Cited by 267Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsSimulation and Modeling ApplicationsVestibular and auditory disorders

Vection and Simulator Sickness

Hettinger, Lawrence J., Berbaum, Kevin S., Kennedy, Robert S., Dunlap, William P., Nolan, Margaret D.·1990·Military Psychology

Abstract

Simulator sickness has been identified as a form of motion sickness in which users of simulators exhibit symptoms characteristic of true motion sickness. In a fixed-base simulator, visual and vestibular sources of information specifying dynamic orientation are in conflict to the extent that the optical flow pattern viewed by the pilot creates a compelling illusion of self-motion, which is not corroborated by the inertial forces transmitted through the vestibular sense organs. Visually induced illusory self-motion is known as vection, and a strict interpretation of sensory conflict theory of motion sickness suggests that vection in a fixed-base simulator would be a necessary precondition for simulator sickness. Direct confirmation of this relation is reported in this article.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327876mp0203_4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Hettinger et al. (1990), eight of nine participants who reported VIMS also reported vection; of five participants who did not experience vection, only one reported VIMS.

    “Their results showed that eight of nine participants who reported VIMS also reported vection. On the other hand, of the five participants who did not experience vection, only one reported VIMS.”

    From Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? (2015) · cites this paper as Hettinger et al., 1990

  • Vection alone is not a sufficient condition for VIMS to occur.

    “However, as the same studies also show that many participants who reported vection do not experience VIMS, vection alone is clearly not a sufficient condition for VIMS to occur”

    From Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? (2015) · cites this paper as Hettinger et al., 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hettinger, L. J., Berbaum, K. S., Kennedy, R. S., Dunlap, W. P., & Nolan, M. D.
Venue
Military Psychology
Published
1990-09
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
171-181
ISSN
  • 0899-5605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7876
OpenAlex
W2088845896
Cited by
267
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Military Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Simulation and Modeling Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
vection, simulator sickness, motion sickness, sensory conflict theory, self-motion illusion, optical flow, vestibular perception, fixed-base simulator, visual-vestibular conflict
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aerospace Medicine, Aviation, Humans, Male, Motion Sickness, Optical Illusions, Proprioception, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review