was probably not carried out, leaving performance and detection bias at unclear risk.
“Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Donnelly 2009, the review judged incomplete outcome data as low risk because there was 2.5% missing data, not likely to affect results.
“Low risk Comment: there was 2.5% missing data, not likely to affect results”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Donnelly 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Haerens 2006, the review judged data collection methods as low risk because data collection tools were reported to be valid and reliable.
“Low risk Comment: data collection tools reported to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Gentile 2009, the review judged allocation concealment as low risk because the criterion was not applicable: all participants were allocated at one point in time following recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gentile 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Kriemler 2010, the review judged selective reporting as low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported on.
“Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kriemler 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Haerens 2006, the review judged selective reporting as low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported on.
“Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationFor Ewart 1998, the review judged blinding as low risk because technicians taking measurements were reported not aware of girls' experimental status.
“Low risk Comment: technicians taking measurements were reported not aware of girls' experimental status”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ewart 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Ewart 1998, the review judged allocation concealment as low risk because the criterion was not applicable: all participants were allocated at one point in time following recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ewart 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Gentile 2009, the review judged confounders as controlled (low risk) because all relevant confounders were taken into account.
“Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders taken into account”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gentile 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Haerens 2006, the review judged confounders as controlled (low risk) because all relevant confounders were taken into account.
“Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders taken into account”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Dorgo 2009, the review judged data collection methods as low risk because data collection tools were reported to be valid and reliable.
“Low risk Comment: data collection tools reported to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dorgo 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Jones 2008, the review judged incomplete outcome data as high risk because incomplete outcome data were not adequately addressed.
“High risk Comment: incomplete outcome data was not adequately addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationFor Kipping 2008, the review judged random sequence generation as unclear risk, quoting that random allocation to intervention or control school was concealed and done by one of the authors.
“Unclear risk Quote:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kipping 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Ewart 1998, the review judged incomplete outcome data as low risk because outcome data were complete.
“Low risk Comment: outcome data complete”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ewart 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Jones 2008, the review judged confounders as controlled (low risk) because all relevant confounders were taken into account.
“Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders taken into account”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationFor Ewart 1998, the review judged confounders as unclear risk because the authors stated no differences in behavioral and familial factors were observed, but did not indicate which factors these were.
“Unclear risk Comment: authors state no differences in behavioral and familial factors were observed, but do not indicate which factors these were”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ewart 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Haerens 2009, the review judged data collection methods as low risk because data collection tools were reported to be valid and reliable.
“Low risk Comment: data collection tools reported to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Dorgo 2009, the review judged selective reporting as low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported on.
“Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dorgo 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Jones 2008, the review judged data collection methods as low risk because data collection tools were reported to be valid and reliable.
“Low risk Comment: data collection tools reported to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Haerens 2006, the review judged random sequence generation as unclear risk because the randomization process was not reported.
“Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Haerens 2009, the review judged selective reporting as low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported on.
“Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Gentile 2009, the review judged random sequence generation as unclear risk because the randomization process was not reported.
“Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gentile 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Haerens 2009, the review judged incomplete outcome data as high risk because incomplete outcome data were not adequately addressed.
“High risk Comment: incomplete outcome data was not adequately addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Gentile 2009, the review judged incomplete outcome data as high risk because incomplete outcome data were not adequately addressed.
“High risk Comment: incomplete outcome data was not adequately addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gentile 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationFor Kriemler 2010, the review judged random sequence generation as low risk because randomization used a random numbers table.
“Low risk Comment: randomized using a random numbers table”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kriemler 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Gentile 2009, the review judged selective reporting as low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported on.
“Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gentile 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningFor Gentile 2009, the review judged data collection methods as low risk because data collection tools were reported to be valid and reliable, although methods could have been stronger for body mass index.
“Low risk Comment: data collection tools reported to be valid and reliable although methods could have been stronger for body mass index”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gentile 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor Gentile 2009, the review judged blinding as unclear risk because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gentile 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Jones 2008, the review judged allocation concealment as low risk because the criterion was not applicable: all participants were allocated at one point in time following recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor Haerens 2009, the review judged blinding as unclear risk because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Jones 2008, the review judged blinding as high risk because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“High risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Ewart 1998, the review judged data collection methods as unclear risk because reliability and validity of data collection tools were not mentioned.
“Unclear risk Comment: reliability and validity of data collection tools was not mentioned”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ewart 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Ewart 1998, the review judged random sequence generation as unclear risk because the randomization process was not reported.
“Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ewart 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenFor Kriemler 2010, the review judged blinding as high risk because only part of the researchers were blinded to group allocation due to the immense personnel used for assessments, and blinding was not fully implemented.
“High risk Quote:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kriemler 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor Jones 2008, the review judged random sequence generation as unclear risk, noting that a computer-generated random numbers table was used for the randomization process.
“Unclear risk Comment: a computer-generated random numbers table was used for the randomization process”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Jones 2008, the review judged selective reporting as low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported on.
“Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Kriemler 2010, the review judged confounders as controlled (low risk) because relevant confounders were taken into account.
“Low risk Comment: relevant confounders taken into account”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kriemler 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Ewart 1998, the review judged selective reporting as low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported on.
“Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ewart 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor Haerens 2006, the review judged blinding as unclear risk because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Kriemler 2010, the review judged incomplete outcome data as low risk because the intention-to-treat principle was employed.
“Low risk Comment: intention-to-treat principle employed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kriemler 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Kriemler 2010, the review judged allocation concealment as low risk because the criterion was not applicable: all participants were allocated at one point in time following recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kriemler 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Haerens 2009, the review judged allocation concealment as low risk because the criterion was not applicable: all participants were allocated at one point in time following recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Haerens 2009, the review judged random sequence generation as unclear risk because no description of the randomization process was given.
“Unclear risk Comment: no description of the randomization process given”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Haerens 2006, the review judged allocation concealment as low risk because the criterion was not applicable: all participants were allocated at one point in time following recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor Haerens 2006, the review judged incomplete outcome data as high risk because incomplete outcome data were not adequately addressed.
“High risk Comment: incomplete outcome data was not adequately addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Haerens 2009, the review judged confounders as controlled (low risk) because all relevant confounders were taken into account.
“Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders taken into account”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haerens 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Petchers 1988, blinding was at unclear risk of bias because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Stephens 1998, allocation concealment was at low risk of bias because all participants were allocated at one time point after recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn McManus 2008, allocation concealment was judged low risk because opaque envelopes were used to maintain allocation concealment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: opaque envelopes were utilized to maintain allocation concealment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Stone 2003, allocation concealment was at low risk of bias because all participants were allocated at one time point after recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Neumark-Sztainer 2010, blinding was judged high risk because outcomes were self-reported and it was unclear whether trained staff taking measurements were blinded to intervention allocation.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes High risk Comment: self-reported; unclear if trained staff taking measurements were blinded to intervention allocation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Luepker 1996, incomplete outcome data was judged low risk because outcome data were complete.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Comment: outcome data complete”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Singhal 2010, selective reporting was at unclear risk of bias because it was not clear whether all a priori outcomes were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: not clear if all a priori outcomes were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Simon 2004, incomplete outcome data was at low risk of bias because outcome data were complete.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Comment: outcome data complete”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Li 2010, selective reporting was judged unclear risk because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: no Information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Peralta 2009, control of confounders was judged low risk because all relevant confounders were controlled for.
“Confounders controlled?Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders were controlled for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Stephens 1998, selective reporting was at low risk of bias because all a priori outcomes were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Singhal 2010, allocation concealment was at low risk of bias because all participants were allocated at one time point after recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Luepker 1996, blinding was judged unclear risk because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Petchers 1988, allocation concealment was at low risk of bias because all participants were allocated at one time point after recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn Li 2010, allocation concealment was judged low risk because all participants were allocated at one point after recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn McManus 2008, control of confounders was judged low risk because all relevant confounders were controlled for.
“Confounders controlled?Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders were controlled for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Petchers 1988, selective reporting was at low risk of bias because all a priori outcomes were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Li 2010, the risk of bias for random sequence generation was unclear because the randomization process was not described.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no description of the randomization process given”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Simon 2004, random sequence generation was at unclear risk of bias because the randomization process was not reported.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Lubans 2009, validity and reliability of data collection methods was judged low risk because tools were shown to be valid and reliable for pedometers and for measuring television viewing.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Low risk Comment: tools were shown to be valid and reliable for both pedometers and the method to measure television viewing”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Singhal 2010, incomplete outcome data was at low risk of bias because participant loss was minimal and reasons were given in Figure 1.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Comment: participant loss minimal, reasons given in Figure 1”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Lubans 2009, incomplete outcome data was judged high risk because it was not adequately addressed.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk Comment: incomplete outcome data not adequately addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductown dataIn Stephens 1998, random sequence generation was at unclear risk of bias because the randomization process was not reported.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Neumark-Sztainer 2010, control of confounders was judged high risk because only baseline age, weight, and race were considered.
“Confounders controlled?High risk Comment: only considered baseline age, weight, and race”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Robinson 1999, selective reporting was at low risk of bias because all a priori outcomes were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Salmon 2008, data collection methods were at low risk of bias because the tools were valid and reliable.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Low risk Comment: data collection tools valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Salmon 2008, selective reporting was at low risk of bias because all a priori outcomes were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Robinson 1999, allocation concealment was at low risk of bias because all participants were allocated at one time point after recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Simon 2004, allocation concealment was at low risk of bias because all participants were allocated at one time point after recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationIn Robinson 1999, blinding was at low risk of bias because participants and school personnel were informed of the intervention but unaware of the primary hypothesis, and measurements were made by trained staff blinded to the experimental design.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Quote:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Robinson 1999, p1562
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Peralta 2009, random sequence generation was judged low risk because participants were randomized using a computer-based number-producing algorithm to either the intervention or active comparison group.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Comment: participants were randomized, using a computer-based number producing algorithm, to either the intervention or active comparison group”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Luepker 1996, allocation concealment was judged low risk because all participants were allocated at one point after recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Peralta 2009, validity and reliability of data collection methods was judged high risk because although reliability and validity were discussed for some data collection methods, not all were discussed.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?High risk Comment: although reliability and validity were discussed with some of the data collection methods, not all were discussed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn McManus 2008, blinding was judged high risk because only partial blinding was implemented.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes High risk Comment: partial blinding was implemented only”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Peralta 2009, allocation concealment was judged low risk because all participants were allocated at one point after recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Neumark-Sztainer 2010, selective reporting was judged unclear risk because it was not discussed in the report.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: not discussed in report”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Neumark-Sztainer 2010, allocation concealment was judged low risk because all participants were allocated at one point after recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Petchers 1988, random sequence generation was at unclear risk of bias because the randomization process was not described.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no description of the randomization process was given”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Salmon 2008, allocation concealment was at unclear risk of bias because it was not stated whether allocation was adequately concealed.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: it was not stated if allocation was adequately concealed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn McManus 2008, incomplete outcome data was judged high risk because it was not adequately addressed.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk Comment: incomplete outcome data was not adequately addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Lubans 2009, random sequence generation was judged unclear risk because although an envelope was used for concealment, it did not show how the randomization sequence was generated.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: although an envelope was used to attain concealment, having an envelope with the assignment does not tell us how authors generated the randomization sequence”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Stephens 1998, confounding was at low risk of bias because all relevant confounders were accounted for.
