Cited by 17Fish Ecology and Management StudiesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

Fish Community Response to Habitat Alteration: Impacts of Sand Dredging in the Kansas River

Open access
Fischer, Jason, Paukert, Craig, Daniels, Melinda·2012·Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Abstract

Instream dredging, a common practice in rivers worldwide, can affect fish and fish habitat. We investigated the magnitude of these alterations and their influence on the fish community of the Kansas River, a large sand‐bed river. Fishes were collected monthly from June 2010 to June 2011 in Edwardsville and Lawrence, Kansas, from 12 reaches of three types: 3 actively dredged, 2 historically dredged (i.e., not been dredged for at least 1 month before sampling), and 7 nondredged control reaches. The reaches, each 1 km long, were sampled with bottom trawls, seines, and electrofishing. Water depths and velocities at all 12 reaches were measured with an acoustic doppler current profiler and interpolated in ArcGIS. Actively dredged reaches had proportionally more deepwater habitat (>3 m) and low velocity (<0.15 m/s) near the riverbed than control reaches. However, the mean proportion of shallow‐water habitat (<0.5 m), high velocities near the riverbed (>0.30 m/s), low‐velocity habitat (<0.25 m/s), and high‐velocity habitat (>0.75 m/s) were similar among all reach types. A canonical correspondence analysis was used to characterize relationships among habitat variables, the three reach types, and CPUE. Mean velocity and depth explained a significant amount of variation in species CPUE; however, reach type was not a significant factor for any of the gear types for any season. Our results show that dredging in Great Plains rivers can increase depths, but alterations to fish community structure was not evident, probably because many of these fishes are adapted to a range of habitat conditions and are highly mobile.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00028487.2012.703156

