The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Isn't Everyone a Bayesian?
Abstract
Originally a talk delivered at a conference on Bayesian statistics, this article attempts to answer the following question: why is most scientific data analysis carried out in a non-Bayesian framework? The argument consists mainly of some practical examples of data analysis, in which the Bayesian approach is difficult but Fisherian/frequentist solutions are relatively easy. There is a brief discussion of objectivity in statistical analyses and of the difficulties of achieving objectivity within a Bayesian framework. The article ends with a list of practical advantages of Fisherian/frequentist methods, which so far seem to have outweighed the philosophical superiority of Bayesianism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Self-citationJeffreys, H., Moran, P. A. P., & Chatfield, C. (1922) · Nature · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198503682.001.0001 · Cited by 7,878
EFRON, B., & HINKLEY, D. V. (1978) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/65.3.457 · Cited by 952
Self-citationThe Estimation of Probabilities: An Essay on Modern Bayesian Methods
Sparks, J. N., & Good, I. J. (1967) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162122 · Cited by 528
The Estimation of Probabilities: An Essay on Modern Bayesian Methods
Hill, B. M., & Good, I. J. (1965) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2283422 · Cited by 337
Scoring Rules and the Inevitability of Probability
Lindley, D. V. (1982) · International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique · doi:10.2307/1402448 · Cited by 334
Interactive Elicitation of Opinion for a Normal Linear Model
Kadane, J. B., Dickey, J. M., Winkler, R. L., Smith, W. S., & Peters, S. C. (1980) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1980.10477562 · Cited by 294
On the coverage probability of confidence sets based on a prior distribution
Stein, C. (1985) · Banach Center Publications · doi:10.4064/-16-1-485-514 · Cited by 136
Maximum Likelihood and Decision Theory
Efron, B. (1982) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176345778 · Cited by 107
Self-citationThe Future of Statistics: A Bayesian 21st Century
Lindley, D. V. (1975) · Advances in Applied Probability · doi:10.2307/1426315 · Cited by 72
Cited by
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194105 · Cited by 2,490
(2013) · Cited by 1,351
The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal Rules
Kass, R. E., & Wasserman, L. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10477003 · Cited by 1,308
Statistical data analysis in the computer age
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5018.390 · Cited by 1,192
Self-citationEllison, A. M. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00603.x · Cited by 786
Metadata
- Authors
- Efron, B.
- Venue
- The American Statistician
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1986-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2731
- OpenAlex
- W2017529320
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 12.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Isn't Everyone a Bayesian? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00031305.1986.10475342
- The paper
- Efron, B. (1986). Why Isn't Everyone a Bayesian? The American Statistician. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1986.10475342
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