“Confounders controlled?Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders were accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductown dataIn Peralta 2009, selective reporting was judged low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Simon 2004, selective reporting was at low risk of bias because all a priori outcomes were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Lubans 2009, blinding was judged low risk because blinding was implemented.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Comment: blinding implemented”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Neumark-Sztainer 2010, validity and reliability of data collection methods was judged unclear risk because details on reliability and validity of measures were not provided.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Unclear risk Comment: did not provide details on reliability and validity of measures”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductown dataIn Neumark-Sztainer 2010, random sequence generation was judged unclear risk because the randomization process was not described.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no description of the randomization process given”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Lubans 2009, selective reporting was judged low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Luepker 1996, control of confounders was judged low risk because all relevant confounders were accounted for.
“Confounders controlled?Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders were accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningFor Kriemler 2010, the review judged data collection methods as low risk because data collection tools were reported to be valid and reliable.
“Low risk Comment: data collection tools reported to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kriemler 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Martinez 2008, validity and reliability of data collection methods was judged low risk because data collection methods were shown to be valid and reliable.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Low risk Comment: data collection methods were shown to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Peralta 2009, incomplete outcome data was judged low risk because outcome data were complete.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Comment: outcome data complete”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn Stone 2003, blinding was at unclear risk of bias because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn Singh 2009, data collection methods were at low risk of bias, though more detail on reliability and validity could be given.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Low risk Comment: more detail on reliability and validity could be given”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn Stephens 1998, blinding was at unclear risk of bias because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Singhal 2010, blinding was at unclear risk of bias because it was not reported whether assessors were blinded.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: not reported if assessors were blinded”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Martinez 2008, random sequence generation was judged low risk because randomization used computer-generated random numbers.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Comment: randomization took place using computer generated random numbers”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Salmon 2008, random sequence generation was at high risk of bias because participants selected a ticket from a container specifying group allocation.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Comment: participants selected a ticket from a container which specified group allocation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Stephens 1998, data collection methods were at unclear risk of bias because there was insufficient data to determine reliability and validity.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Unclear risk Comment: insufficient data to determine reliability and validity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Martinez 2008, control of confounders was judged high risk because not all relevant confounders were accounted for.
“Confounders controlled?High risk Comment: not all relevant confounders accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Petchers 1988, data collection methods were at low risk of bias because the tools were shown to be valid and reliable.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Low risk Comment: data collection tools shown to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn McManus 2008, random sequence generation was judged low risk because although the exact sequence generation was not described, the report described how schools were selected from lists and how allocation was concealed.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Comment: does not tell us exactly how they generated the sequence but rather how they selected schools from lists and kept allocation concealed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn Simon 2004, blinding was at unclear risk of bias because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Luepker 1996, random sequence generation was judged unclear risk because the randomization process was not reported.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Simon 2004, confounding was at low risk of bias because all relevant confounders were accounted for.
“Confounders controlled?Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders were accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Salmon 2008, confounding was at low risk of bias because all relevant confounders were accounted for.
“Confounders controlled?Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders were accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductown dataIn Martinez 2008, selective reporting was judged low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningIn McManus 2008, validity and reliability of data collection methods was judged low risk because data collection methods were shown to be valid and reliable.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Low risk Comment: data collection methods were shown to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Singh 2009, random sequence generation was at unclear risk of bias because the randomization process was not reported.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Lubans 2009, control of confounders was judged high risk because not all relevant confounders were controlled for.
“Confounders controlled?High risk Comment: all relevant confounders were not controlled for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Stone 2003, random sequence generation was at unclear risk of bias because the randomization process was not reported.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Robinson 1999, incomplete outcome data was at low risk of bias because outcome data were complete.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Comment: outcome data complete”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenIn Stephens 1998, incomplete outcome data was at high risk of bias.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk Comment: incomplete outcome data assessment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Li 2010, control of confounders was judged high risk because no confounders were taken into account.
“Confounders controlled?High risk Comment: did not take any confounders into account”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn McManus 2008, selective reporting was judged high risk because data were collected on other outcomes that were not reported, such as secondary outcomes blood pressure and body mass index.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: data collected on other outcomes that were not reported (e.g.secondary outcomes blood pressure and body mass index)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductown dataIn Luepker 1996, selective reporting was judged low risk because all outcomes identified a priori were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Singh 2009, confounding was at low risk of bias because all relevant confounders were accounted for.
“Confounders controlled?Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders were accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Li 2010, blinding of outcome assessors was judged low risk because outcome assessors were blinded.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Comment: outcome assessors blinded”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Singhal 2010, random sequence generation was at unclear risk of bias because no description of the randomization process was given.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no description of the randomization process given”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Robinson 1999, random sequence generation was at unclear risk of bias because the randomization process was not reported.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Martinez 2008, allocation concealment was judged low risk because all participants were allocated at one point after recruitment, so allocation was not known at recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn Neumark-Sztainer 2010, incomplete outcome data was judged low risk because the intervention group had less than 10% drop-out, though no details were provided on reasons for drop-outs.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Comment: less than 10% drop-out rate in intervention group; no details provided on reasons for drop-outs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Luepker 1996, validity and reliability of data collection methods was judged low risk because data collection tools were valid and reliable.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Low risk Comment: data collection tools were valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Singh 2009, allocation concealment was at low risk of bias because all participants were allocated at one time point after recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Singh 2009, selective reporting was at low risk of bias because all a priori outcomes were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Li 2010, incomplete outcome data was judged low risk because about 10% of both groups did not provide follow-up data due to moving away or being absent on measurement day.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Comment: approximately 10% of intervention and control groups did not provide follow-up data (either moved away or absent on day outcomes were measured)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationIn Kipping 2008, attrition bias was high because, although analyses were described as intention-to-treat, only children with complete baseline and outcome data were included.
“all analyses were undertaken using an intention to treat protocol, regardless of the number of lessons taught in intervention schools.However, we only included in the analyses those children with complete data at baseline and outcome”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kipping 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Verstraete 2006, data collection methods were at unclear risk of bias because reliability and validity were not specifically stated.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Unclear risk Comment: reliability and validity of data collection methods not specifically stated”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationIn Reed 2008, the method of random sequence generation was unclear: the person who remotely randomized schools was not involved in the trial, but how randomization was performed was not described.
“schools were then remotely randomized to either Usual Practice or Intervention by an epidemiologist not involved in the trial”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reed 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenOn 29 April 2010, the review authors decided to limit the scope to randomized controlled trials and studies with an intervention lasting at least 12 weeks.
“On 29 April 2010, review authors decided to limit their scope by including only RCTs and studies where the intervention was implemented for a minimum of 12 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Similar criteria have been adopted in recent Cochrane reviews.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Walter 1988, selective reporting was at low risk of bias because all a priori outcomes were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Verstraete 2006, selective reporting was at low risk of bias because all a priori outcomes were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Walter 1988, random sequence generation was at unclear risk of bias because the randomization process was not reported.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationIn Reed 2008, blinding was of unclear risk because no information was provided and it was likely not done.
“no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reed 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn Walter 1988, blinding was at unclear risk of bias because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Walter 1988, confounding was at low risk of bias because all relevant confounders were controlled for.
“Confounders controlled?Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders controlled for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn Verstraete 2006, blinding was at unclear risk of bias because no information was given and it was likely not done.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no information given, likely not done”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Verstraete 2006, random sequence generation was at unclear risk of bias because the randomization process was not reported.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: randomization process not reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Walter 1988, data collection methods were at unclear risk of bias because reliability and validity were not specifically stated.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Unclear risk Comment: reliability and validity of data collection methods not specifically stated”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Walter 1988, incomplete outcome data was at low risk of bias because analyses examined whether attrition would introduce bias and average values were imputed.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Comment: analyses were done to see if bias would be introduced due to attrition and average values of the risk values were imputed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Verstraete 2006, incomplete outcome data was at high risk of bias because it was not adequately addressed.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk Comment: incomplete outcome data was not adequately addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Reed 2008, selective reporting bias was low because all a priori identified outcomes were reported.
“all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reed 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe review has significant differences from its protocol, including the addition of risk of bias and overview of study population tables.
“Significant differences between the protocol and review exist including the addition of risk of bias and overview of study population tables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Trevino 2004, data collection methods were at unclear risk of bias because reliability and validity were not specifically stated.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Unclear risk Comment: reliability and validity of data collection methods not specifically stated”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductcitationIn Trevino 2004, blinding was at low risk of bias because school principals were asked not to inform students, parents or school staff of the intervention assignment.
“Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Quote:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Trevino 2004, p912 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Stone 2003, incomplete outcome data was at low risk of bias because outcome data were complete.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Comment: outcome data complete”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIn this update, all studies meeting the relevance criteria were included regardless of their level of bias.
“In this update, all studies identified for the update meeting the relevance criteria, were included regardless of the level of bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe original review excluded studies of very poor methodological quality.
“In the original review, studies of very poor methodological quality were excluded from the review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Trevino 2004, incomplete outcome data was at low risk of bias because outcome data were complete.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Comment: outcome data complete”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Stone 2003, data collection methods were at low risk of bias because the tools were shown to be valid and reliable.
“Data collection methods valid and reliable?Low risk Comment: data collection tools shown to be valid and reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationIn Kipping 2008, allocation concealment was adequate: random assignment of schools to intervention or control was concealed and performed by an author with no prior knowledge of the schools' characteristics.
“random allocation to intervention or control school was concealed and done by one of the authors (DAL).The investigator who did the random allocation had no prior knowledge of characteristics of any of the schools”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kipping 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe inclusion criteria were changed after consultation with the Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group because many studies had been published since 2008.
“Changes were made to the inclusion criteria a er consulting with the Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group because of the large number of studies published since 2008.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Stone 2003, confounding was at low risk of bias because all relevant confounders were accounted for.
“Confounders controlled?Low risk Comment: all relevant confounders were accounted for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Verstraete 2006, allocation concealment was at low risk of bias because all participants were allocated at one time point after recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe update searches covered July 2007 to October 2011 and identified 30 new studies that were included in the updated review.
“Searches run for update period (July 2007 -October 2011); 30 new project accounts identified and included in updated review”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Stone 2003, selective reporting was at low risk of bias because all a priori outcomes were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Trevino 2004, random sequence generation was at low risk of bias because randomization used a random number table.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Comment: randomization took place using a random number table”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningIn Walter 1988, allocation concealment was at low risk of bias because all participants were allocated at one time point after recruitment.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: criterion not applicable because all participants were allocated at 1 point in time following recruitment, so at time of recruitment allocation was not known”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThree new relevance criteria were added and applied to all included studies: randomized controlled trial design, intervention duration of at least 12 weeks, and intervention aimed at the general population.
“Three new relevance criteria added and applied to all included studies: 1) Randomized controlled trial; 2) Intervention implemented for a minimum of 12 weeks; 3) Intervention aimed at general population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningOn 11 March 2010, the review authors decided to exclude studies that did not deliver the intervention to the general population of elementary students.
