Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 699

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statistical theory of nucleation, condensation and coagulation

Binder, K., Stauffer, D.·1976·Advances in Physics

Abstract

Starting from a master-equation description of dense gases, binary mixtures, etc., we derive theories for nucleation, coagulation and droplet growth by reformulating the dynamics in terms of ‘clusters’. This treatment is shown to agree quantitatively with computer simulations of the nucleation kinetics in the lattice gas model, and also gives a much better account of recent nucleation experiments on CO2 than previous approaches. The possible definitions of clusters, the appropriate coordinates for their description and their relation to bulk equilibrium properties of the system are outlined, and the effects of fluctuations on the properties of the clusters are investigated. Near the critical point the crossover between ‘classical’ and ‘non-classical’ expressions for the droplet formation energy is described in terms of ‘scaling laws’. In contrast to the Cahn-Hilliard-Langer theories of nucleation based on the concept of a coarse-grained free energy, no significant changes of static or dynamic behaviour at a spinodal curve are found, and it is concluded that the latter does not have a physical significance. Our derivations include the use of many cluster coordinates, and they are suitable for a straightforward application to many component mixtures (‘hetero-molecular nucleation’). We find that steady-state nucleation is formally equivalent to the problem of the electric current of a point unit voltage in a conducting medium, the conductivity tensor being given by the product of the equilibrium cluster distribution and the cluster reaction tensor. The nucleation rate is then related to the electric current at great distances from the origin in the space of the cluster coordinates. Non-stationary nucleation kinetics is treated also, general ‘time-lag’-estimates are given, and a special case is solved exactly, which justifies usual steady-state assumptions. Including terms which are non-linear in the cluster concentration we find that in general there is no clear distinction between nucleation and coagulation, and—particularly at high supersaturations—both mechanisms are important at the same time. This fact is also clearly borne out by the computer experiments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00018737600101402

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 699

Metadata

Authors
Binder, K., & Stauffer, D.
Venue
Advances in Physics
Published
1976-07
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
343-396
ISSN
  • 0001-8732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-6976
OpenAlex
W2027910325
Cited by
699
References
44
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical theory of nucleation, condensation and coagulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00018737600101402
The paper
Binder, K., & Stauffer, D. (1976). Statistical theory of nucleation, condensation and coagulation. Advances in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018737600101402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.