The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bookmakers’ mispricing of the disappeared home advantage in the German Bundesliga after the COVID-19 break
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Teams in the top German league, the Bundesliga, experienced a decrease in home team goals and an increase in away team goals during the ghost games induced by Covid-19 compared to earlier seasons (Winkelmann et al., 2021).”
From Home advantage and mispricing in indoor sports’ ghost games: the case of European basketball (2023) · cites this paper as Winkelmann et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2018.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Bryson A., 2021, Economics Letters
- 10.1016/j.jbef.2018.01.010 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9485.00151 · DOI
- 10.1177/1527002504266154 · DOI
- 10.5750/jgbe.v7i2.630 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.03.005 · DOI
- Core Team R., 2019, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
- 10.1123/jsep.14.1.13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.31219/osf.io/hczkj · DOI
- 10.1080/00036846.2017.1418082 · DOI
- 10.1111/sjoe.12036 · DOI
- Dilger, A., and L. Vischer (2020). “No Home Bias in Ghost Games”.Discussion Paper of the Institute for Organisational Economics. · DOI
- 10.1111/joes.12106 · DOI
- Endrich, M., and T. Gesche (2020). “Home-bias in Referee Decisions: Evidence From’ghost Matches’ during the Covid-19 Pandemic”.Center for Law & Economics Working Paper Series. · DOI
- 10.2307/2325486 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ecin.12404 · DOI
- Fischer, K., and J. Haucap (2020). “Does Crowd Support Drive the Home Advantage in Professional Soccer? Evidence from German Ghost Games during the COVID-19 Pandemic”. Technical report, DICE Discussion Paper. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2005.03.003 · DOI
- 10.1080/00036840701522895 · DOI
- 10.4284/0038-4038-78.2.502 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.qref.2019.05.016 · DOI
- 10.1162/0034653053970267 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2012.00601.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00641.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9485.2011.00557.x · DOI
- 10.1080/16184742.2018.1530689 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10260-004-0093-3 · DOI
- Pollard R., 2006, Journal of Sport Behavior, 29, 169
- 10.1080/1612197X.2014.888245 · DOI
- 10.2307/2554281 · DOI
- Reade J. J., 2020, Echoes: What Happens When Football Is Played behind Closed Doors?
- 10.2307/2577461 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.10.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00013-8 · DOI
- 10.1002/for.1085 · DOI
Cited by
Home advantage and mispricing in indoor sports’ ghost games: the case of European basketball
De Angelis, L., & Reade, J. J. (2023) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-022-04950-7 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Winkelmann, D., Deutscher, C., & Ötting, M.
- Venue
- Applied Economics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-02-09
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 3054-3064
- ISSN
- 0003-6846
- 1466-4283
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (431536450)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.