CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46Philosophy, Science, and HistoryAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyPhilosophy and History of Science

Logical positivism (I)

Passmore, J.A.·1943·Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy
DOI 10.1080/00048404308541193
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00048404308541193

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Tractatus inspired members of the Vienna Circle to develop a philosophical movement called logical positivism and logical empiricism.

    “The Tractatus inspired members of the Vienna Circle to develop a philosophical movement that has been called both logical positivism and logical empiricism (cf. Creath, 2014; Passmore, 1943).”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Passmore, 1943

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Passmore, J. A.
Corresponding author
Passmore, J.A.
Venue
Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1943-12
Volume
21
Issue
2-3
Pages
65-92
ISSN
1832-8660 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1080/00048404308541193
OpenAlex
W2073931800
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
logical positivism, verificationism, philosophy of science, empiricism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review