Cited by 21Fish Ecology and Management StudiesCensus and Population EstimationMarine and fisheries research

Evidence of Metapopulation Dynamics in Shortnose Sturgeon in the Southern Part of Their Range

Peterson, Douglas L., Farrae, Daniel J.·2011·Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Abstract

The shortnose sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum is one of the most endangered members of the sturgeon family because of overexploitation, depressed population levels, and a shrinking range. The lack of historical data on shortnose sturgeon populations has led to an increase in sturgeon research over the last three decades; however, most recent studies have not focused on southern populations. The objective of this study was to estimate the abundance, annual survival, and temporary emigration rates of shortnose sturgeon in the Ogeechee River, Georgia. Shortnose sturgeon were captured with gill and trammel nets for a mark–recapture analysis from 1 June to 31 August in each of the 3 years from 2007 to 2009. Over the three summers of sampling, we conducted a total of 864 net sets and captured 168 individual shortnose sturgeon with an additional 51 recaptures. Our analysis revealed that the best‐fitting robust design population models incorporated interactions among water temperature, dissolved oxygen, and total effort in which capture and recapture probabilities were set equal and temporary emigration parameters were set to zero or held constant. Abundance estimates (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 404 (175–633), 264 (126–402), and 203 (32–446) individual sturgeon for 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively. Population parameter estimates of annual survival and temporary emigration, combined with documented emigration and immigration of tagged individuals to and from the adjacent Altamaha River, provided evidence that the Ogeechee River stock is not discrete but possibly a metapopulation with the Altamaha River.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00028487.2011.638584

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peterson, D. L., & Farrae, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (US)
Corresponding author
Peterson, Douglas L.
Venue
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Published
2011-11
Volume
140
Issue
6
Pages
1540-1546
ISSN
  • 0002-8487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8659
OpenAlex
W2033930821
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Marine Fisheries Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
shortnose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum, metapopulation dynamics, population abundance estimation, annual survival, temporary emigration, mark-recapture, robust design, Ogeechee River, Altamaha River, threatened species, river fish populations, water temperature, dissolved oxygen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review