The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assisted reproduction technology (ART) is used worldwide, at increasing rates, and data show that some adverse outcomes occur more frequently than following spontaneous conception (SC). Possible explanatory factors for the well-known adverse perinatal outcome in ART singletons were evaluated. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane databases from 1982 to 2012 were searched. Studies using donor or frozen oocytes were excluded, as well as those with no control group or including <100 children. The main outcome measure was preterm birth (PTB defined as delivery <37 weeks of gestation), and a random effects model was used for meta-analyses of PTB. Other outcomes were very PTB, low-birthweight (LBW), very LBW, small for gestational age and perinatal mortality. RESULTS: The search returned 1255 articles and 65 of these met the inclusion criteria. The following were identified as predictors for PTB in singletons: SC in couples with time to pregnancy (TTP) > 1 year versus SC singletons in couples with TTP ≤ 1 year [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22, 1.50]; IVF/ICSI versus SC singletons from subfertile couples (TTP > 1 year; AOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.30, 1.85); conception after ovulation induction and/or intrauterine insemination versus SC singletons where TTP ≤ 1 year (AOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.21, 1.74); IVF/ICSI singletons versus their non-ART singleton siblings (AOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08, 1.49). The risk of PTB in singletons with a 'vanishing co-twin' versus from a single gestation was AOR of 1.73 (95% CI 1.54, 1.94) in the narrative data. ICSI versus IVF (AOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93), and frozen embryo transfer versus fresh embryo transfer (AOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76, 0.94) were associated with a lower risk of PTB. CONCLUSIONS: Subfertility is a major risk factor for adverse perinatal outcome in ART singletons, however, even in the same mother an ART singleton has a poorer outcome than the non-ART sibling; hence, factors related to the hormone stimulation and/or IVF methods per se also may play a part. Further research is required into mechanisms of epigenetic modification in human embryos and the effects of cryopreservation on this, whether milder ovarian stimulation regimens can improve embryo quality and endometrial conditions, and whether longer culture times for embryos has a negative influence on the perinatal outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
The origins of the developmental origins theory
Barker, D. J. P. (2007) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01809.x · Cited by 2,955
Shea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., Henry, D. A., & Boers, M. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009 · Cited by 1,755
Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta–analysis
Jackson, R. A., Gibson, K. A., Wu, Y. W., & Croughan, M. S. (2004) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000114989.84822.51 · Cited by 1,160
Helmerhorst, F. M. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.37957.560278.ee · Cited by 1,106
Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep
Young, L. E. (1998) · Reviews of Reproduction · doi:10.1530/revreprod/3.3.155 · Cited by 934
Fetal Origins of Adult Disease
Calkins, K., & Devaskar, S. U. (2011) · Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care · doi:10.1016/j.cppeds.2011.01.001 · Cited by 651
Baart, E. B., Martini, E., Eijkemans, M. J., Van Opstal, D., Beckers, N. G. M., Verhoeff, A., Macklon, N. S., & Fauser, B. C. J. M. (2007) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/del484 · Cited by 609
Elective Single-Embryo Transfer versus Double-Embryo Transfer in in Vitro Fertilization
Thurin, A., Hausken, J., Hillensjö, T., Jablonowska, B., Pinborg, A., Strandell, A., & Bergh, C. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa041032 · Cited by 597
Self-citation
Cited by
Pregnancy complications in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Palomba, S., de Wilde, M. A., Falbo, A., Koster, M. P. H., La Sala, G. B., & Fauser, B. C. J. M. (2015) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv029 · Cited by 691
Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hansen, M., Kurinczuk, J. J., Milne, E., de Klerk, N., & Bower, C. (2013) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt006 · Cited by 384
Vannuccini, S., Clifton, V. L., Fraser, I. S., Taylor, H. S., Critchley, H., Giudice, L. C., & Petraglia, F. (2016) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv044 · Cited by 379
Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates
Wong, K. M., Mastenbroek, S., & Repping, S. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.027 · Cited by 266
Argyraki, M., Damdimopoulou, P., Chatzimeletiou, K., Grimbizis, G. F., Tarlatzis, B. C., Syrrou, M., & Lambropoulos, A. (2019) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmz025 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinborg, A., Wennerholm, U. B., Romundstad, L. B., Loft, A., Aittomaki, K., Soderstrom-Anttila, V., Nygren, K. G., Hazekamp, J., & Bergh, C.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction Update
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-11-14
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 87-104
- ISSN
- 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2369
- OpenAlex
- W2139462280
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/dms044
- The paper
- Pinborg, A., Wennerholm, U. B., Romundstad, L. B., Loft, A., Aittomaki, K., Soderstrom-Anttila, V., Nygren, K. G., Hazekamp, J., & Bergh, C. (2013). Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.