Abundance and Size Structure of Shortnose Sturgeon in the Altamaha River, Georgia
Abstract
Endangered Shortnose Sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum inhabit large tidal rivers along the Atlantic coastline of North America, ranging from the St. John River, Canada, southward to the St. Johns River, Florida. Currently, long‐term assessments of the abundance and age structure of southern populations are completely lacking. To address this information gap, we assessed recent changes in Shortnose Sturgeon abundance and age structure by sampling with anchored entanglement gear in the Altamaha River, Georgia, during summer in 2004–2010. To estimate abundance, we used the Huggins closed‐capture model in Program MARK. We assessed size structure by interpreting the first, second, and third quartiles of the FL of individuals captured during each year. In total, we captured 1,737 Shortnose Sturgeon (72 recaptures). Total estimated abundance was variable, ranging from 1,206 individuals (95% lognormal confidence interval [CI] = 566–2,759) in 2009 to 5,551 individuals (95% CI = 2,804–11,304) in 2006. Much of the annual variation in total abundance was attributable to wide variations in juvenile abundance, which ranged from a low of 62 individuals (95% CI = 24–181) in 2009 to a high of 3,467 individuals (95% CI = 1,744–7,095) in 2006. Annual shifts in size structure were indicative of rapid population turnover, probably resulting from a combination of mortality and permanent emigration. Although the Altamaha River Shortnose Sturgeon population shares several characteristics with northern populations (e.g., variable juvenile abundance and stable adult abundance), our results suggest that southern populations are more susceptible to decline because of their accelerated life cycle and inherently lower abundances.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sampling methods have successfully captured shortnose sturgeon in Georgia rivers.
“These methods have successfully captured shortnose sturgeon in Georgia rivers (Peterson and Farrae 2011;Peterson and Bednarski 2013;Bahr and Peterson 2017;Ingram et al. 2020;Kleinhans and Fox 2024).”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Peterson and Bednarski 2013
Efforts outside of the suspected summer holding areas did not yield captures during the summer sampling period.
“Efforts outside of the suspected summer holding areas did not yield captures during the summer sampling period (Altamaha River: Peterson and Bednarski 2013;Savannah River: Bahr and Peterson 2017)”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Peterson and Bednarski 2013
Huggins models assume population closure, and prior studies have shown that shortnose sturgeon populations meet this assumption during summer months in southern rivers when movement of fish is limited.
“Huggins models assume population closure, and prior studies have shown that populations of shortnose sturgeon meet this assumption during summer months in southern rivers when movement of fish is limited (Hall et al. 1991;Peterson and Bednarski 2013;Bahr and Peterson 2017;Ingram and Peterson 2018).”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Peterson and Bednarski 2013
Prior studies assessing population abundances in coastal rivers of Georgia distributed sampling effort evenly throughout suspected summer holding areas as well as habitat above and below these areas.
“prior studies assessing population abundances in coastal rivers of Georgia featured effort that was evenly distributed throughout suspected summer holding areas as well as habitat above and below these areas.”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Peterson and Bednarski 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rider, H. J., Morgan, K. M., Bond, A. T., Nolan, J. D., Fox, A. G., & Hamel, M. J. (2026) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/s10641-026-01901-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Peterson, D. L., & Bednarski, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Peterson, Douglas L.
- Venue
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1444-1452
- ISSN
- 0002-8487 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-8659
- OpenAlex
- W2034458425
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Marine Fisheries Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
- Keywords
- shortnose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum, Altamaha River, population abundance, age structure, size structure, juvenile abundance, population turnover, emigration, mortality, threatened species, tidal rivers, southern populations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review