“On 11 March 2010, review authors decided to exclude studies that did not provide the intervention to the general population of elementary students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In several developed countries, more than half of school-attending children are overweight.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn Trevino 2004, selective reporting was at low risk of bias because all a priori outcomes were reported.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: all outcomes identified a priori were reported on”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
It is uncertain which strategies best promote lifelong healthy behavior.
“However, it is not clear what the most effective strategies are to promote life-long healthy behaviors.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Similar criteria have been adopted in recent Cochrane reviews.
“Similar criteria have been implemented in recent Cochrane reviews.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In several developed countries, more than half of school-attending children are overweight.
“This decision was made because in a number of developed countries more than half of school attending children are overweight.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In physical activity trials, lack of blinding of assessors is a common and meaningful source of bias.
“In physical activity trials, this is a common and meaningful source of bias, 74 which should be addressed in future research.”
From Physical Activity for Cognitive and Mental Health in Youth: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms (2016) · cites this paper as [74]
Several reviews provide evidence for the integration of more physical activity into the school curriculum.
“Furthermore, several reviews provide evidence for the integration of (more) PA into the curriculum (15, 66, 69, 74, 77, 78).”
From How can physical activity be promoted among children and adolescents? A systematic review of reviews across settings (2019) · cites this paper as [78]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Television-viewing effect count changes from seven to six
MinorThe same discussion first identifies seven studies with statistically significant positive effects, then refers to six such studies.
“In total seven studies reported statistically significant positive effects on time spent watching television (Burke 1998;Gentile 2009;Jones 2008;Robinson 1999;Simon 2004;Singh 2009;Webber 2008)”
“Of the six studies reporting statistically significant positive results, all demonstrated a significant decrease in the amount of time children spent watching television, compared to the control group.”
VO2-max measurement methods are counted differently
MinorOne passage divides the six studies equally between blood-gas measurement and pulse-rate proxies; the later breakdown names two blood-gas studies and four proxy studies.
“Finally, for the six studies measuring VO 2 max half measured blood gases following exertion, while the other half used pulse rate recovery as a proxy for maximal oxygen uptake.”
“Two studies measured VO 2 max through blood gases a er exertion (Barbeau 2007;McManus 2008), and four measured heart rate recovery following exertion as a proxy for VO 2 max (Bayne-Smith 2004;Trevino 2004;Walther 2009;Wang 2008).”
Television-viewing measurement is described as both entirely and not entirely self-reported
MinorThe results section says all studies measured television viewing by self-report, but the quality discussion says one study did not rely on self-report.
“All studies measured television viewing through self-report.”
“only one of 14 studies did not rely on selfreport to measure time spent watching television”
Luepker pulse-rate effect is placed at conflicting follow-up times
MinorThe narrative says the significant effect appeared three years after the intervention, whereas Appendix 13 reports P = 0.03 at the end of the three-year intervention.
“Interestingly, Luepker 1996 did not observe a statistically significant effect immediately following the three-year intervention, but rather at three years post intervention (P < 0.03).”
“Luepker 1996 End of intervention (year 3) 4019 boys and girls 80 79 P = 0.03”
Li 2010 total does not match group counts
MinorThe reported intervention and control counts sum to 4,120, not the stated total of 4,210.
Reported 4210 · recomputed 4120
“I: 2092 C: 2028 T:4210”
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139 · see citing works
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763 · see citing works
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164 · see citing works
Kytle, J., & Bandura, A. (1978) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065952 · Cited by 25,422 · see citing works
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048 · see citing works
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975 · see citing works
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687 · Cited by 10,548 · see citing works
‘Small Changes' to Diet and Physical Activity Behaviors for Weight Management
Hills, A. P., Byrne, N. M., Lindstrom, R. C., & Hill, J. O. (2013) · Obesity Facts · doi:10.1159/000345030 · Cited by 9,526 · see citing works
Kilzer, E., & Skinner, B. F. (1953) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707860 · Cited by 8,934 · see citing works
Child abuse: Adolescent records vs. adult recall
Femina, D. D., Yeager, C. A., & Lewis, D. O. (1990) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/0145-2134(90)90033-p · Cited by 8,820 · see citing works
Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in the United States, 1999-2004
Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Curtin, L. R., McDowell, M. A., Tabak, C. J., & Flegal, K. M. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.13.1549 · Cited by 8,720 · see citing works
Lee, I.-M., Shiroma, E. J., Lobelo, F., Puska, P., Blair, S. N., & Katzmarzyk, P. T. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61031-9 · Cited by 8,215 · see citing works
The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change.
Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38 · Cited by 7,782 · see citing works
Genetics of Food Intake Self-Regulation in Childhood: Literature Review and Research Opportunities
Faith, M. S., Carnell, S., & Kral, T. V. E. (2013) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000353879 · Cited by 7,628 · see citing works
Symonds, P. M. (1954) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0051901 · Cited by 4,902 · see citing works
Janssen, I., & LeBlanc, A. G. (2010) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-40 · Cited by 4,829 · see citing works
A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents
SALLIS, J. F., PROCHASKA, J. J., & TAYLOR, W. C. (2000) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200005000-00014 · Cited by 4,421 · see citing works
Predicting Obesity in Young Adulthood from Childhood and Parental Obesity
Whitaker, R. C., Wright, J. A., PEPE, M. S., Seidel, K. D., & Dietz, W. H. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199709253371301 · Cited by 4,391 · see citing works
Evidence Based Physical Activity for School-age Youth
Strong, W. B., Malina, R. M., Blimkie, C. J. R., Daniels, S. R., Dishman, R. K., Gutin, B., Hergenroeder, A. C., Must, A., Nixon, P. A., Pivarnik, J. M., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.055 · Cited by 4,222 · see citing works
(2008) · Cited by 3,790 · see citing works
Interventions for preventing obesity in children
Brown, T. J., Moore, T. H., Hooper, L., Gao, Y., Zayegh, A. M., Ijaz, S., Elwenspoek, M. M. C., Foxen, S. C., Magee, L., O’Malley, C. L., et al. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001871.pub4 · Cited by 2,996 · see citing works
Danaei, G., Ding, E. L., Mozaffarian, D., Taylor, B., Rehm, J., Murray, C. J. L., & Ezzati, M. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000058 · Cited by 2,860 · see citing works
A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2008.00552.x · Cited by 2,569 · see citing works
Spear, B. A., Winick, M., Phillips, C., & Wilfley, D. E. (1975) · Cited by 2,495 · see citing works
Why People Use Health Services
Rosenstock, I. M. (2005) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00425.x · Cited by 2,329 · see citing works
Why People Use Health Services
Rosenstock, I. M. (1966) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3348967 · Cited by 2,305 · see citing works
Thomas, B. H., Ciliska, D., Dobbins, M., & Micucci, S. (2004) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2004.04006.x · Cited by 2,118 · see citing works
Self-citationReducing Children's Television Viewing to Prevent Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Robinson, T. N. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.16.1561 · Cited by 1,838 · see citing works
Physical activity from childhood to adulthood
Telama, R., Yang, X., Viikari, J., Välimäki, I., Wanne, O., & Raitakari, O. (2005) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.12.003 · Cited by 1,585 · see citing works
Andersen, L. B., Harro, M., Sardinha, L. B., Froberg, K., Ekelund, U., Brage, S., & Anderssen, S. A. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69075-2 · Cited by 1,465 · see citing works
Interventions for preventing obesity in children
Waters, E., de Silva-Sanigorski, A., Burford, B. J., Brown, T., Campbell, K. J., Gao, Y., Armstrong, R., Prosser, L., & Summerbell, C. D. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001871.pub3 · Cited by 1,455 · see citing works
Overweight Prevalence and Trends for Children and Adolescents
Troiano, R. P. (1995) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170230039005 · Cited by 1,437 · see citing works
Epidoxorubicin In, A., Cascinu, S., Labianca, R., Barone, C., Santoro, O., Carnaghi, C., Frontini, L., Aitini, E., Rota, S., Torri, V., et al. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0_6514 · Cited by 1,394 · see citing works
Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical activity, and food choice behaviors
Kelder, S. H., Perry, C. L., Klepp, K. I., & Lytle, L. L. (1994) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.84.7.1121 · Cited by 1,388 · see citing works
Reducing Obesity via a School-Based Interdisciplinary Intervention Among Youth
Gortmaker, S. L., Peterson, K. E., Wiecha, J. L., Sobol, A. M., Dixit, S., Fox, M. K., & Laird, N. M. (1999) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.153.4.409 · Cited by 1,335 · see citing works
Andersen, R. E., Crespo, C. J., Bartlett, S. J., Cheskin, L. J., & Pratt, M. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.12.938 · Cited by 1,333 · see citing works
Kirkham, J. J., Dwan, K. M., Altman, D. G., Gamble, C., Dodd, S., Smyth, R., & Williamson, P. R. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c365 · Cited by 1,133 · see citing works
Holtzman, D. J., Powell‐Griner, E., Bolen, J. C., & Rhodes, L. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 1,110 · see citing works
A test of self‐determination theory in school physical education
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709904x22359 · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
Luepker, R. V. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530340032026 · Cited by 1,023 · see citing works
Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts.
