The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Immunomodulation by probiotic lactobacilli in layer- and meat-type chickens
Open accessAbstract
1. The aim of the experiments was to evaluate whether selected probiotic lactobacillus strains have different immunomodulating effects in layer- and meat-type strain chickens. 2. Humoral and cellular specific and non-specific immune responses were studied by experiments on cellular proliferation, entry and survival of Salmonella bacteria in gut and spleen leukocytes, immunoglobulin isotypes and specific immunoglobulin titres. 3. The effects of two different feeding regimes (short and continuous feeding) and doses for administration of lactobacilli were studied. 4. The lactobacillus strains that were evaluated showed modulating effects on the immune system of layer- and meat-type chickens. 5. In meat-type strain chickens the lactobacilli had a stimulating effect when the chickens were young (up to 3 weeks) and the dose was relatively high, whereas in layer-type chickens a lower effective dose and discontinuous administration was also effective. 6. Immunoprobiotic lactobacilli can have a positive effect on humoral and cellular immune responses in layer- and meat-type strain chickens, but the lactobacillus strain to be used, the age of the animals and effective dose of lactobacilli to be administered need to be optimised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional food science and gastrointestinal physiology and function
Salminen, S., Bouley, C., Boutron, M.-C., Cummings, J. H., Franck, A., Gibson, G. R., Isolauri, E., Moreau, M.-C., Roberfroid, M., & Rowland, I. (1998) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19980108 · Cited by 1,398
Dunne, C., O’Mahony, L., Murphy, L., Thornton, G., Morrissey, D., O’Halloran, S., Feeney, M., Flynn, S., Fitzgerald, G., Daly, C., et al. (2001) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/73.2.386s · Cited by 922
Cited by
Mountzouris, K. C., Tsirtsikos, P., Kalamara, E., Nitsch, S., Schatzmayr, G., & Fegeros, K. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.2.309 · Cited by 632
Mountzouris, K. C., Tsitrsikos, P., Palamidi, I., Arvaniti, A., Mohnl, M., Schatzmayr, G., & Fegeros, K. (2010) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.2009-00308 · Cited by 490
Bai, K., Huang, Q., Zhang, J., He, J., Zhang, L., & Wang, T. (2017) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps/pew246 · Cited by 339
Mookiah, S., Sieo, C. C., Ramasamy, K., Abdullah, N., & Ho, Y. W. (2014) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6365 · Cited by 273
Awais, M. M., Jamal, M. A., Akhtar, M., Hameed, M. R., Anwar, M. I., & Ullah, M. I. (2019) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2018.10.038 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Koenen, M. E., Kramer, J., van der Hulst, R., Heres, L., Jeurissen, S. H. M., & Boersma, W. J. A.
- Venue
- British Poultry Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 355-366
- ISSN
- 0007-1668 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-1799
- OpenAlex
- W2160437798
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunomodulation by probiotic lactobacilli in layer- and meat-type chickens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00071660410001730851
- The paper
- Koenen, M. E., Kramer, J., van der Hulst, R., Heres, L., Jeurissen, S. H. M., & Boersma, W. J. A. (2004). Immunomodulation by probiotic lactobacilli in layer- and meat-type chickens. British Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660410001730851
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
