Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 935

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 152 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Belonging: a review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research

Open access
Allen, Kelly-Ann, Kern, Margaret L., Rozek, Christopher S., McInerney, Dennis M., Slavich, George M.·2021·Australian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Objective: A sense of belonging – the subjective feeling of deep connection with social groups, physical places, and individual and collective experiences – is a fundamental human need that predicts numerous mental, physical, social, economic, and behavioural outcomes. However, varying perspectives on how belonging should be conceptualised, assessed, and cultivated has hampered much-needed progress on this timely and important topic. To address these critical issues, we conducted a narrative review that summarizes existing perspectives on belonging, describes a new integrative framework for understanding and studying belonging, and identifies several key avenues for future research and practice.Method: We searched relevant databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and ClinicalTrials.gov, for articles describing belonging, instruments for assessing belonging, and interventions for increasing belonging.Results: By identifying the core components of belonging, we introduce a new integrative framework for understanding, assessing, and cultivating belonging that focuses on four interrelated components: competencies, opportunities, motivations, and perceptions.Conclusion: This integrative framework enhances our understanding of the basic nature and features of belonging, provides a foundation for future interdisciplinary research on belonging and belongingness, and highlights how a robust sense of belonging may be cultivated to improve human health and resilience for individuals and communities worldwide.KEY POINTSWhat is already known about this topic: Belonging is a fundamental human need that all people are driven to satisfy.However, there is disagreement in the literature regarding how a person should go about increasing their sense of belonging. There is also little consensus regarding how belonging should be conceptualized and measured.What this topic adds: The review article draws together disparate perspectives on belonging and harnesses the strengths of this multitude of perspectives to help advance the field.The paper provides a framework that can help inform researchers, practitioners, and individuals seeking to increase a sense of belonging in themselves and in the organizations and groups in which they work and live.We posit that competencies, opportunities, motivations, and perceptions are central elements in strategies that can be used to increase our individual and collective sense of belonging for the betterment of society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409

Cites

152 of 152 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 152 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1007/s12187-020-09721-z · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/1467-7660.00049 · doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00049
  4. Corbould C. (2020 June). The fury in US cities is rooted in a long history of racist policing violence and inequality. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/the-fury-in-us-cities-is-rooted-in-a-long-history-of-racist-policing-violence-and-inequality-139752 · doi:10.64628/aa.tya9mh9g6
  5. 10.1007/s10648-005-1637-2 · doi:10.1007/s10648-005-1637-2
  6. 10.1080/13504630.2017.1381834 · doi:10.1080/13504630.2017.1381834
  7. 10.1017/jie.2014.17 · doi:10.1017/jie.2014.17
  8. Hunter, E. (1998). Adolescent attraction to cults. Adolescence, 33(131), 709–714.
  9. 10.18260/p.25491 · doi:10.18260/p.25491
  10. 10.1353/bsp.2015.0019 · doi:10.1353/bsp.2015.0019 · Paper page
  11. Mahar, A. L., Cobigo, V., & Stuart, H. (2014). Comments on measuring belonging as a service outcome. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 20(2), 20–33.
  12. Martin, A. (2007). The motivation and engagement scale (M.E.S.). Lifelong Achievement Group.
  13. 10.1080/07256868.1989.9963353 · doi:10.1080/07256868.1989.9963353
  14. O’Leary C. (2020). An examination of Indigenous Australians who are flourishing [Master’s thesis]. The University of Melbourne.
  15. Ramsden P. (2020 June). How the pandemic changed social media and George Floyd’s death created a collective conscience. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/how-the-pandemic-changed-social-media-and-george-floyds-death-created-a-collective-conscience-140104 · doi:10.64628/ab.mssgnf7pw
  16. Riley, K. (2017). Place, belonging and school leadership: Researching to make the difference. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  17. Rouchy, J. C. (2002). Cultural identity and groups of belonging. Group, 26(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021009126881 · doi:10.1023/a:1021009126881
  18. Williamson B. Weir J. & Cavanagh V. (2020 January). Strength from perpetual grief: How Aboriginal people experience the bushfire crisis. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/strength-from-perpetual-grief-how-aboriginal-people-experience-the-bushfire-crisis-129448 · doi:10.64628/aa.43n6rdj3f
  19. Yulianto V. I. (2020 June). We’ve been facing a pandemic of racism. How can we stop it? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/weve-been-facing-a-pandemic-of-racism-how-can-we-stop-it–140284 · doi:10.64628/aan.vf5sutd74

Cited by

See all 935

Metadata

Authors
Allen, K.-A., Kern, M. L., Rozek, C. S., McInerney, D. M., & Slavich, G. M.
Venue
Australian Journal of Psychology
Published
2021-01-02
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
87-102
ISSN
  • 0004-9530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9536
OpenAlex
W3136729105
Cited by
935
References
152
FWCI
127.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Funders
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (Society in Science—Branco Weiss Fellowship, NARS)
  • NIH Clinical Center (K08 MH103443.)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Belonging: a review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409
The paper
Allen, K.-A., Kern, M. L., Rozek, C. S., McInerney, D. M., & Slavich, G. M. (2021). Belonging: a review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Australian Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.