The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transforming Science Education at Large Research Universities: A Case Study in Progressxs
Abstract
There are countless reports stressing the economic and societal benefits to be gained from improved science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education for all students. But although there ...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite a strong consensus among scientists and educators on the need for change, the pace of broad educational reform has been frustratingly slow (Wieman et al., 2010).”
From Competency-Based Reforms of the Undergraduate Biology Curriculum: Integrating the Physical and Biological Sciences (2013) · cites this paper as Wieman et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Teaching physics : with the physics suite
Redish, E. F. (2003) · Cited by 295
Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite
Redish, E. F., & Burciaga, J. R. (2004) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1691552 · Cited by 273
Why Not Try a Scientific Approach to Science Education?
Wieman, C. (2007) · Change The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.3200/chng.39.5.9-15 · Cited by 220
Self-citationA thoughtful approach to instruction: Course transformation for the rest of us
Chasteen, S. V., Perkins, K. K., Beale, P. D., Pollock, S. J., & Wieman, C. (2011) · The journal of college science teaching · Cited by 59
Self-citationPerkins, K. K., & Smith, M. C. (2010) · Microbiology Australia · doi:10.1071/ma10035 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Chasteen S. V, 2010, College Science Teaching
- Smith Perkins, 2010, Microbiology Australia
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Singer, S. R., & Smith, K. A. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20030 · Cited by 852
Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H. M., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. (2013) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154 · Cited by 588
Self-citationWieman, C., & Gilbert, S. L. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-02-0023 · Cited by 181
Self-citationInnovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review
Santos, J., Figueiredo, A. S., & Vieira, M. M. D. S. (2018) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003 · Cited by 131
Dancy, M., Henderson, C., & Turpen, C. (2016) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.010110 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Wieman, C., Perkins, K., & Gilbert, S.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-02-26
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 6-14
- ISSN
- 0009-1383 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9146
- OpenAlex
- W1975486664
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 34.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Change The Magazine of Higher Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Keywords
- science education reform, large research universities, STEM education, undergraduate science curriculum, higher education transformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
