The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Home-Court Advantage: How Large is it, and Does it Vary from Team to Team?
Abstract
College basketball fans often speculate on the extent and nature of the home-court advantage. In this article, it is shown how questions about the size of the home-court advantage and about team-to-team differences in the home-court advantage can be addressed by fitting three different linear models to the outcomes of college basketball games. This approach was applied to data from the 1991–1992 college basketball season. The advantage of playing at home (in relation to playing on a neutral court) was estimated to be 4.68 ± 0.28 points. The effect of team-to-team differences in the home-court advantage was found to be relatively small.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The assumption of the constant home effect has been validated and tested on several occasions in basketball (Harville & Smith (1994)).”
From Predictions of european basketball match results with machine learning algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as Harville & Smith (1994)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1080/01621459.1977.10480991 · DOI
- Harville, D. A. “Football Ratings and Predictions via Linear Models”. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association. pp.74–82.
- 1991, Official 1992 NCAA Basketball
- Sallas W. M., 1988, Bayesian Analysis of Times Series and Dynamic Models, 477
- Searle S. R., 1971, Linear Models
- Stefani R. T., 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 7, 117, 10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309667 · DOI
- Stefani R. T., 1980, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 10, 116, 10.1109/TSMC.1980.4308442 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predictions of european basketball match results with machine learning algorithms
Lampis, T., Ioannis, N., Vasilios, V., & Stavrianna, D. (2023) · Journal of Sports Analytics · doi:10.3233/jsa-220639 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Harville, D. A., & Smith, M. H.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- ORCID
- Smith, Michael H.
- Venue
- The American Statistician
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-28
- ISSN
- 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2731
- OpenAlex
- W2022639594
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Statistician (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Keywords
- home court advantage, college basketball, sports statistics, linear models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Home-Court Advantage: How Large is it, and Does it Vary from Team to Team? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00031305.1994.10476013
- The paper
- Harville, D. A., & Smith, M. H. (1994). The Home-Court Advantage: How Large is it, and Does it Vary from Team to Team? The American Statistician. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1994.10476013