The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rate of Spread of Free-Burning Fires in Woody Fuels in a Wind Tunnel
Abstract
We describe the results of 357 experimental fires conducted in an environmentally controlled large wind tunnel. The fires were burned over a range of particle sizes, fuel bed depths, packing ratios, moisture contents and windspeeds. We find that spread rate decreases with moisture content in a way which depends on the fuel type and diameter. It decreases as the square root of the packing ratio. Fuel bed depth has little effect on spread rate, and fuel diameter has significant effect only for diameters above 1 mm. The relationship between rale or spread and windspeed is virtually linear We develop a predictive model for rate of-spread based on energy transfer considerations and the laboratory results. Other laboratory-based models for spread rate are compared with our model, and tested against the laboratory data. The other models have forms similar to ours, but do not predict our data well. Our model predicts well the spread rates for fires burned in windspeeds below 3 m/sec in other laboratories. The scale of the experiments and the similarity of the dependence on windspeed to that found in the field indicate that a field model may be developed from the laboratory model with relatively few modifications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels
Rothermel, R. C. (1972) · doi:10.2737/int-rp-115 · Cited by 2,247
Self-citation
Cited by
Assessing crown fire potential by linking models of surface and crown fire behavior
Scott, J. H., & Reinhardt, E. D. (2001) · doi:10.2737/rmrs-rp-29 · Cited by 614
Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 2: Empirical and quasi-empirical models
Sullivan, A. L. (2009) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf06142 · Cited by 408
Mathematical models and calculation systems for the study of wildland fire behaviour
Pastor, E. (2003) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/s0360-1285(03)00017-0 · Cited by 362
Modeling the propagation of a wildfire through a Mediterranean shrub using a multiphase formulation
Morvan, D., & Dupuy, J. L. (2004) · Combustion and Flame · doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.05.001 · Cited by 267
Hyde, K., Dickinson, M. B., Bohrer, G., Calkin, D., Evers, L., Gilbertson-Day, J., Nicolet, T., Ryan, K., & Tague, C. (2013) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf11143 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- CATCHPOLE, W. R., CATCHPOLE, E. A., BUTLER, B. W., ROTHERMEL, R. C., MORRIS, G. A., & LATHAM, D. J.
- Venue
- Combustion Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 1-6
- Pages
- 1-37
- ISSN
- 0010-2202 (ISSN-L)
- 1563-521X
- OpenAlex
- W2049312508
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rate of Spread of Free-Burning Fires in Woody Fuels in a Wind Tunnel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00102209808935753
- The paper
- CATCHPOLE, W. R., CATCHPOLE, E. A., BUTLER, B. W., ROTHERMEL, R. C., MORRIS, G. A., & LATHAM, D. J. (1998). Rate of Spread of Free-Burning Fires in Woody Fuels in a Wind Tunnel. Combustion Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102209808935753
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.