Scherer, R. W., Langenberg, P., & von Elm, E. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000005.pub3 · Cited by 997 · see citing works
Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases
Egger, M., & Moher, D. (2011) · Cited by 977 · see citing works
Flynn, M. A. T., McNeil, D. A., Maloff, B., Mutasingwa, D., Wu, M., Ford, C., & Tough, S. C. (2006) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2006.00242.x · Cited by 925 · see citing works
Sallis, J. F., McKenzie, T. L., Alcaraz, J. E., Kolody, B., Faucette, N., & Hovell, M. F. (1997) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.87.8.1328 · Cited by 914 · see citing works
Health-enhancing physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents
Biddle, S., Gorely, T., & Stensel, D. J. (2004) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410410001712412 · Cited by 910 · see citing works
Physical education, school physical activity, school sports and academic performance
Trudeau, F., & Shephard, R. J. (2008) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-5-10 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Physical Fitness and Academic Achievement in Third- and Fifth-Grade Students
Castelli, D. M., Hillman, C. H., Buck, S. M., & Erwin, H. E. (2007) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.29.2.239 · Cited by 865 · see citing works
Story, M. T., Nanney, M. S., & Schwartz, M. B. (2009) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00548.x · Cited by 833 · see citing works
Kriemler, S., Meyer, U., Martin, E., van Sluijs, E. M. F., Andersen, L. B., & Martin, B. W. (2011) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090186 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Currie, C. E., Roberts, C., Morgan, A., Smith, R. G., Settertobulte, W., Samdal, O., & Rasmussen, V. B. (2004) · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Interventions for preventing obesity in children
Summerbell, C. D., Waters, E., Edmunds, L., Kelly, S. A., Brown, T., & Campbell, K. J. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001871.pub2 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
Pate (2006) · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.177052 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Tracking of Physical Activity and Physical Fitness across the Lifespan
Malina, R. M. (1996) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1996.10608853 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials
Mathieu, S. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1242 · Cited by 730 · see citing works
The physical activity, fitness and health of children
Boreham, C. A., & Riddoch, C. (2001) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/026404101317108426 · Cited by 721 · see citing works
Using Accelerometers in Youth Physical Activity Studies: A Review of Methods
Cain, K. L., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Dyck, D. V., & Calhoon, L. (2013) · Journal of Physical Activity and Health · doi:10.1123/jpah.10.3.437 · Cited by 716 · see citing works
Overweight prevalence and trends for children and adolescents
Troiano, R. P., Fegal, K. M., & Kuczmarski, R. J. (1996) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/00004703-199604000-00035 · Cited by 710 · see citing works
Booth, S. L., Sallis, J. F., Ritenbaugh, C., Hill, J. O., Birch, L. L., Frank, L. D., Glanz, K., Himmelgreen, D., Mudd, M., Popkin, B. M., et al. (2009) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2001.tb06983.x · Cited by 697 · see citing works
Interventions for promoting physical activity
Foster, C., Hillsdon, M., Thorogood, M., Kaur, A., & Wedatilake, T. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003180.pub2 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Review: Measurement and long-term health risks of child and adolescent fatness
Power, C., Lake, J., & Cole, T. J. (1997) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0800454 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Effects of a classroom-based program on physical activity and on-task behavior
MAHAR, M. T., MURPHY, S. K., ROWE, D. A., GOLDEN, J., SHIELDS, A. T., & RAEDEKE, T. D. (2006) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000235359.16685.a3 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
Effects of the FITKids Randomized Controlled Trial on Executive Control and Brain Function
Hillman, C. H., Pontifex, M. B., Castelli, D. M., Khan, N. A., Raine, L. B., Scudder, M. R., Drollette, E. S., Moore, R. D., Wu, C.-T., & Kamijo, K. (2014) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-3219 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Influence of parents' physical activity levels on activity levels of young children
Moore, L. L., Lombardi, D. A., White, M. J., Campbell, J. L., Oliveria, S. A., & Ellison, R. C. (1991) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80485-8 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Physical activity and obesity in children
Hills, A. P., Andersen, L. B., & Byrne, N. M. (2011) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090199 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
Lee, S. M., Burgeson, C. R., Fulton, J. E., & Spain, C. G. (2007) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00229.x · Cited by 653 · see citing works
The Economic Costs Associated With Physical Inactivity and Obesity in Canada: An Update
Katzmarzyk, P. T., & Janssen, I. (2004) · Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1139/h04-008 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Caballero, B. H., Clay, T., Davis, S. M., Ethelbah, B., Rock, B. H., Lohman, T. G., Norman, J. E., Story, M. T., Stone, E. J., Stephenson, L., et al. (2003) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/78.5.1030 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Effect of physical education and activity levels on academic achievement in children
COE, D. P., PIVARNIK, J. M., WOMACK, C. J., REEVES, M. J., & MALINA, R. M. (2006) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000227537.13175.1b · Cited by 611 · see citing works
Donnelly, J. E., Greene, J. L., Gibson, C. A., Smith, B. K., Washburn, R. A., Sullivan, D. K., DuBose, K., Mayo, M. S., Schmelzle, K. H., Ryan, J. J., et al. (2009) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.022 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Berenson, G. S., Wattigney, W. A., Tracy, R. E., Newman, W. P., Srinivasan, S. R., Webber, L. S., Dalferes, E. R., & Strong, J. P. (1992) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(92)90726-f · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Preventing childhood obesity: health in the balance
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0351 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Effectiveness of School Programs in Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Multilevel Comparison
Veugelers, P. J., & Fitzgerald, A. L. (2005) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2004.045898 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
Fuchs, R. K., Bauer, J. J., & Snow, C. M. (2001) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.1.148 · Cited by 583 · see citing works
Decreasing Sedentary Behaviors in Treating Pediatric Obesity
Epstein, L. H., Paluch, R. A., Gordy, C. C., & Dorn, J. M. (2000) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.154.3.220 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Tracking of Serum Lipids and Lipoproteins from Childhood to Adulthood
Webber, L. S., Srinivasan, S. R., Wattigney, W. A., & Berenson, G. S. (1991) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115968 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
PATE, R. R., Heath, G. W., Dowda, M. C., & Trost, S. G. (1996) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.86.11.1577 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Kriemler, S., Zahner, L., Schindler, C., Meyer, U., Hartmann, T., Hebestreit, H., Brunner-La Rocca, H. P., van Mechelen, W., & Puder, J. J. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c785 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Hagger, M. S. (2009) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870440701809533 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Effectiveness of Lifestyle Interventions in Child Obesity: Systematic Review With Meta-analysis
Ho, M. M., Garnett, S. P., Baur, L. A., Burrows, T. L., Stewart, L., Hutchesson, M., & Collins, C. E. (2012) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1176 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
(2008) · PubMed · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Janney, C. A., & Jakicic, J. M. (2010) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-1 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Effects of Health-Related Physical Education on Academic Achievement: Project SPARK
Sallis, J. F., McKenzie, T. L., Kolody, B., Lewis, M., Marshall, S., & Rosengard, P. (1999) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1999.10608030 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Harris, K. C., Kuramoto, L. K., Schulzer, M., & Retallack, J. E. (2009) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.080966 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
A Policy-Based School Intervention to Prevent Overweight and Obesity
Foster, G. D., Sherman, S., Borradaile, K. E., Grundy, K. M., Vander Veur, S. S., Nachmani, J., Karpyn, A., Kumanyika, S., & Shults, J. (2008) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-1365 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Effects of decreasing sedentary behavior and increasing activity on weight change in obese children.
Epstein, L. H., Valoski, A. M., Vara, L. S., McCurley, J., Wisniewski, L., Kalarchian, M. A., Klein, K., & Shrager, L. R. (1995) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.14.2.109 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Enjoyment mediates effects of a school-based physical-activity intervention
DISHMAN, R. K., MOTL, R. W., SAUNDERS, R., FELTON, G., WARD, D. S., DOWDA, M., & PATE, R. R. (2005) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000155391.62733.a7 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Effects of physical activity interventions in youth
Stone, E. J., McKenzie, T. L., Welk, G. J., & Booth, M. L. (1998) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00082-8 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Gutin, B., Barbeau, P., Owens, S., Lemmon, C. R., Bauman, M., Allison, J., Kang, H.-S., & Litaker, M. S. (2002) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/75.5.818 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Using the School Environment to Promote Physical Activity and Healthy Eating
Wechsler, H., Devereaux, R. S., Davis, M. K., & Collins, J. L. (2000) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.2000.0649 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Morris, F. L., Naughton, G. A., Gibbs, J. L., Carlson, J. S., & Wark, J. D. (1997) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.9.1453 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
The relationship between physical activity and self-image and problem behaviour among adolescents
Kirkcaldy, B. D., Shephard, R. J., & Siefen, R. G. (2002) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-002-0554-7 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Economos, C. D., Hyatt, R. R., Goldberg, J. P., Must, A., Naumova, E. N., Collins, J. J., & Nelson, M. E. (2007) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2007.155 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Raitakan, O. T., Porkka, K., TAIMELA, S. P., Telama, R., Räsänen, L., & Vllkari, J. S. (1994) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117239 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Lifestyle Intervention in Overweight Individuals With a Family History of Diabetes
Wing, R. R., Venditti, E. M., Jakicic, J. M., Polley, B. A., & Lang, W. (1998) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.21.3.350 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Ekelund, U., Sardinha, L. B., Anderssen, S. A., Harro, M., Franks, P. W., Brage, S., Cooper, A. R., Andersen, L. B., Riddoch, C., & Froberg, K. (2004) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/80.3.584 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Theoretical approaches to the promotion of physical activity
King, A. C., Stokols, D., Talen, E., Brassington, G. S., & Killingsworth, R. E. (2002) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00470-1 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Relations of moderate and vigorous physical activity to fitness and fatness in adolescents
Gutin, B., Yin, Z., Humphries, M. C., & Barbeau, P. (2005) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/81.4.746 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Fitzgibbon, M., Stolley, M., Schiffer, L., van Horn, L., KauferChristoffel, K., & Dyer, A. (2005) · Jornal de Pediatria · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.12.019 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Effects of Physical Activity on Psychological Variables in Adolescents
Calfas, K. J., & Taylor, W. C. (1994) · Pediatric Exercise Science · doi:10.1123/pes.6.4.406 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Verstraete, S. J. M., Cardon, G. M., De Clercq, D. L. R., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. M. M. (2006) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckl008 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Kimm, S. Y. S., Glynn, N. W., Obarzanek, E., Kriska, A. M., Daniels, S. R., BARTON, B. A., & Liu, K. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66837-7 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Parental and Peer Influences on Leisure-Time Physical Activity in Young Adolescents
Anderssen, N., & Wold, B. (1992) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1992.10608754 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Strength training effects in prepubescent boys
Ramsay, J., Blimkie, C. J. R., SMITH, K., Garner, S. H., MacDOUGALL, J. D., & SALE, D. G. (1990) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/00005768-199010000-00011 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Epidemiology of physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents
Sallis, J. F. (1993) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408399309527639 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Gortmaker, S. L., Cheung, L. W. Y., Peterson, K. E., Chomitz, G., Cradle, J. H., Dart, H., Fox, M. K., Bullock, R. B., Sobol, A. M., Colditz, G. A., et al. (1999) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.153.9.975 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Physical activity to prevent obesity in young children: cluster randomised controlled trial
Reilly, J. J., Kelly, L. A., Montgomery, C., Williamson, A., Fisher, A., McColl, J. H., Conte, R. L., Paton, J. Y., & Grant, S. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38979.623773.55 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Randomised controlled trial of primary school based intervention to reduce risk factors for obesity
Sahota, P., RUDOLF, M. C. J., Dixey, R., Hill, A. J., Barth, J. H., & Cade, J. E. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7320.1029 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Development of Physical Activity Behaviors Among Children and Adolescents
Kohl, H. W., & Hobbs, K. E. (1998) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.101.s2.549 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Dishman, R. (2004) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.007 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Association of Parent and Peer Support with Adolescent Physical Activity
Prochaska, J. J., Rodgers, M. W., & Sallis, J. F. (2002) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2002.10609010 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Boutron, I., Altman, D. G., Hopewell, S., Vera-Badillo, F., Tannock, I., & Ravaud, P. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.56.7503 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Carlson, S. A., Fulton, J. E., Lee, S. M., Maynard, L. M., Brown, D. R., Kohl, H. W., & Dietz, W. H. (2008) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2007.117176 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Tudor‐Locke, C., Ainsworth, B. E., & Popkin, B. M. (2001) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200131050-00001 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Role of physical activity in the prevention of obesity in children
Goran, M. I., Kd, R., & Lindquist, C. (1999) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0800880 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Robinson, T. N., Killen, J. D., KRAEMER, H. C., Wilson, D. M., Matheson, D., Haskell, W. L., Pruitt, L. A., Powell, T. M., Owens, A. S., Thompson, N. S., et al. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Ruiz, J. R., Rizzo, N., Hurtig‐Wennlöf, A., Ortega, F. B., àrnberg, J. W., & Sjöstróm, M. (2006) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/84.1.299 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
School-Based Interventions on Childhood Obesity
Gonzalez-Suarez, C., Worley, A., Grimmer-Somers, K., & Dones, V. (2009) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.012 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
School Physical Education: Effect of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health
McKenzie, T. L., Nader, P. R., Strikmiller, P. K., Yang, M., Stone, E. J., Perry, C. L., Taylor, W. C., Epping, J. N., Feldman, H. A., Luepker, R. V., et al. (1996) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1996.0074 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Tracking of activity and fitness and the relationship with cardiovascular disease risk factors
Twisk, J. W. R., Kemper, H. C. G., & van Mechelen, W. (2000) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200008000-00014 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Promotion of Physical Activity Among High-School Girls: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Pate, R. R., Ward, D. S., Saunders, R. P., Felton, G., Dishman, R. K., & Dowda, M. C. (2005) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2004.045807 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
A School-Based Intervention for Diabetes Risk Reduction
(2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1001933 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
New moves: a school-based obesity prevention program for adolescent girls
Neumark‐Sztainer, D., Story, M. T., Hannan, P. J., & Rex, J. (2003) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00057-4 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Effects of decreasing sedentary behavior and increasing activity on weight change in obese children.
