Empirical Evidence of Fall Spawning by Atlantic Sturgeon in the James River, Virginia
Abstract
Due to overfishing and habitat alteration, the anadromous Atlantic sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus is severely depleted across its historic range. The James and York rivers in Virginia are the two rivers comprising the Chesapeake Bay distinct population segment, where Atlantic sturgeon reproduction has been confirmed. It is widely recognized that Atlantic sturgeon spawn in the spring throughout their range; however, there is debate over whether they also spawn in the fall. To determine if Atlantic sturgeon spawn in the fall, independent of the spring spawn, large‐mesh gill netting in the freshwater portion of the James River (above river kilometer 108) was conducted in the spring (April–June) and fall (August–October) for 3 years (2009–2011), resulting in the capture of 125 adult Atlantic sturgeon (three were recaptures) during the fall sampling, but none were captured during the spring. Field examination for sex and stage of maturity identified 106 mature males and one postspawned female. Sex was not determined for four fish, and due to time constraints, 11 were not examined. Forty mature males were externally tagged with Vemco© ultrasonic passives tags and movements were monitored with a Vemco© VR2W passive receiver array. Collection and tracking data showed that mature Atlantic sturgeon aggregate in the freshwater portion of the James River during the fall season, entering during August and out‐migrating by the end of November. No tagged fish were detected in the freshwater area of the river during the subsequent spring months. Though James River Atlantic sturgeon may spawn in the spring, we suggest there is strong evidence for an independent fall spawn, which should be considered in future management and recovery actions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fish using the navigational channel in the Savannah River estuary are vulnerable to vessel strikes.
“Fish using the navigational channel in the Savannah River estuary will be vulnerable to vessel strikes”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Balazik et al. 2012
Vessel strikes can result in injury or mortality to fish inhabiting navigational channels, with larger adult individuals being more susceptible to strikes.
“vessel strikes can result in injury or mortality to fish inhabiting navigational channels, with larger, adult individuals being more susceptible to strikes (Brown and Murphy 2010;Balazik et al. 2012;Hondorp et al. 2017;Demetras et al. 2020).”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Balazik et al. 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rider, H. J., Morgan, K. M., Bond, A. T., Nolan, J. D., Fox, A. G., & Hamel, M. J. (2026) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/s10641-026-01901-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Balazik, M. T., Garman, G. C., Van Eenennaam, J. P., Mohler, J., & Woods, L. C.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Department of Animal Science University of California 2409 Meyer Hall, One Shield Avenue Davis California 95616 USA
- United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Balazik, Matthew T.
- ORCID
- Balazik, Matthew T.
- Venue
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1465-1471
- ISSN
- 0002-8487 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-8659
- OpenAlex
- W2096399028
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
- Keywords
- Atlantic sturgeon, Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus, spring spawning, spawning season, anadromous fish, James River, freshwater migration, fish tracking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review