Evidence of Metapopulation Dynamics in Shortnose Sturgeon in the Southern Part of Their Range
Abstract
The shortnose sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum is one of the most endangered members of the sturgeon family because of overexploitation, depressed population levels, and a shrinking range. The lack of historical data on shortnose sturgeon populations has led to an increase in sturgeon research over the last three decades; however, most recent studies have not focused on southern populations. The objective of this study was to estimate the abundance, annual survival, and temporary emigration rates of shortnose sturgeon in the Ogeechee River, Georgia. Shortnose sturgeon were captured with gill and trammel nets for a mark–recapture analysis from 1 June to 31 August in each of the 3 years from 2007 to 2009. Over the three summers of sampling, we conducted a total of 864 net sets and captured 168 individual shortnose sturgeon with an additional 51 recaptures. Our analysis revealed that the best‐fitting robust design population models incorporated interactions among water temperature, dissolved oxygen, and total effort in which capture and recapture probabilities were set equal and temporary emigration parameters were set to zero or held constant. Abundance estimates (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 404 (175–633), 264 (126–402), and 203 (32–446) individual sturgeon for 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively. Population parameter estimates of annual survival and temporary emigration, combined with documented emigration and immigration of tagged individuals to and from the adjacent Altamaha River, provided evidence that the Ogeechee River stock is not discrete but possibly a metapopulation with the Altamaha River.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sampling methods have successfully captured shortnose sturgeon in Georgia rivers.
“These methods have successfully captured shortnose sturgeon in Georgia rivers (Peterson and Farrae 2011;Peterson and Bednarski 2013;Bahr and Peterson 2017;Ingram et al. 2020;Kleinhans and Fox 2024).”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Peterson and Farrae 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rider, H. J., Morgan, K. M., Bond, A. T., Nolan, J. D., Fox, A. G., & Hamel, M. J. (2026) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/s10641-026-01901-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Peterson, D. L., & Farrae, D. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (US)
- Corresponding author
- Peterson, Douglas L.
- ORCID
- Farrae, Daniel J.
- Venue
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1540-1546
- ISSN
- 0002-8487 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-8659
- OpenAlex
- W2033930821
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Marine Fisheries Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Keywords
- shortnose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum, metapopulation dynamics, population abundance estimation, annual survival, temporary emigration, mark-recapture, robust design, Ogeechee River, Altamaha River, threatened species, river fish populations, water temperature, dissolved oxygen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review