The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of visually induced self-motion on postural stability
Abstract
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the illusion of self-motion is a significant factor leading to spatial disorientation. OBJECTIVE: Under normal circumstances, self-motion is perceived in response to motion of the head and body. However, under certain conditions, such as virtual reality environments, visually induced self-motion can be perceived even though the subject is not actually moving, a phenomenon known as "vection". The aim of this study was to examine the possible influence of illusory self-rotation (circular vection) on postural adjustments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The subjects were 10 young females with no history of ocular or vestibular disease. Video-motion analysis was applied to measure postural movements during vertical optokinetic stimulation. RESULTS: For most subjects, movement of the visual surroundings induced head and body displacements in the same direction as that of the visual stimulus, regardless of the onset of self-motion perception. However, there was a significant increase in postural instability after the subjects began to perceive false self-motion in the opposite direction to that of the visual stimulus.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fushiki et al. (2005) found that postural sway increased once participants reported vection and was stronger after stimulus presentation compared to prior to stimulus onset.
“Results showed that postural sway was increased once participants reported vection. Also, postural sway was stronger after stimulus presentation compared to prior to stimulus onset.”
From Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? (2015) · cites this paper as Fushiki et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes
Lestienne, F., Soechting, J., & Berthoz, A. (1977) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00235717 · Cited by 583
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Fushiki H, 2000, Influence of fixation on circular vection. J Vestib Res, 10, 151, 10.3233/VES-2000-10304 · DOI
- Bronstein AM, 1986, Exp Brain Res, 63, 655, 10.1007/BF00237488 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.178.4066.1217 · DOI
- Lee DN, 1975, J Hum Mov Stud, 1, 87
- Cheung BS, 1989, Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 108, 336, 10.3109/00016488909125537 · DOI
- Clement G, 1998, Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 118, 466, 10.1080/00016489850154577 · DOI
- Fushiki H, 2000, J Vestib Res, 10, 93, 10.3233/VES-2000-10204 · DOI
- Young LR, 1975, Influence of head orientation on visually induced pitch and roll sensation. Aviat Space Environ Med, 46, 264
- Cohen B, 1981, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 374, 421, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb30888.x · DOI
- Bronstein AM, 1996, Neurology, 47, 651, 10.1212/WNL.47.3.651 · DOI
- Young LR, 1990, Aviat Space Environ Med, 61, 525
- 10.1207/s15327876mp0203_4 · DOI · Paper page
- Hettinger LJ, 1993, Presence, 1, 114
- Regan EC, 1994, Aviat Space Environ Med, 65, 527
- Dichgans J, 1973, Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 76, 339, 10.3109/00016487309121519 · DOI
- Diener HC, 1984, ElectroencephalogrClinNeurophysiol, 57, 134
- Paulus WM, 1984, Visual stabilization of posture. Physiological stimulus characteristics and clinical aspects. Brain, 107, 1143
- Murasugi CM, 1989, Exp Brain Res, 77, 183 —92, 10.1007/BF00250580 · DOI
- Van den Berg AV, 1988, Exp Brain Res, 70, 597, 10.1007/BF00247608 · DOI
- Ungs TJ, 1989, Aviat Space Environ Med, 60, 1099
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related?
Keshavarz, B., Riecke, B. E., Hettinger, L. J., & Campos, J. L. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00472 · Cited by 342
“In another study, Fushiki et al. (2005) exposed their participants to an upward or downward moving random dot pattern and measured vection onset times and postural stability before, during, and after stimulus exposure.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Fushiki, H., Kobayashi, K., Asai, M., & Watanabe, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Toyama (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Fushiki, Hiroaki
- Venue
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-64
- ISSN
- 0001-6489 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-2251
- OpenAlex
- W2108469006
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Keywords
- circular vection, postural stability, spatial disorientation, optokinetic stimulation, postural instability, virtual reality
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Dizziness, Female, Humans, Illusions, Photic Stimulation, Posture, Rotation, Space Perception, Spatial Behavior, User-Computer Interface
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