Epstein, L. H., Valoski, A. M., Vara, L. S., et al. (1995) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.14.2.109 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Three-Year Maintenance of Improved Diet and Physical Activity
Nader, P. R., Stone, E. J., Lytle, L. A., Perry, C. L., Osganian, S. K., Kelder, S. H., Webber, L. S., Elder, J. P., Hoelscher, D. M., Feldman, H. A., et al. (1999) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.153.7.695 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
McKay, H. A., Petit, M. A., Schutz, R. W., Prior, J. C., Barr, S. I., & Khan, K. M. (2000) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(00)70095-3 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Carrel, A. L., Clark, R. R., Peterson, S. E., Nemeth, B. A., SULLIVAN, J. C., & Allen, D. B. (2005) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.159.10.963 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Promoting Physical Activity in Middle School Girls
Webber, L. S., Catellier, D., Lytle, L. A., Murray, D. M., PRATT, C. A., Young, D. R., Elder, J. P., Lohman, T. G., Stevens, J., Jobe, J. B., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.11.018 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
A school-based exercise intervention augments bone mineral accrual in early pubertal girls
MacKelvie, K. J., McKay, H. A., Khan, K. M., & Crocker, P. R. E. (2001) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1067/mpd.2001.118190 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Determinants of Exercise among Children. II. A Longitudinal Analysis
DiLorenzo, T. M., Stucky‐Ropp, R. C., Wal, J. S. V., & Gotham, H. J. (1998) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1998.0307 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Garcia, A., Broda, M. A. N., Frenn, M., Coviak, C. P., Pender, N. J., & Ronis, D. L. (1995) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.1995.tb03365.x · Cited by 315 · see citing works
School-Based Physical Activity Does Not Compromise Children's Academic Performance
AHAMED, Y., MACDONALD, H., REED, K., NAYLOR, P.-J., LIU-AMBROSE, T., & MCKAY, H. (2007) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000241654.45500.8e · Cited by 314 · see citing works
A Prospective Study of the Determinants of Physical Activity in Rural Fifth-Grade Children
Trost, S. G., Pate, R. R., Saunders, R., Ward, D. S., Dowda, M. C., & Felton, G. (1997) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1996.0137 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Fairclough, S. J. (2004) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyg101 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
The effect of multicolor playground markings on children's physical activity level during recess
Stratton, G., & Mullan, E. (2005) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.07.009 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Children's Pedometer-Determined Physical Activity during the Segmented School Day
Tudor-Locke, C. E., Lee, S. M., Morgan, C. F., Beighle, A. E., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2006) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000230212.55119.98 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Sallis, J. F., Patterson, T. L., Buono, M. J., & Nader, P. R. (1988) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114896 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Faigenbaum, A. D., Westcott, W. L., Loud, R. L., & Long, C. (1999) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.104.1.e5 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Prevention in the first place: schools a setting for action on physical inactivity
Naylor, P.-J., & McKay, H. A. (2008) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.053447 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Elder, J. P., Lytle, L. M., Sallis, J. F., Young, D. R., Steckler, A., Simons‐Morton, D. G., Stone, E. J., Jobe, J. B., Stevens, J., Lohman, T. G., et al. (2006) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyl059 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
An Intervention to Reduce Television Viewing by Preschool Children
Dennison, B. A., Russo, T. J., Burdick, P., & Jenkins, P. (2004) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.158.2.170 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Ruiz, J. R., Rizzo, N. S., Hurtig-Wennlöf, A., Ortega, F. B., W àrnberg, J., & Sjöström, M. (2006) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/84.2.299 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Evaluation of a Two-Year Middle-School Physical Education Intervention: M-SPAN
McKenzie, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Prochaska, J. J., Conway, T. L., Marshall, S. J., & Rosengard, P. (2004) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000135792.20358.4d · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Dwyer, T., Coonan, W., Leitch, D., Hetzel, B. S., & BAGHURST, R. A. (1983) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/12.3.308 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
MacKelvie, K. J., Petit, M. A., Khan, K. M., Beck, T., & McKay, H. A. (2004) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2003.12.017 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Corbett, M. S., Higgins, J. P. T., & Woolacott, N. F. (2014) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1090 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Donnelly, J. E., JACOBSEN, D. J., Whatley, J., Hill, J. O., Swift, L. L., Cherrington, A. D., Polk, D. B., Tran, Z. V., & Reed, G. W. (1996) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1002/j.1550-8528.1996.tb00541.x · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Determinants of Exercise in Children
Stucky‐Ropp, R. C., & DiLorenzo, T. M. (1993) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1993.1079 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
(1997) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.1997.tb06307.x · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Parental Behavior in Relation to Physical Activity and Fitness in 9-Year-Old Children
Sallis, J. F. (1992) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160230141035 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
The Fun, Food, and Fitness Project (FFFP): the Baylor GEMS pilot study.
Baranowski, T., Baranowski, J. C., Cullen, K. W., Thompson, D. I., Nicklas, T. A., Zakeri, I., & Rochon, J. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Perry, C. L., Stone, E. J., Parcel, G. S., Ellison, R. C., Nader, P. R., Webber, L. S., & Luepker, R. V. (1990) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.1990.tb05960.x · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Psychosocial predictors of physical activity in adolescents
Reynolds, K. D., Killen, J. D., Bryson, S. W., Maron, D. J., Taylor, C. B., Maccoby, N., & Farquhar, J. W. (1990) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/0091-7435(90)90052-l · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Environmental Influences, Physical Activity, and Weight Status in 8- to 16-Year-Olds
Dowda, M. C., Ainsworth, B. E., Addy, C. L., Saunders, R. P., & Riner, W. F. (2001) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.155.6.711 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Prevention of the Epidemic Increase in Child Risk of Overweight in Low-Income Schools
Coleman, K. J., Tiller, C. L., Sanchez, J., Heath, E. M., Sy, O., Milliken, G. A., & Dzewaltowski, D. A. (2005) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.159.3.217 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Story, M. T., Sherwood, N. E., Himes, J. H., Davis, M. A., Jacobs, D. R., Cartwright, Y., Smyth, M. H., & Rochon, J. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 244 · see citing works
A Family Approach to Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: Results from The San Diego Family Health Project
Nader, P. R., Sallis, J. F., Patterson, T. L., ABRAMSON, I. S., Rupp, J. W., Senn, K. L., Atkins, C. J., Roppe, B. E., Morris, J. A., Wallace, J. P., et al. (1989) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818901600207 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Correlates of Vigorous Exercise in a Predominantly Low SES and Minority High School Population
Zakarian, J. M., Hovell, M. F., Hofstetter, C. R., Sallis, J. F., & Keating, K. (1994) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1994.1044 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Faigenbaum, A. D., McFarland, J. E., Keiper, F. B., Tevlin, W., Ratamess, N. A., Kang, J., & Hoffman, J. R. (2007) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Andersen, L. B., Wedderkopp, N., Hansen, H., Cooper, A. R., & Froberg, K. (2003) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00145-2 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Ho, M. M., Garnett, S. P., Baur, L. A., Burrows, T. L., Stewart, L., Hutchesson, M., & Collins, C. E. (2013) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1453 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Children's activity levels and lesson context during third-grade physical education
McKenzie, T. L., Feldman, H., Woods, S. E., Romero, K. A., Dahlstrom, V., Stone, E. J., Strikmiller, P. K., Williston, J. M., & Harsha, D. W. (1995) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1995.10608832 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Macaulay, A. C., Paradis, G., Potvin, L., Cross, E. J., Saad-Haddad, C., McComber, A. M., Desrosiers, S., Kirby, R., Montour, L. T., Lamping, D. L., et al. (1997) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1997.0241 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
van Beurden, E., Barnett, L. M., Zask, A., Dietrich, U. C., Brooks, L. O., & Beard, J. (2003) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00044-0 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Physically active academic lessons in elementary children
Bartholomew, J. B., & Jowers, E. M. (2011) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.017 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Ardoy, D. N., Fernández‐Rodríguez, J. M., Jiménez‐Pavón, D., Castillo, R., Ruiz, J. R., & Ortega, F. B. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.12093 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Barriers to Children Walking and Biking to School—United States, 1999
(2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.11.1343 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Long-Term Effects of a Physical Education Curriculum and Staff Development Program: SPARK
McKenzie, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Kolody, B., & Faucette, N. (1997) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1997.10608009 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease: today's best buy in public health.
Morris, J. N. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Mo‐suwan, L., Pongprapai, S., Junjana, C., & Puetpaiboon, A. (1998) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/68.5.1006 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
McKay, H. A., MacLean, L., Petit, M. A., MacKelvie-O’Brien, K., Janssen, P. A., Beck, T., & Khan, K. M. (2005) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2004.014266 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Evaluation of a pilot school programme aimed at the prevention of obesity in children
Warren, J. M. (2003) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dag402 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Kipping, R. R., Howe, L. D., Jago, R., Campbell, R., Wells, S., Chittleborough, C. R., Mytton, J., Noble, S. M., Peters, T. J., & Lawlor, D. A. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g3256 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
A school-based intervention can reduce body fat and blood pressure in young adolescents
MCMURRAY, R., Harrell, J. C., Bangdiwala, S. I., BRADLEY, C., DENG, S., & LEVINE, A. (2002) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00348-8 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Stock, S., Miranda, C., Evans, S., Plessis, S., Ridley, J., Yeh, S., & Chanoine, J. (2007) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-3003 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
New Moves—Preventing Weight-Related Problems in Adolescent Girls
Neumark‐Sztainer, D., Friend, S. E., Flattum, C. F., Hannan, P. J., Story, M. T., Bauer, K. W., Feldman, S., & Petrich, C. A. (2010) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.017 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Impact Exercise Increases BMC During Growth: An 8-Year Longitudinal Study
Gunter, K. B., Baxter-Jones, A. D. G., Mirwald, R. L., Almstedt, H. C., Fuchs, R. K., Durski, S., & Snow, C. M. (2007) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.071201 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Modification of Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease
Walter, H. J., Albert Hofman, D., VAUGHAN, R. D., & Wynder, E. L. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198804283181704 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Müller, M., Asbeck, I., Mast, M., Langnäse, K., & Grund, A. (2001) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801703 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Kelder, S. H., Hoelscher, D. M., Barroso, C. S., Walker, J., Cribb, P. W., & Hu, S. (2005) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2004678 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Healthy Body/Healthy Spirit: a church-based nutrition and physical activity intervention.
