Cited by 41Ancient Near East HistoryAncient Egypt and ArchaeologyClassical Antiquity Studies

The White Obelisk and the Problem of Historical Narrative in the Art of Assyria

Pittman, Holly·1996·The Art Bulletin

Abstract

The narrative imagery carved on the sides of the White Obelisk in the British Museum is shown to be a direct copy of a program that lined the walls of a long, narrow room in a palace of an unknown Assyrian king. As a record of a lost architectural program the Obelisk composition is used to illuminate the poorly known beginnings of Assyrian visual historical narrative in the late Middle Assyrian period of the twelfth and eleventh centuries b.c.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00043079.1996.10786686

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Pittman, H.
Corresponding author
Pittman, Holly
Venue
The Art Bulletin
Published
1996-06
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
334-355
ISSN
  • 0004-3079 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-6478
OpenAlex
W2013904845
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 13 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Art Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
Keywords
Assyrian art, historical narratives, narrative imagery, Middle Assyrian period, architectural program, British Museum, palace architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review