The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Soil analysis procedures using 0.01 M calcium chloride as extraction reagent
Open accessAbstract
This publication gives details of laboratory procedures for the determinations of bioavailable (e.g., plants) quantities of nutritional and polluting inorganic elements in 0.01 M CaCl2 extracts of air‐dry soil samples. Air‐day soil samples are extracted for two hours with a 0.01 M CaCl2 solution of 20°C in a 1:10 extraction ratio (W/V). After measuring the pH in the settling suspension, the concentrations of nutritional and polluting elements are measured in the clear centrifugate or filtrate. The procedure is simple, easy to perform, and cheap (labor, chemicals) in daily use in routine soil laboratories. The method receives internationally more and more attention as an alternative for the many extraction procedures for a single nutrient or pollutant that are still in use nowadays. The soil is extracted with a solution what has more or less the same ionic strength as the average salt concentration in many soil solutions. Various nutrients and metals can be measured in a single extract that allows considering relationships between them during interpretation of the data. For most elements, different detection techniques are described in detail in this publication. Detailed laboratory procedures are described for the determination of pH, total dissolved organic carbon, nitrate, ammonium, total dissolved nitrogen, sulphate, total dissolved sulfur, ortho‐phosphate, total dissolved phosphate, sodium, potassium, magnesium, cadmium, copper, nickel, lead, aluminum, iron, arsenic, boron, and phenols. Since only one extract of soil samples is used, profitable use can be made of multi‐element detection techniques like segmented‐flow analysis spectrometry, ICP‐OES, and ICP‐MS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., Zablotskaja, M., & Vijver, M. G. (2007) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.02.008 · Cited by 326
Mia, S., van Groenigen, J. W., van de Voorde, T. F. J., Oram, N. J., Bezemer, T. M., Mommer, L., & Jeffery, S. (2014) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.011 · Cited by 208
Application of eggshell waste for the immobilization of cadmium and lead in a contaminated soil
Ok, Y. S., Lee, S. S., Jeon, W.-T., Oh, S.-E., Usman, A. R. A., & Moon, D. H. (2011) · Environmental Geochemistry and Health · doi:10.1007/s10653-010-9362-2 · Cited by 146
Fedotov, P. S., Kördel, W., Miró, M., Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., Wennrich, R., & Huang, P.-M. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2011.556544 · Cited by 78
Salam, A., Shaheen, S. M., Bashir, S., Khan, I., Wang, J., Rinklebe, J., Rehman, F. U., & Hu, H. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.047 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Houba, V. J. G., Temminghoff, E. J. M., Gaikhorst, G. A., & van Vark, W.
- Venue
- Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 1299-1396
- ISSN
- 0010-3624 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2416
- OpenAlex
- W2159205497
- Cited by
- 897
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil analysis procedures using 0.01 M calcium chloride as extraction reagent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00103620009370514
- The paper
- Houba, V. J. G., Temminghoff, E. J. M., Gaikhorst, G. A., & van Vark, W. (2000). Soil analysis procedures using 0.01 M calcium chloride as extraction reagent. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620009370514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.