Cited by 134Animal Ecology and Behavior StudiesAvian ecology and behaviorWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Long-term effects of North American Mink Mustela vison on seabirds in western Scotland

Open access
Craik, C.·1997·Bird Study

Abstract

In the years 1989-95, feral North American Mink caused widespread whole-colony breeding failures of Black-headed Gulls, Common Gulls and Common Terns at colonies on small islands in a study area along 1000 km of mainland coast in west Scotland. After one or more years of such failure, most of the affected breeding sites held no birds or greatly reduced numbers. In some cases movement to new or existing colonies was detected; birds sometimes found mink-free islands and bred successfully. By 1996, mink had had two distinct long-term effects on breeding numbers and distribution of these species. (1) In 1987 the study area contained 1839 breeding pairs of Common Terns (one-eighth of the British Isles total). By 1996 they had decreased by 36% to 1179 pairs. Between 1989 and 1996, Black-headed Gulls and Common Gulls decreased by 52% and 30%. There was no evidence that birds had left the area and, subject to certain assumptions, these decreases were largely accounted for by known predation of eggs and chicks by mink. (2) Discrete areas such as archipelagoes, sea lochs, firths and sounds lost all or nearly all breeding seabirds as a result of such movements from affected islands. Mink predation is widespread but difficult to detect and should be considered as a possible cause when seabird colonies near the mainland decline and disappear.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00063659709461065

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seabird predation by invasive American mink has received extensive attention in Europe, but this has not been the subject of a comprehensive review in North America.

    “Seabird predation by invasive American mink has received extensive attention in Europe (Craik 1997; Banks et al. 2008), but this has not been the subject of a comprehensive review in North America.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cramp, S. (1983) The Birds of the Western Palearctic Vol.3, pp. 751 and 792. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craik, C.
Affiliations
Scottish Association For Marine Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Craik, C.
Venue
Bird Study
Published
1997-11
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
303-309
ISSN
  • 0006-3657 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-6705
OpenAlex
W1987047622
Cited by
134
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Bird Study (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
American mink, common tern, black-headed gull, common gull, feral predators, small islands, western Scotland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review