Resnicow, K., Jackson, A., Braithwaite, R., Diiorio, C., Blisset, D., Rahotep, S. S., & Periasamy, S. (2002) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/17.5.562 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Hollar, D., Messiah, S. E., Lopez‐Mitnik, G., Hollar, T. L., Almon, M., & Agatston, A. S. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.165746 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Folate, DNA methylation and colo-rectal cancer
Pufulete, M., Emery, P. W., & Sanders, T. A. B. (2003) · Proceedings of The Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2003265 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Sahota, P., RUDOLF, M. C. J., Dixey, R., Hill, A. J., Barth, J. H., & Cade, J. E. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7320.1027 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Effects of exercise training on vascular function in obese children
Watts, K., Beye, P., Siafarikas, A., O’Driscoll, G., Jones, T. W., Davis, E. A., & GREEN, D. J. (2004) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.02.027 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Influence of Adiposity and Physical Activity on Arterial Stiffness in Healthy Children
Sakuragi, S., Abhayaratna, K., Gravenmaker, K. J., O’Reilly, C. M., Srikusalanukul, W., Budge, M. M., Telford, R. D., & Abhayaratna, W. P. (2009) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.123364 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Hip‐Hop to Health Jr. Obesity Prevention Effectiveness Trial: Postintervention Results
Fitzgibbon, M., Stolley, M. R., Schiffer, L. A., Braunschweig, C. L., Gomez, S. L., Horn, L. V., & Dyer, A. R. (2010) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2010.314 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Janz, K. F., Dawson, J. D., & Mahoney, L. T. (2002) · International Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-2002-28456 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Burgess, G., Grogan, S., & Burwitz, L. (2005) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.10.005 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
The Development of Self-Administered Physical Activity Surveys for 4th Grade Students
Sallis, J. F., Condon, S. A., Goggin, K. J., Roby, J. J., Kolody, B., & Alcaraz, J. E. (1993) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1993.10608775 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Salmon, J., Ball, K., Hume, C., Booth, M., & Crawford, D. A. (2008) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803805 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Bonhauser, M., Fernandez, G., Püschel, K., Yañez, F., Montero, J., Thompson, B., & Coronado, G. (2005) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dah603 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Dance for health: improving fitness in African American and Hispanic adolescents.
Flores, R. (1995) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Correlates of objectively measured physical activity in preadolescent youth
Trost, S. G., Pate, R. R., Ward, D. S., Saunders, R. P., & Riner, W. F. (1999) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00056-2 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Gentile, D. A., Welk, G., Eisenmann, J. C., Reimer, R. A., Walsh, D. A., Russell, D. W., Callahan, R., Walsh, M., Strickland, S., & Fritz, K. (2009) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-7-49 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Hoelscher, D. M. (2004) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.017 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Edmundson, E. W., Parcel, G. S., Feldman, H. A., Elder, J. P., Perry, C. L., Johnson, C., Williston, B. J., Stone, E. J., Yang, M., Lytle, L. M., et al. (1996) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1006/pmed.1996.0076 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
MacKelvie, K. J., McKay, H. A., Petit, M. A., Moran, O., & Khan, K. M. (2002) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.5.834 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Childhood obesity: future directions and research priorities
Hill, J. O., & Trowbridge, F. L. (1998) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.101.3.570 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Team Sports for Overweight Children
Weintraub, D. L., Tirumalai, E. C., Haydel, K. F., Fujimoto, M., Fulton, J. E., & Robinson, T. N. (2008) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.43 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
74 of the 1138 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- Caballero, 2001, The Pathways obesity prevention study: overview of design and measurements, FASEB Journal, 15, A1091
- Webber, 2007, Outcomes of a randomized controlled field trial to promote physical activity in middle-school girls: Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls, Circulation, 115, e221
- Aganovic, 2002, The effect of weight loss on cardiovascular risk factors: "Healthy Weight Loss School", International Journal of Obesity, 26, S200
- Bindler, 2000, Interventions to decrease cardiovascular risk factors in children: the Northwest Pediatric Heart project, National Academies of Practice Forum: Issues in Interdisciplinary Care, 2, 43
- Chow, 2001, Testing Ajzen's theory of planned behavior on the physical activity participatory behavior of Hong Kong children and youth: a pilot study, 373
- Crawford, 1997, An approach to providing dietary and physical-activity dairy instruction to adolescent girls enrolled in a longitudinal study: the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 65, S1297
- Eisenmann, 2007, Fatness, fitness, and insulin sensitivity among 7- to 9-year-old children, Obesity, 15, 2135, 10.1038/oby.2007.254 · DOI
- Ernst, 2003, Examination of physical activity during a physical activity intervention and recess, Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 74, A43
- Ewart, 1998, Effects of school-based aerobic exercise on blood pressure in adolescent girls at risk for hypertension, American Journal of Public Health, 88, 949, 10.2105/ajph.88.6.949 · DOI
- Faigenbaum, 2001, Plyometric training for children and adolescents, American College of Sports Medicine, December, 1
- Fairclough, 2002, Promoting lifetime physical activity through physical education. Are we providing the right opportunities?, British Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 32, 38
- Hastie, 2007, Impact of a sport education "obstacle course" season on students' cardiovascular fitness, Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 78
- Jackson, 2001, Effects of a physical activity programme on activity and motor skills in young children: a controlled trial, FASEB Journal, 15, A951
- Fullerton, 2007, Quality of life in Mexican-American children following a weight management program, Obesity, 15, 2553, 10.1038/oby.2007.306 · DOI
- Jones, 1988, Regular aerobic exercise and blood pressure in children. An efficacy school-based randomized clinical trial, American Journal of Epidemiology, 128, 898
- Jones, 2007, The effect of a 16-week implementation of intervention strategies into after-school activity lesson plans on the aerobic fitness and percentage body fat of children aged 8-14 years old, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41, 119
- Kaplan, 1996, Effects of a 3-month exercise and nutrition program for childhood obesity on anthropometrics, physical fitness, and serum lipids, International Pediatrics, 11, 31
- Kimm, 1997, Longitudinal assessment of physical activity (PA) in young girls, American Journal of Epidemiology, 145, S25
- Liskova, 2002, Long-term effectiveness of obesity intervention program in children, International Journal of Obesity, 26, S10
- Ludwig, 2004, Assessment of Calgary elementary physical education programs, Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 29 Suppl, S63
- MacConnie, 1991, The effect of parental inclusion in an exercise and nutrition intervention program, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 23, S30
- Mahon, 1993, The effects of daily physical education on health related physical fitness in first-grade children, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, March Suppl, A
- Mandigo, 2003, Physical activities available at Alberta schools
- McManus, 2008, Using heart-rate feedback to increase physical activity in children, Preventive Medicine, 47, 402, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Drews, 2009, Recruitment and retention strategies and methods in the HEALTHY study, International Journal of Obesity, 33, S21, 10.1038/ijo.2009.113 · DOI
- Mecredy, 1993, Efficacy and community development: heart health interventions and adolescents, Public Health and Epidemiology Report Ontario, 4, 16
- Metzker, 2000, The effects of a transtheoretical model physical activity intervention program on the physical activity behavior of female adolescents, Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 71, A
- Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services BoCDPCHP, 2003, Home to School: using handheld palm computers to gather information on environmental factors affecting walking to school among elementary school children, Health Education and Behavior, 4, 405
- Moya, 2011, Cost-effectiveness of an intervention to reduce overweight and obesity in 9-10-year-olds. The Cuenca study, Gaceta Sanitaria, 25, 198
- Nelson, 2011, Impact of dancing classrooms on elementary physical education: a school climate study of personal and social development, TAHPERD Journal, 79, 12
- Oxizoglou, 2005, A comparative study of a handball program and a physical education curriculum and their influence on the anthropometric characteristics formation of pupils aged 12-14, Inquiries in Sport & Physical Education, 3, 123
- Parlee-Hirth, 2002, California children's 5 a day - power play! campaign, American Journal of Health Promotion, 16, 371
- Peralta, 2009, Promoting healthy lifestyles among adolescent boys: the Fitness Improvement and Lifestyle Awareness Program RCT, Preventive Medicine, 48, 537, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.04.007 · DOI
- Ransdell, 2003, Increasing physical activity in girls and women, JOPERD, 74, 37
- Robinson, 2007, Stanford GEMS (Girls health Enrichment Multisite Studies): long-term efficacy of after-school dance and screen time reduction in low-income African-American girls, Circulation, 116, 56
- Rodgers, 2001, The Evaluation of a school-based obesity prevention program among fourth grade students
- Sabet-Sarvestani, 2008, The effect of dietary behavior modification on anthropometric indices in obese adolescent female students, Iranian Journal of Pediatrics, 18, 71
- Sacher, 2003, An integrated programme of nutrition, exercise and behavioural modification in a small group of obese 7-11-year-old children, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 62, 3A
- Saksvig, 2003, A successful school-based diabetes prevention intervention for native Canadian children, Diabetes, 52, A209
- McKenzie, 1993, Effects of a curriculum and inservice program on the quantity and quality of elementary physical education classes, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64, 178, 10.1080/02701367.1993.10608795 · DOI · Paper page
- Salmon, 2005, Reducing sedentary behaviour and increasing physical activity among 10-year-old children: overview and process evaluation of the 'Switch Play' intervention, Health Promotion International, 20, 7, 10.1093/heapro/dah502 · DOI
- Santiago, 2007, Health-related fitness changes in Hispanic elementary schoolchildren after 1 year of regular physical education, Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 78, A
- Schneider, 2009, Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study, International Journal of Obesity, 33, S60, 10.1038/ijo.2009.118 · DOI
- Shephard, 1985, Long-term studies of physical activity in children: The Trois-Rivieres experience, 252
- Telforda, 2009, The Lifestyle Of Our Kids (LOOK) project: outline of methods, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12, 156, 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.03.009 · DOI
- Theodorakis, 2008, Review of the applications of a health education program "I Do not Smoke I Exercise" to elementary, junior high school and high school students, Inquiries in Sport & Physical Education, 6, 181
- Trudeau, 1999, Daily primary school physical education: effects on physical activity during adult life, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31, 111, 10.1097/00005768-199901000-00018 · DOI
- Venditti, 2009, Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study behavior intervention component, International Journal of Obesity, 33, S44, 10.1038/ijo.2009.116 · DOI
- Wang, 2006, Obesity prevention in low socioeconomic status urban African-American adolescents: study design and preliminary findings of the HEALTH-KIDS Study, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 60, 92, 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602272 · DOI
- Westcott, 1995, School-based conditioning programs for physically unfit children, Strength and Conditioning, 46, 345
- Gutin, 2008, Preliminary findings of the effect of a 3-year after-school physical activity intervention on fitness and body fat: the Medical College of Georgia Fitkid Project, International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, 3, Suppl 9, 10.1080/17477160801896457 · DOI
- Wang, 2008, Cost-effectiveness of a school-based obesity prevention program, Journal of School Health, 78, 619, 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00357.x · DOI
- Yin, 2005, An environmental approach to obesity prevention in children: Medical College of Georgia FitKid Project year 1 results, Obesity Research, 13, 2153, 10.1038/oby.2005.267 · DOI
- Young, 2006, Effects of a life skills intervention for increasing physical activity in adolescent girls, Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160, 1255, 10.1001/archpedi.160.12.1255 · DOI
