Cited by 44Ethics in Clinical ResearchChildren's Rights and ParticipationEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare

Responses to ethical challenges in conducting research with Australian adolescents

Open access
Kelly, Adrian B., Halford, W. Kim·2007·Australian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Current research ethical guidelines are unclear about the extent to which adolescents can be considered competent to provide informed consent to participate in psychological research. Researchers and human research ethics committees (HRECs) need clearer guidance on when various types of parental consent are required. Some important psychological research on critical public health issues affecting young people is delayed, its methodology compromised, or even does not proceed, because the vagueness in current guidelines lead HRECs to take unduly conservative decisions about the level of risk from research participation, and the competency of mature minors to consent. This paper includes recommendations for researchers and the Australian Psychological Society that could enhance the ethical conduct of research with adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00049530600944358

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Arias, I., Lynberg, M., Simon, T., Kresnow, M., & Shelley, G. (2004). Respondents' reactions to sensitive questions regarding intimate partner violence and sexual violence. Paper presented at the 38th Annual AABT Convention, 18 -21 November. LA: New Orleans. Australian Psychological Society. (2002). Code of ethics (4th ed.). Melbourne: Australian Psychological Society.
  2. Jason, L. A., Pokorny, S., & Katz, R. (2001). Passive versus active consent: A case study in school settings. Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 53 -68.
  3. Loxley, W., & Hawks, D. (1995). Legal protection for illicit drug use research. Ethical and legal issues when conducting research into illegal behaviours: Proceedings of a forum (pp. 15 -20). Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
  4. Moolchan, E. T., & Mermelstein, R. (2002). Research on tobacco use among teenagers: Ethical challenges. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30, 409 -417.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, A. B., & Halford, W. K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Venue
Australian Journal of Psychology
Published
2007-05-01
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
24-33
ISSN
  • 0004-9530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9536
OpenAlex
W2022212400
Cited by
44
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Australian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (189414)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
research ethics, adolescents, informed consent, mature minors, parental consent, research ethics committees, research risk assessment, capacity to consent, Australian Psychological Society, moral norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review