Cited by 315Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies

Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate

Tam Cho, Wendy K., Gimpel, James G., Hui, Iris S.·2013·Annals of the Association of American Geographers

Abstract

Questions have been raised in recent years about the extent to which the nation is segregated by the political preferences of its electorate. Some have argued that internal migration selects either directly or indirectly on political criteria and thereby produces increasingly one-sided Republican and Democratic neighborhoods. We are among the first to empirically examine voter migration on a large scale. Relying on data for millions of partisan migrants across seven states, we show that partisans relocate based on destination characteristics such as racial composition, income, and population density but additionally prefer to relocate in areas populated with copartisans. This tendency is stronger among Republicans but is also true of Democratic registrants. Whether the role of partisanship is central or ancillary, if it is any part of the decision process it has the potential to make important imprints on the political landscape of the United States.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00045608.2012.720229

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ideological homogeneity of social networks is enhanced by structural dynamics such as geographic sorting, the growing politicization of the rural-urban divide, and 'lifestyle' differences that are correlated with political orientation.

    “The ideological homogeneity of social networks is enhanced by structural dynamics such as geographic sorting209–211, the growing politicization of the rural–urban divide212,213, and ‘lifestyle’ differences that are correlated with political orientation107,214–216”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 108 · Cited by 315

Authors
Tam Cho, W. K., Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Annals of the Association of American Geographers
Published
2012-10-15
Volume
103
Issue
4
Pages
856-870
ISSN
  • 0004-5608 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8306
OpenAlex
W1992030358
Cited by
315
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
FWCI
46.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annals of the Association of American Geographers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Keywords
internal migration, political segregation, partisanship, racial composition, income, population density, Republican voters, Democratic voters, electoral geography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review