Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate
Abstract
Questions have been raised in recent years about the extent to which the nation is segregated by the political preferences of its electorate. Some have argued that internal migration selects either directly or indirectly on political criteria and thereby produces increasingly one-sided Republican and Democratic neighborhoods. We are among the first to empirically examine voter migration on a large scale. Relying on data for millions of partisan migrants across seven states, we show that partisans relocate based on destination characteristics such as racial composition, income, and population density but additionally prefer to relocate in areas populated with copartisans. This tendency is stronger among Republicans but is also true of Democratic registrants. Whether the role of partisanship is central or ancillary, if it is any part of the decision process it has the potential to make important imprints on the political landscape of the United States.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ideological homogeneity of social networks is enhanced by structural dynamics such as geographic sorting, the growing politicization of the rural-urban divide, and 'lifestyle' differences that are correlated with political orientation.
“The ideological homogeneity of social networks is enhanced by structural dynamics such as geographic sorting209–211, the growing politicization of the rural–urban divide212,213, and ‘lifestyle’ differences that are correlated with political orientation107,214–216”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [209]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 108 · Cited by 315
- Authors
- Tam Cho, W. K., Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Annals of the Association of American Geographers
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-10-15
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 856-870
- ISSN
- 0004-5608 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8306
- OpenAlex
- W1992030358
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 46.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the Association of American Geographers (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
- Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
- Keywords
- internal migration, political segregation, partisanship, racial composition, income, population density, Republican voters, Democratic voters, electoral geography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review