- Young, 2007, Policies and opportunities for physical activity in middle school environments, Journal of School Health, 77, 41, 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00161.x · DOI
- Arbeit, 1992, The Heart Smart cardiovascular school health promotion: behavior correlates of risk factor change, Preventive Medicine, 21, 18, 10.1016/0091-7435(92)90003-z · DOI
- Centers for Disease Control, 1997, Promote lifelong physical activity among young people, risk behavior surveillance - United States, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 46, 1
- Centers for Disease Control Chapter 6: understanding and promoting physical activity Surgeon General's Report on Physical Activity & Health 1999 210 59
- Dobbins M Tirilis D A synthesis of review evidence: an overview of systematic review evidence on the effectiveness of community-based interventions to promote healthy diet and nutrition, built environment, and social determinants of health Report commissioned by the Population Health Improvement Research Network (PHIRN) December 2011
- Gutin, 1997, Effects of physical training on cardiovascular health in obese children, 382
- Kannas, 1992, Leisure-time physical activity and related behavior in four European countries. Cuneo, Italy. In Cale L, Almond L: Physical activity levels of secondary-aged children: a review, Health Education Journal, 51, 192, 10.1177/001789699205100410 · DOI
- Klepp, 1993, The Oslo Youth Study: a 12 year follow-up study of a school-based health education program, 94
- Luszczynska, 2005, Social cognitive theory, 127
- Marella, 1992, Evaluation de l'aptitude physique: eurofit, batterie experientagle. Rome: Scuola Dello Slopoer. In Cale & Almond. Physical activity levels of secondary-aged children: a review, Health Education Journal, 51, 192
- McKenzie, 1996, School physical education: effect of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health, Preventive Medicine, 25, 423, 10.1006/pmed.1996.0074 · DOI
- Sallis, 1993, Project SPARK: effects of physical education on adiposity in children, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 699, 127, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb18844.x · DOI
- Stone, 1998, Effects of physical activity interventions in youth: review and synthesis, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15, 298, 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00082-8 · DOI
- Thomas H Siracusa L Ross G Beath L Hanna L Michaud M Effectiveness of school-based interventions in reducing adolescent risk behaviors: a systematic review of reviews Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) 1999
- Thomas, 2004, A process for systematically reviewing the literature: Providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions, Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 1, 176, 10.1111/j.1524-475x.2004.04006.x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., & Koffel, J. (2019) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/sfc38 · Cited by 3,696 · see citing works
Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B., PRISMA-S Group, Blunt, H., Brigham, T., et al. (2021) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z · Cited by 3,714 · see citing works
Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903183r · Cited by 1,592 · see citing works
Physical Activity for Cognitive and Mental Health in Youth: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms
Lubans, D., Richards, J., Hillman, C., Faulkner, G., Beauchamp, M., Nilsson, M., Kelly, P., Smith, J., Raine, L., & Biddle, S. (2016) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1642 · Cited by 1,548 · see citing works
Hilpert, M., Brockmeier, K., Dordel, S., Koch, B., Weiß, V., Ferrari, N., Tokarski, W., & Gräf, C. (2017) · Obesity Facts · doi:10.1159/000464105 · Cited by 1,185 · see citing works
The epidemiological burden of obesity in childhood: a worldwide epidemic requiring urgent action
Cesare, M. D., Sorić, M., Bovet, P., Miranda, J. J., Bhutta, Z. A., Stevens, G. A., Laxmaiah, A., Kengne, A. P., & Bentham, J. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1449-8 · Cited by 1,147 · see citing works
“In particular, promotion of physical activity in schoolbased settings may be beneficial given adequate resources [68], as well as being an important component of effective overweight prevention strategies in children [66].”
BackgroundKriemler, S., Meyer, U., Martin, E., van Sluijs, E. M. F., Andersen, L. B., & Martin, B. W. (2011) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090186 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Langford, R., Bonell, C. P., Jones, H. E., Pouliou, T., Murphy, S. M., Waters, E., Komro, K. A., Gibbs, L. F., Magnus, D., & Campbell, R. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008958.pub2 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
Hills, A. P., Dengel, D. R., & Lubans, D. R. (2015) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2014.09.010 · Cited by 705 · see citing works
Accelerating Progress in Obesity Prevention: Solving the Weight of the Nation
Glickman, D., Parker, L., Sim, L. J., Cook, H. D. V., & Miller, E. A. (2012) · Cited by 653 · see citing works
Implementation of school based physical activity interventions: A systematic review
Naylor, P.-J., Nettlefold, L., Race, D., Hoy, C., Ashe, M. C., Wharf Higgins, J., & McKay, H. A. (2015) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.034 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Influence of Pokémon Go on Physical Activity: Study and Implications
Althoff, T., White, R. W., & Horvitz, E. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6759 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Exercise/physical activity and health outcomes: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
Posadzki, P., Pieper, D., Bajpai, R. C., Makaruk, H., Könsgen, N., Neuhaus, A. L., & Semwal, M. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09855-3 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
Love, R., Adams, J., & van Sluijs, E. M. F. (2019) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12823 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Cumpston, M. S., McKenzie, J. E., Welch, V. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2022) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdac036 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Neil‐Sztramko, S., Caldwell, H. A. T., & Dobbins, M. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007651.pub3 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Self-citationLonsdale, C., Rosenkranz, R. R., Peralta, L. R., Bennie, A., Fahey, P., & Lubans, D. R. (2013) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.12.004 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Myths, Presumptions, and Facts about Obesity
Casazza, K., Fontaine, K. R., Astrup, A., Birch, L. L., Brown, A. W., Bohan Brown, M. M., Durant, N., Dutton, G., Foster, E. M., Heymsfield, S. B., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1208051 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B., & PRISMA-S Group (2021) · Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA · doi:10.5195/jmla.2021.962 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Costigan, S. A., Eather, N., Plotnikoff, R. C., Taaffe, D. R., & Lubans, D. R. (2015) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-094490 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Fraser, S. D., & Lock, K. (2010) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq145 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Cassar, S., Salmon, J., Timperio, A. F., Naylor, P., van Nassau, F., Ayala, A. M. C., & Koorts, H. (2019) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-019-0876-4 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Morton, K. L., Atkin, A. J., Corder, K., Suhrcke, M., & van Sluijs, E. M. F. (2016) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12352 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Srinivasan, S. M., Pescatello, L. S., & Bhat, A. N. (2014) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20130157 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Nathan, N., Elton, B., Babic, M., McCarthy, N., Sutherland, R., Presseau, J., Seward, K., Hodder, R. K., Booth, D., Yoong, S. L., et al. (2017) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.012 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Hoelscher, D. M., Kirk, S., Ritchie, L. D., & Cunningham-Sabo, L. D. (2013) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2013.08.004 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
McCrabb, S., Lane, C., Hall, A. E., Milat, A., Bauman, A. E., Sutherland, R., Yoong, S. L., & Wolfenden, L. (2019) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12845 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Norris, E., van Steen, T., Direito, A., & Stamatakis, E. (2020) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-100502 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Lonsdale, C., Sanders, T., Cohen, K. E., Parker, P. D., Noetel, M., Hartwig, T. B., Vasconcellos, D., Kirwan, M., Morgan, P. J., Salmon, J., et al. (2016) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3243-2 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Lai, S. K., Costigan, S. A., Morgan, P. J., Lubans, D. R., Stodden, D. F., Salmon, J., & Barnett, L. M. (2014) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0099-9 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Lau, W. C., Lau, E. Y., Wong, D. P., & Ransdell, L. B. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1533 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Messing, S., Rütten, A., Abu-Omar, K., Ungerer-Röhrich, U., Goodwin, L., Burlacu, I., & Gediga, G. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00055 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Hynynen, S.-T., van Stralen, M. M., Sniehotta, F. F., Araújo-Soares, V., Hardeman, W., Chinapaw, M. J. M., Vasankari, T., & Hankonen, N. (2016) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2015.1081706 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
“, & Tirilis, D. (2009). School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity a nd fitness in children and adolescents aged 6-18.”
BackgroundInfluentialYüksel, H. S., Şahin, F. N., Maksimović, N., Drid, P., & Bianco, A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17010347 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
“Some studies clearly demonstrate this potential [74,75].”
Sagner, M., McNeil, A., Puska, P., Auffray, C., Price, N. D., Hood, L., Lavie, C. J., Han, Z., Zhu, C. H., Brahmachari, S. K., et al. (2016) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2016.08.002 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Liu, J., Davidson, E., Bhopal, R., White, M., Johnson, M., Netto, G., Deverill, M., & Sheikh, A. (2012) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta16440 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Rößler, R., Donath, L., Verhagen, E. A. L. M., Junge, A., Schweizer, T., & Faude, O. (2014) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0234-2 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
“[6, 7] However, participating in sports bears a risk of sustaining an injury.”
BackgroundPuder, J. J., Marques-Vidal, P. M., Schindler, C., Zahner, L., Niederer, I., Bürgi, F., Ebenegger, V., Nydegger, A., & Kriemler, S. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d6195 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Jacob, C. M., Hardy‐Johnson, P., Inskip, H. M., Morris, T., Parsons, C. M., Barrett, M., Hanson, M. A., Woods‐Townsend, K., & Baird, J. (2021) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-020-01065-9 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Kipping, R. R., Howe, L. D., Jago, R., Campbell, R., Wells, S., Chittleborough, C. R., Mytton, J., Noble, S. M., Peters, T. J., & Lawlor, D. A. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g3256 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Wolfenden, L., Jones, J. Z., Williams, C. M., Finch, M., Wyse, R., Kingsland, M., Tzelepis, F., Wiggers, J. H., Williams, A. J., Seward, K., et al. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011779.pub2 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Direito, A., Jiang, Y., Whittaker, R., & Maddison, R. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4568 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Wolfenden, L., Barnes, C., Jones, J. Z., Finch, M., Wyse, R., Kingsland, M., Tzelepis, F., Grady, A., Hodder, R. K., Booth, D., et al. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011779.pub3 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Norris, E., Shelton, N., Dunsmuir, S., Duke-Williams, O., & Stamatakis, E. (2015) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.027 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Jones, M., Defever, E., Letsinger, A., Steele, J., & Mackintosh, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2019.06.009 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Lander, N., Eather, N., Morgan, P. J., Salmon, J., & Barnett, L. M. (2016) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0561-6 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Etiology, Treatment, and Prevention of Obesity in Childhood and Adolescence: A Decade in Review
Spruijt‐Metz, D. (2011) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00719.x · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Butner, K. L. (2013) · 141st APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 2 - November 6, 2013) · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Cohen, K. E., Morgan, P. J., Plotnikoff, R. C., Callister, R., & Lubans, D. R. (2014) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-11-49 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
“equipment, personnel, facilities and curriculum to promote activity [6,7].”
