Cited by 11Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Density and condition of subyearling Chinook salmon in the lower Columbia River and estuary in relation to water temperature and genetic stock of origin

Roegner, G. Curtis, Teel, David J.·2014·Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Abstract

We examined the hypotheses that density and morphometric condition of subyearling juvenile Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha would decline during periods of high water temperature in the lower Columbia River and estuary. The hypotheses were tested using salmon density measurements and a condition anomaly calculated from residuals of the length–weight linear regression based on 5,536 subyearlings collected from brackish estuarine and tidal freshwater (TFW) habitats. We captured Chinook Salmon at all temperatures encountered (4.2–23.5°C). In the TFW zone, densities were highest at optimal temperatures and lowest at suboptimal and supraoptimal temperatures; in the estuary, density did not differ among temperature regimes. Fish condition was lowest in winter, when temperatures were suboptimal, and highest in summer, when temperatures were supraoptimal. Pairwise comparisons of fish condition between periods of optimal temperature (spring) and supraoptimal or stressful temperature (summer) showed little change in the estuary but a large, positive increase with temperature in the TFW zone. Similarly, we examined seasonal differences in the condition of 50–60‐mm fry and again found condition to be lowest in winter and highest in summer. Finally, using genetic information, we identified stock‑specific differences in migration timing and concluded that most large yearlings and many subyearlings migrated in late winter or spring and therefore were never exposed to high temperature…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00028487.2014.918055

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roegner, G. C., & Teel, D. J.
Affiliations
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Roegner, G. Curtis
Venue
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Published
2014-07-31
Volume
143
Issue
5
Pages
1161-1176
ISSN
  • 0002-8487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8659
OpenAlex
W1966686718
Cited by
11
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, water temperature, fish condition, length-weight relationship, juvenile density, brackish estuary, migration timing, seasonal variation, Lower Columbia River, Columbia River estuary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review