The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Solution of a Ranking Problem from Binary Comparisons
Abstract
(1957). Solution of a Ranking Problem from Binary Comparisons. The American Mathematical Monthly: Vol. 64, No. 8P2, pp. 28-33.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Binary-Choice Constraints and Random Utility Indicators (1960)
Marschak, J. (1974) · Economic Information, Decision, and Prediction · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-9276-0_9 · Cited by 431
The Perron–Frobenius Theorem and the Ranking of Football Teams
Keener, J. P. (1993) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/1035004 · Cited by 274
Stochastic models of choice behavior
Becker, G. M., Degroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (2007) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830080106 · Cited by 262
A Revealed Preference Ranking of U.S. Colleges and Universities *
Avery, C. N., Glickman, M. E., Hoxby, C. M., & Metrick, A. (2013) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjs043 · Cited by 97
Uncertainty quantification in the Bradley–Terry–Luce model
Gao, C., Shen, Y., & Zhang, A. Y. (2023) · Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA · doi:10.1093/imaiai/iaac032 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Ford, L. R.
- Venue
- The American Mathematical Monthly
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1957-10
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 8P2
- Pages
- 28-33
- ISSN
- 0002-9890 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-0972
- OpenAlex
- W2320532185
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solution of a Ranking Problem from Binary Comparisons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00029890.1957.11989117
- The paper
- Ford, L. R. (1957). Solution of a Ranking Problem from Binary Comparisons. The American Mathematical Monthly. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1957.11989117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