BackgroundOsei-Assibey, G., Dick, S., Macdiarmid, J., Semple, S., Reilly, J. J., Ellaway, A., Cowie, H., & McNeill, G. (2012) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001538 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Berghs, M. J., Atkin, K. M., Graham, H. M., Hatton, C., & Thomas, C. (2016) · Public Health Research · doi:10.3310/phr04080 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Resaland, G. K., Aadland, E., Moe, V. F., Aadland, K. N., Skrede, T., Stavnsbo, M., Suominen, L., Steene-Johannessen, J., Glosvik, Ø., Andersen, J. R., et al. (2016) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.005 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
“Given the documented health benefits children derive from increased PA levels (Strong et al., 2005; Janssen and LeBlanc, 2010; Dobbins et al., 2013) and the number of hours that children spend in school, educating “healthier” children seems a justifiable use of valuable school time.”
BackgroundBrooke, H. L., Corder, K. L., Atkin, A. J., & van Sluijs, E. M. F. (2014) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0215-5 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Borde, R., Smith, J. J., Sutherland, R., Nathan, N., & Lubans, D. R. (2017) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12517 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Wolfenden, L., Nathan, N., Sutherland, R., Yoong, S. L., Hodder, R. K., Wyse, R., Delaney, T. M., Grady, A., Fielding, A., Tzelepis, F., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011677.pub2 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Cao, M., Quan, M., & Zhuang, J. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16091533 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Influence of Friends on Children’s Physical Activity: A Review
Maturo, C. C., & Cunningham, S. A. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301366 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Robinson, T. N., Matheson, D., KRAEMER, H. C., Wilson, D. M., Obarzanek, E., Thompson, N. S., Alhassan, S., Spencer, T. R., Haydel, K. F., Fujimoto, M., et al. (2010) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.197 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
MacArthur, G. J., Caldwell, D. M., Redmore, J., Watkins, S., Kipping, R., White, J., Chittleborough, C., Langford, R. M., Er, V., Lingam, R., et al. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009927.pub2 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
A Review of Adolescent High-Intensity Interval Training
LOGAN, G. R. M., Harris, N., Duncan, S., & Schofield, G. (2014) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0187-5 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
“A degree of self-selection is likely to have occurred; these youth may have chosen to participate in school PE classes, whereas sedentary, inactive adolescents are likely to avoid school-based activity [32].”
BackgroundSex differences in sports interest and motivation: An evolutionary perspective.
Deaner, R. O., Balish, S. M., & Lombardo, M. P. (2015) · Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1037/ebs0000049 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
“Moreover, public health studies of physical activity generally do not attempt to distinguish sports from noncompetitive exercise (e.g., Dobbins et al., 2013; Van Tuyckom et al., 2010).”
BackgroundAdolescent Health Interventions: Conclusions, Evidence Gaps, and Research Priorities
Salam, R. A., Das, J. K., Lassi, Z. S., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.05.006 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Engelen, L., Bundy, A. C., Naughton, G., Simpson, J. M., Bauman, A., Ragen, J., Baur, L., Wyver, S., Tranter, P., Niehues, A., et al. (2013) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.007 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
The effects of the school environment on student health: A systematic review of multi-level studies
Bonell, C. P., Parry, W. E., Wells, H., Jamal, F., Fletcher, A., Harden, A., Thomas, J., Campbell, R. M., Petticrew, M. P., Murphy, S., et al. (2012) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.12.001 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Hebert, J. J., Møller, N. C., Andersen, L. B., & Wedderkopp, N. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134621 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Finch, M., Jones, J. Z., Yoong, S. L., Wiggers, J. H., & Wolfenden, L. (2016) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12392 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
An Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Children
Pate, R. R., Brown, W. H., Pfeiffer, K. A., Howie, E. K., Saunders, R. P., Addy, C. L., & Dowda, M. C. (2016) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.12.003 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Barriers to Providing Physical Education and Physical Activity in Victorian State Secondary Schools
Jenkinson, K. A., & Benson, A. C. (2010) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2010v35n8.1 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Tomkinson, G. R., Lang, J. J., Blanchard, J., Léger, L., & Tremblay, M. S. (2019) · Pediatric Exercise Science · doi:10.1123/pes.2018-0179 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Physical Activity Assessment and Counseling in Pediatric Clinical Settings
Lobelo, F., Muth, N. D., Hanson, S. K., Nemeth, B. A., OBESITY, S. O., LaBella, C. R., Brooks, M. A., Canty, G. S., Diamond, A. B., Hennrikus, W. L., et al. (2020) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2019-3992 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Vanhees, L., SUTTER, J. D., Geladas, N. D., Doyle, F., Prescott, E., Cornelissen, V., Kouidi, E. J., Dugmore, D., Vanuzzo, D., Börjesson, M., et al. (2012) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487312437059 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Jones, A., Armstrong, B., Weaver, R. G., Parker, H., von Klinggraeff, L., & Beets, M. W. (2021) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-021-01189-6 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Modelling resilience in adolescence and adversity: a novel framework to inform research and practice
Malhi, G. S., Das, P., Bell, E., Mattingly, G. W., & Mannie, Z. N. (2019) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-019-0651-y · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Executive Cognitive Function as a Correlate and Predictor of Child Food Intake and Physical Activity
Riggs, N. R., Chou, C., Spruijt‐Metz, D., & Pentz, M. A. (2010) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297041003601488 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Wolfenden, L., Goldman, S., Stacey, F. G., Grady, A., Kingsland, M., Williams, C. M., Wiggers, J. H., Milat, A., Rissel, C. E., Bauman, A. E., et al. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012439.pub2 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Effect of Active Lessons on Physical Activity, Academic, and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Martin, R., & Murtagh, E. (2017) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2017.1294244 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Pozuelo‐Carrascosa, D. P., García‐Hermoso, A., Álvarez‐Bueno, C., Sánchez‐López, M., & Martínez‐Vizcaíno, V. (2017) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097600 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Pawlowski, C. S., Andersen, H. B., Troelsen, J., & Schipperijn, J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148786 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Ruivo, R., Pezarat‐Correia, P., & Carita, A. I. (2016) · Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.10.005 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Improving health-related fitness in adolescents: the CrossFit Teens™ randomised controlled trial
Eather, N., Morgan, P. J., & Lubans, D. R. (2015) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1045925 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
“The literature has consistently reported difficulties in preventing unhealthy weight gain among adolescents using school-based physical activity interventions (Berkey, Rockett, & Colditz, 2008)(Dobbins et al., 2013), and resistance training interventions have also demonstrated mixed results (Dorgo et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialCesa, C. C., Sbruzzi, G., Ribeiro, R. A., Barbiero, S. M., Petkowicz, R. D. O., Eibel, B., Machado, N. B., Marques, R. D. V., Tortato, G., Santos, T. J. D., et al. (2014) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.014 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Gibson, J. L., Cornell, M., & Gill, T. (2017) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-017-9220-9 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Huh, J., Riggs, N. R., Spruijt‐Metz, D., Chou, C., Huang, Z., & Pentz, M. (2010) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2010.228 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
The impact of physical education on obesity among elementary school children
Cawley, J., Frisvold, D., & Meyerhoefer, C. D. (2013) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.04.006 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Rethinking children’s physical activity interventions at school: A new context-specific approach
Jago, R., Salway, R., House, D., Beets, M. W., Lubans, D. R., Woods, C. B., & de Vocht, F. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1149883 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity
Freak‐Poli, R., Cumpston, M., Peeters, A., & Clemes, S. A. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009209.pub2 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Meyer, U., Schindler, C., Zahner, L., Ernst, D., Hebestreit, H. U., van Mechelen, W., Rocca, H. B., Probst-Hensch, N. M., Puder, J. J., & Kriemler, S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087929 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Corder, K. L., van Sluijs, E. M. F., McMinn, A. M., Ekelund, U., Cassidy, A., & Griffin, S. J. (2009) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.08.025 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Ma, L., Ma, Y., Wang, H., Luo, J., Zhang, X., Luo, C., Wang, H., Zhao, H., Pan, D., et al. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1516-9 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
The Physical Activity 4 Everyone Cluster Randomized Trial
Sutherland, R. L., Campbell, E. M., Lubans, D. R., Morgan, P. J., Nathan, N. K., Wolfenden, L., Okely, A. D., Gillham, K. E., Hollis, J. L., Oldmeadow, C. J., et al. (2016) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.020 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
“The finding of a greater intervention effect on duration of MVPA activity at 24-month follow-up, compared with the previously reported 12-month result, strengthens previous suggestions that a dose–response relationship exists between length of intervention and extent of effect on adolescent physical activity.(11,21) F…”
ResultMclaughlin, M., Delaney, T., Hall, A., Byaruhanga, J., Mackie, P., Grady, A., Reilly, K., Campbell, E., Sutherland, R., Wiggers, J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/23180 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“We used the modified versions of published search filters for physical activity and sedentary behavior [28], engagement [20], and DHIs [20,29,30].”
MethodChesham, R. A., Booth, J. N., Sweeney, E. L., Ryde, G. C., Gorely, T., Brooks, N. E., & Moran, C. N. (2018) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1049-z · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Physical Inactivity: The “Cinderella” Risk Factor for Noncommunicable Disease Prevention
Bull, F., & Bauman, A. E. (2011) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.601226 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Katz, D. L., Cushman, D. M., Reynolds, J., Njike, V. Y., Treu, J. A., Walker, J., Smith, E., & Katz, C. S. (2010) · PubMed Central · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Costigan, S. A., Eather, N., Plotnikoff, R. C., Taaffe, D. R., Pollock, E., Kennedy, S. G., & Lubans, D. R. (2015) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.11.001 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Invernizzi, P. L., Crotti, M., Bosio, A., Cavaggioni, L., Alberti, G., & Scurati, R. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11020405 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Kellou, N., Sandalinas, F., Copin, N., & Simon, C. (2014) · Diabetes & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2014.01.002 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Eather, N., Morgan, P. J., & Lubans, D. R. (2013) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.019 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Eather, N., Morgan, P. J., & Lubans, D. R. (2013) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-68 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Pardo, B. M., Bengoechea, E. G., Lanaspa, E. G., Bush, P. L., Casterad, J. Z., Clemente, J. A. J., & García‐González, L. (2013) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyt040 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dobbins, M., Husson, H., DeCorby, K., & LaRocca, R. L.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- ORCID
- Dobbins, Maureen
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-28
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- CD007651-CD007651
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC8459921
- OpenAlex
- W2135517195
- Semantic Scholar
- face32f1e749dbd58a539175a8c46efc30d85a9a
- Cited by
- 1,358
- References
- 1,138
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2021-09-23)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- school-based physical activity intervention, children and adolescents, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, physical fitness, body composition, body mass index, sedentary time, health-related quality of life, intervention effectiveness, cardiometabolic health, adiposity, intervention components, physical activity guidelines, adverse events, school health promotion, physical education, recess, recess games
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Health Promotion, Humans, Motor Activity, Physical Fitness, Schools, Program Evaluation, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review