Cited by 23Dental Health and Care UtilizationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeDental materials and restorations

Cost-effectiveness of caries preventive interventions – a systematic review

Open access
Davidson, Thomas, Blomma, Caroline, Bågesund, Mats, Krevers, Barbro, Vall, Martina, Wärnberg Gerdin, Elisabeth, Tranæus, Sofia·2021·Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of caries preventive interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted, following the PRISMA Statement. Four electronic databases were searched (final search 16 March 2020). Studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were independently critically appraised, by two reviewers in parallel. Data from each included study were extracted and tabulated: the analysis used a narrative approach to present the results of the estimated cost-effectiveness. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-six publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were of low or moderate risk of bias. Ten publications were economic evaluations, directly based on empirical studies, and the other 16 were modelling studies. Most of the studies concerned interventions for children and the most common were analyses of fluoride varnish and risk-based programs. Some of the studies showed both reduced cost and improved outcomes, but most studies reported that the improved outcome came with an additional cost. The results disclosed several cost-effectiveness evaluations of caries preventive interventions in the literature, but these target primarily children at high risk. There is a scarcity of studies specifically targeting adults and especially the elderly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00016357.2020.1862293

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, T., Blomma, C., Bågesund, M., Krevers, B., Vall, M., Wärnberg Gerdin, E., & Tranæus, S.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Malmö University (SE)
  • Odontological Research Unit, Public Dental Service, Region Örebro County, Örebro, Sweden
Corresponding author
Davidson, Thomas
Venue
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
Published
2020-12-28
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
309-320
ISSN
  • 0001-6357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-3850
OpenAlex
W3117063625
Cited by
23
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Odontologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (201800527)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
Keywords
dental caries prevention, cost-effectiveness, fluoride varnish, economic evaluation, caries risk assessment, adults and elderly
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Child, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Dental Caries, Dental Caries Susceptibility, Fluorides, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review