The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate social responsibility, country-level predispositions, and the consequences of choosing a level of disclosure
Open accessAbstract
We study the different levels of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures of the largest European firms. We find that firms are more predisposed to disclose more CSR information in countries with better investor protection, higher levels of democracy, more effective government services, higher quality regulations, more press freedom, and a lower commitment to environmental policies. Our analysis of the association of different levels of CSR disclosure with share prices indicates that a high level of CSR disclosure is associated with higher share prices, whereas a low level of CSR disclosure in sensitive industries is associated with lower share prices (compared to no disclosure). These results are also present when we analyse changes in CSR disclosure and are robust to the inclusion of an accounting quality measure in our model. The overall effect of the association of higher levels of CSR disclosure with higher share prices is stronger in countries with more democracy, more government effectiveness, better regulatory quality, and more press freedom. Therefore, market participants find CSR disclosures more informative in countries where investors are in a better position to voice their concerns and where there is better regulation and more effective government implementation of regulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00018-0 · Cited by 8,097
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors
Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35 · Cited by 5,152
Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation*
OHLSON, J. A. (1995) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x · Cited by 5,042
Kennedy, P. (1979) · Cited by 4,340
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.00000005 · Cited by 4,337
(2012) · Asian Financial Statement Analysis · doi:10.1002/9781119204763.ch4 · Cited by 3,821
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003 · Cited by 3,570
The law and economics of self-dealing
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.02.007 · Cited by 3,486
The market pricing of accruals quality
Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2005) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.06.003 · Cited by 3,087
Cited by
Deegan, C. M. (2019) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-08-2018-3638 · Cited by 328
Corporate social responsibility assurance and reporting quality: Evidence from restatements
Ballou, B., Chen, P.-C., Grenier, J. H., & Heitger, D. L. (2018) · Journal of Accounting and Public Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.02.001 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- de Villiers, C., & Marques, A.
- Venue
- Accounting and Business Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-08-20
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-195
- ISSN
- 0001-4788 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-4260
- OpenAlex
- W3124001893
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 43.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate social responsibility, country-level predispositions, and the consequences of choosing a level of disclosure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00014788.2015.1039476
- The paper
- de Villiers, C., & Marques, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility, country-level predispositions, and the consequences of choosing a level of disclosure. Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1039476
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.