Rating Faculty Collegiality
Abstract
Most position descriptions for college and university faculty include benchmarks that indicate assumptions about collegiality. For instance, many include within the teaching or service components o...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Citizenship fatigue may occur when employees demonstrate high levels of OCB in an organization with low support for OCB.
“Interestingly, the concept of citizenship fatigue has been studied as a phenomenon that may occur when employees demonstrate high levels of OCB in an organization with low support for OCB.24”
From Revisiting Faculty Citizenship (2019) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 2 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Cipriano, R. E., & Buller, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Southern Connecticut State University (US)
- Florida Atlantic University (US)
- Venue
- Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-02-29
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 45-48
- ISSN
- 0009-1383 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9146
- OpenAlex
- W2061423172
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Change The Magazine of Higher Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Performance Evaluation
- Keywords
- faculty evaluation, job descriptions, faculty development, university administration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
