Status of the Shortnose Sturgeon Population in the Savannah River, Georgia
Abstract
The federally endangered Shortnose Sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum was once abundant in all major coastal river systems from the Saint John River, Canada, to the St. Johns River, Florida. During much of the 20th century, however, populations suffered major declines throughout their range from the combined effects of overfishing, pollution, and habitat loss. Although the species was a charter member of the Endangered Species Act, quantified population assessments are still lacking for many river systems throughout their range. Because river‐specific assessments are critical for evaluating species recovery, the objective of this study was to quantify abundance and annual recruitment of Shortnose Sturgeon occupying the Savannah River, Georgia. Anchored gill nets and trammel nets fished during slack tides were used to sample juvenile and adult Shortnose Sturgeon in their summer holding areas during 2013–2015. Huggins closed‐capture models in RMark were used to derive abundance estimates for each demographic group. The best models estimated that the Savannah River contained 81 (95% CI = 27–264) age‐1 juveniles in 2013, 270 (162–468) in 2014, and 245 (104–691) in 2015. The models also estimated the river to contain 486 (198–1,273) age‐2+ juveniles in 2013, 123 (69–235) in 2014, and 187 (81–526) in 2015. Similarly, the adult population was estimated to be 1,865 (784–4,694) individuals in 2013, 1,564 (1,005–2,513) in 2014, and 940 (535–1,753) in 2015. The results of this study provide the first population estimates available for Shortnose Sturgeon in the Savannah River. Additionally, the results suggest that the Savannah River likely contains the second largest population of Shortnose Sturgeon in Georgia. Future studies are needed in the Savannah River and other South Atlantic river systems to better evaluate Shortnose Sturgeon recovery status and the effects of river‐specific anthropogenic modifications. Received June 27, 2016; accepted September 29, 2016 Published online December 2, 2016
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior studies assessing population abundances in coastal rivers of Georgia distributed sampling effort evenly throughout suspected summer holding areas as well as habitat above and below these areas.
“prior studies assessing population abundances in coastal rivers of Georgia featured effort that was evenly distributed throughout suspected summer holding areas as well as habitat above and below these areas.”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Bahr and Peterson 2017
Huggins models assume population closure, and prior studies have shown that shortnose sturgeon populations meet this assumption during summer months in southern rivers when movement of fish is limited.
“Huggins models assume population closure, and prior studies have shown that populations of shortnose sturgeon meet this assumption during summer months in southern rivers when movement of fish is limited (Hall et al. 1991;Peterson and Bednarski 2013;Bahr and Peterson 2017;Ingram and Peterson 2018).”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Bahr and Peterson 2017
Efforts outside of the suspected summer holding areas did not yield captures during the summer sampling period.
“Efforts outside of the suspected summer holding areas did not yield captures during the summer sampling period (Altamaha River: Peterson and Bednarski 2013;Savannah River: Bahr and Peterson 2017)”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Bahr and Peterson 2017
The Savannah River is presumed to contain the second largest shortnose sturgeon population in the southern extent of the species' current range, with a 2013 estimate as large as 2432 individuals.
“The Savannah River is presumed to contain the second largest shortnose sturgeon population in the southern extent of the species' current range, with a 2013 estimate putting total population abundance as large as 2432 individuals (Bahr and Peterson 2017).”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Bahr and Peterson 2017
The sampling methods have successfully captured shortnose sturgeon in Georgia rivers.
“These methods have successfully captured shortnose sturgeon in Georgia rivers (Peterson and Farrae 2011;Peterson and Bednarski 2013;Bahr and Peterson 2017;Ingram et al. 2020;Kleinhans and Fox 2024).”
From Assessing shortnose sturgeon response to estuarine dredging in the Savannah River using a before-after control-impact (BACI) approach (2026) · cites this paper as Bahr and Peterson 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rider, H. J., Morgan, K. M., Bond, A. T., Nolan, J. D., Fox, A. G., & Hamel, M. J. (2026) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/s10641-026-01901-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bahr, D. L., & Peterson, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Peterson, Douglas L.
- Venue
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-12-02
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-98
- ISSN
- 0002-8487 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-8659
- OpenAlex
- W2557901534
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- National Marine Fisheries Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Keywords
- shortnose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum, population abundance, recruitment (biology), threatened species, Savannah River, juvenile sturgeon, species recovery, overfishing, habitat loss, anthropogenic impacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review