Cited by 47Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchIchthyology and Marine Biology

Empirical Evidence of Fall Spawning by Atlantic Sturgeon in the James River, Virginia

Balazik, Matthew T., Garman, Greg C., Van Eenennaam, Joel P., Mohler, Jerre, Woods, L. Curry·2012·Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Abstract

Due to overfishing and habitat alteration, the anadromous Atlantic sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus is severely depleted across its historic range. The James and York rivers in Virginia are the two rivers comprising the Chesapeake Bay distinct population segment, where Atlantic sturgeon reproduction has been confirmed. It is widely recognized that Atlantic sturgeon spawn in the spring throughout their range; however, there is debate over whether they also spawn in the fall. To determine if Atlantic sturgeon spawn in the fall, independent of the spring spawn, large‐mesh gill netting in the freshwater portion of the James River (above river kilometer 108) was conducted in the spring (April–June) and fall (August–October) for 3 years (2009–2011), resulting in the capture of 125 adult Atlantic sturgeon (three were recaptures) during the fall sampling, but none were captured during the spring. Field examination for sex and stage of maturity identified 106 mature males and one postspawned female. Sex was not determined for four fish, and due to time constraints, 11 were not examined. Forty mature males were externally tagged with Vemco© ultrasonic passives tags and movements were monitored with a Vemco© VR2W passive receiver array. Collection and tracking data showed that mature Atlantic sturgeon aggregate in the freshwater portion of the James River during the fall season, entering during August and out‐migrating by the end of November. No tagged fish were detected in the freshwater area of the river during the subsequent spring months. Though James River Atlantic sturgeon may spawn in the spring, we suggest there is strong evidence for an independent fall spawn, which should be considered in future management and recovery actions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00028487.2012.703157

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balazik, M. T., Garman, G. C., Van Eenennaam, J. P., Mohler, J., & Woods, L. C.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Department of Animal Science University of California 2409 Meyer Hall, One Shield Avenue Davis California 95616 USA
  • United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Balazik, Matthew T.
Venue
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Published
2012-10
Volume
141
Issue
6
Pages
1465-1471
ISSN
  • 0002-8487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8659
OpenAlex
W2096399028
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
Atlantic sturgeon, Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus, spring spawning, spawning season, anadromous fish, James River, freshwater migration, fish tracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review