The inflammatory response to stress and angiogenesis in liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: A randomized controlled trial comparing open versus laparoscopic approach
Abstract
Background This study evaluates the surgical stress response following laparoscopic and open liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Methods Patients with CRLM were prospectively randomized to receive open or laparoscopic liver resection (NCT03131778). Blood samples were drawn preoperatively and 24 h after resection. The serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-8 levels were measured. Furthermore, the mRNA levels of angiogenesis-related factors (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] and HIF-1) and inflammation-related factors (COX-2 and MMP-9) in both tumor tissue and normal liver parenchyma were detected. Results Twenty patients for each arm were included. Size of metastasis, type of resection, and neoadjuvant therapy were comparable between groups. Postoperative stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group. Higher levels of IL-6 were observed after the operation in both open and laparoscopic groups, although no differences in the post-operative levels between the groups was noted. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the mRNA expression of VEGF, HIF-1, MMP-9, and COX-2 between the treatment groups. No differences were observed in terms of overall survival and disease free survival. Conclusions The immunological effects of treatment were similar between the groups. Thus, the laparoscopic approach does not seem to significantly influence the surgical stress and tumor related factors in patients suffering from colorectal liver metastases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The review included 12 publications with a collective 589 patients, with a range of 14 to 128 patients.
“A final number of 12 publications with a collective 589 patients (range 14–128) were included in this review (Table 1) [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31].”
From The Role of Perioperative Interleukin-6 Serum Levels on Liver Dysfunction and Infectious Complications After Hepatectomy—A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
In Kasai et al. 2018, both laparoscopic and open groups had a significant postoperative increase in IL-6 levels relative to preoperative baseline values.
“Both groups had a significant postoperative increase in IL-6 levels in relation to preoperative baseline values, as previously demonstrated by Li et al.”
From The Role of Perioperative Interleukin-6 Serum Levels on Liver Dysfunction and Infectious Complications After Hepatectomy—A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
In Kasai et al. 2018, laparoscopic resection showed lower but not significant IL-6 levels compared to open resection on POD1 (39.1 vs. 98.9 pg/mL; p = 0.358).
“Again, laparoscopic resection showed lower, however not significant, IL-6 levels compared to open resection on POD1 (39.1 vs. 98.9 pg/mL; p = 0.358).”
From The Role of Perioperative Interleukin-6 Serum Levels on Liver Dysfunction and Infectious Complications After Hepatectomy—A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
Interdependent roles for hypoxia inducible factor and nuclear factor‐κB in hypoxic inflammation
Taylor, C. T. (2008) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2008.157669 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kofler, A., Trattner, M., Mairinger, V., Urban, I., Søreide, K., Stättner, S., & Primavesi, F. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17193120 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Similarly, a RCT published by Kasai et al. 2018 ( n = 40) compared the impact of laparoscopic vs. open procedures on inflammatory response and angiogenesis in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) [29].”
- Authors
- Kasai, M., Van Damme, N., Berardi, G., Geboes, K., Laurent, S., & Troisi, R. I.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University Hospital (BE)
- National Cancer Registry
- Corresponding author
- Troisi, Roberto I.
- Venue
- Acta Chirurgica Belgica
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-11-27
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 172-180
- ISSN
- 0001-5458 (ISSN-L)
- 2577-0160
- OpenAlex
- W2770002875
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta chirurgica Belgica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Keywords
- colorectal liver metastases, laparoscopic liver resection, open liver resection, surgical stress response, inflammation, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor, HIF-1, cyclooxygenase-2, MMP-9, gene expression in tumor tissue
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Biopsy, Needle, Female, Hepatectomy, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Laparotomy, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Period, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, RNA, Messenger, Colorectal Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Survival Analysis, Cytokines, Risk Assessment, Disease-Free Survival, Statistics, Nonparametric, Inflammation Mediators, Preoperative Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review