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Bramblett, R.G., T.R. Johnson, A.V. Zale, and D.G. Heggem. 2005. Development and evaluation of a fish assemblage index of biotic integrity for Northwestern Great Plains streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134: 624-640.
  2. Brown, A.V., M.M. Lyttle, and K.B. Brown. 1998. Impacts of gravel mining on gravel bed streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127: 979-994.
  3. Cross, F.B., and R.E. Moss. 1987. Historic changes in fish communities and aquatic habitats in plains streams of Kansas. Pages 155-165 in Matthews and Heins, editors. Community and evolutionary ecology of North American Stream Fishes. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
  4. DeGrandchamp, K.L., J.E. Garvey, and R.E. Colombo. 2008. Movement and habitat selection by invasive Asian carps in a large river. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137: 45-56.
  5. Falke, J.A., K.R. Bestgen, and K.D. Fausch. 2010. Streamflow reductions and habitat drying affect growth, survival, and recruitment of brassy minnow across a Great Plains riverscape. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139: 1566-1583.
  6. Gaeuman, D., and R.B. Jacobson. 2006. Acoustic bed velocity and bed load dynamics in a large sand bed river. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111: F02005.
  7. Galat, D.L., C.R. Berry, W.M. Gardner, J.C. Hendrickson, G.E. Mestl, G.J. Power, C. Stone, and M.R. Winston. 2005. Spatiotemporal patterns and changes in Missouri River fishes. Pages 249-291 in Rinne, J. M., R. M. Hughes, and B. Calamusso editors. Historical changes in large river fish assemblages of the Americas. American Fisheries Society Symposium 45, Bethesda, Maryland.
  8. Gerken, J.E., and C.P. Paukert. 2009. Threats to paddlefish habitat: Implications for conservation. Pages 173-183 in
  9. Gido, K.B., W.K. Dodds, and M.E. Eberle. 2010. Retrospective analysis of fish community change during a half-century of landuse and streamflow changes. Journal of North American Benthological Society 29: 970-987.
  10. Guy, C.S., P.J. Braaten, D.P. Herzog, J. Pitlo, and R.S. Rogers. 2009. Warmwater fish in rivers. Pages 59-84 in
  11. Harvey, B.C. 1986. Effects of suction gold dredging on fish and invertebrates in two California streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 6: 401-409.
  12. Harvey, B.C., and T.E. Lisle. 1998. Effects of suction dredging on streams: A review and evaluation strategy. Fisheries 23: 8-17.
  13. Haslouer, S.G., M.E. Eberle, D.R. Edds, K.B. Gido, C.S. Mammoliti, J.R. Triplett, J.T. Collins, D.A. Distler, D.G. Huggins, and W.J. Stark. 2005. Current status of native fish species in Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 108: 32-46.
  14. Hayer, C.A., and E.R. Irwin. 2008. Influence of gravel mining and other factors on detection probabilities of coastal plain fishes in the Mobile River Basin, Alabama. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137: 1606-1620.
  15. Holcik, J. 2003. Changes in the fish fauna and fisheries in the Slovak section of the Danube River: A review. Annales de limnologie 39: 177-195.
  16. Hoover, J.J., A. Turnage, and K.J. Killgore. 2009. Swimming performance of juvenile paddlefish: Quantifying risk of entrainment. Pages 141-155 in
  17. Hoover J.J., K.A. Boysen, J.A. Beard, and H. Smith. 2011. Assessing the risk of entrainment by cutterhead dredges to juvenile lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) and juvenile pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 27: 369-375.
  18. Hoxmeier, R.J.H., D.D. Aday, and D.H. Wahl. 2009. Examining interpopulation variation in bluegill growth rates and size structure: effects of harvest, maturation, and environmental variables. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138: 423-432.
  19. Hughes, R.M., J.N. Rinne, and B. Calamusso. 2005. Introduction to historical fish changes in large river fish assemblages of the Americas. Pages 1-12 in Rinne, J. M., R. M. Hughes, and B. Calamusso editors. Historical changes in large river fish assemblages of the Americas. American Fisheries Society Symposium 45, Bethesda, Maryland.
  20. Junk, W.J., P.B. Bayley, and R.E. Sparks. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Pages 110-127 in D.P. Dodge, editor. Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium. Canadian Special Publication in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106.
  21. Miranda, L.E. 2009. Standardizing electrofishing power for boat electrofishing. Pages 223-230 in
  22. Paukert, C., J. Schloesser, J. Fischer, J. Eitzmann, K. Pitts, and D. Thornbrugh. 2008. Effect of instream dredging on fish communities in the Kansas River USA: Current and historical perspectives. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 23: 623-633.
  23. Pflieger, W.L. 1997. The Fishes of Missouri: Revised Edition. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri.
  24. Quist, M.C., J. S. Tillma, M.N. Burlingame, and C.S. Guy. 1999. Overwinter habitat use of the shovelnose sturgeon in the Kansas River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128: 522-527.
  25. Quist, M.C., K.I. Bonvechio, and M.S. Allen. 2009. Statistical Analysis and Data Management. Pages 171-194 in
  26. Rempel, L.L., and M. Church. 2008. Physical and ecological response to disturbance by gravel mining in a large alluvial river. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66: 52-71.
  27. Schultz, D.W., J.E. Garvey, and R.C. Brooks. 2007. Backwater immigration by fishes through a water control structure: Implications for connectivity and restorations. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 27: 172-180.
  28. Ter Braak, C.J.F. 1995. Ordination. 1995. Pages 91-173 in
  29. Jongman, R.H.G., C.J.F. Ter Braak, and O.F.R. Van Tongeren editors. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  30. Trautman, M.B. 1981. Fishes of Ohio. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio.
  31. Van Rijn, L.C. 1984. Sediment transport, part III: Bed forms and alluvial roughness. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 110: 1733-1754.
  32. Wildhaber, M.L., S.H. Holan, G.M. Davis, D.W. Gladish, A.J. DeLonay, D.M. Papoulias, and D.K. Sommerhauser. 2011. Evaluating spawning migrations and predicting spawning success of shovelnose sturgeon on the Lower Missouri River. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 27: 301-308.
  33. Williamson, C.J., and J.E. Garvey. 2005. Growth, fecundity, and diet of newly established silver carp in the middle Mississippi River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134: 1423-1430.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fischer, J., Paukert, C., & Daniels, M.
Affiliations
  • Kansas State University (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Fischer, Jason
Venue
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Published
2012-10-15
Volume
141
Issue
6
Pages
1532-1544
ISSN
  • 0002-8487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8659
OpenAlex
W2109192482
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (publishedVersion)
  • K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Kansas State University
  • U.S. Geological Survey
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Keywords
sand dredging, fish community structure, habitat change, Kansas River, sand-bed rivers, current velocity, deep-water habitat, catch per unit effort

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review