Cited by 41Agricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsRice Cultivation and Yield Improvement

Biochar and Sewage Sludge Application Increases Yield and Micronutrient Uptake in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Jatav, Hanuman Singh, Singh, Satish Kumar, Singh, Yadvir, Kumar, Omkar·2018·Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Abstract

A greenhouse experiment was conducted in the Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (U.P.), India, during kharif 2013 to find out the effect of biochar and sewage sludge (SS) on growth, yield, and micronutrient uptake in rice crop. Nine treatments were employed using six different doses of biochar (2.5, 5.0, 7.5 10, 15, and 20 t ha−1) amended with a fixed dose of SS (30 t ha−1) and 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (50% RDN), i.e., 60 kg ha−1. Other three treatments were absolute control (no fertilizers), 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (100% RDF) which was 120:60:60 kg ha−1 as nitrogen (N): phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5):dipotassium oxide (K2O), and 30 t ha−1SS + 50% RDN. Experimental results showed a significant increase in yield of rice crop with increasing levels of biochar along with SS. Application of biochar at 20 t ha−1 along with 30 t ha−1SS increased grain yield to the extent of 2.5 times over absolute control (no fertilizers) and 8.5% over control (100% RDF). The uptake of iron (Fe), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and manganese (Mn) (micronutrients) increased significantly with graded doses of biochar application from 2.5 to 20 t ha−1 in the soil. The maximum micronutrient uptake and grain yield of rice were found in T9 where 30 t ha−1SS along with 20 t ha−1 biochar was applied with only 50% RDN. The maximum availability of micronutrients in soil was found with 30 t ha−1 of SS + 50% RDN (T3) followed by conjoint application of 20 t ha−1 of biochar and 30 t ha−1 SS + 50% RDN (T9).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00103624.2018.1474900

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rice husk biochar had no impact on increasing the electrical conductivity in the soil.

    “However, rice husk biochar (EC = 2.56 dS m -1 ) had no impact on increasing the EC in the soil (Jatav et al. 2018).”

    From Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant (2020) · cites this paper as Jatav et al. 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jatav, H. S., Singh, S. K., Singh, Y., & Kumar, O.
Affiliations
Banaras Hindu University (IN)
Corresponding author
Singh, Satish Kumar
Venue
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
Published
2018-05-21
Volume
49
Issue
13
Pages
1617-1628
ISSN
  • 0010-3624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2416
OpenAlex
W2803758258
Cited by
41
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, India
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Keywords
biochar, sewage sludge, rice, grain yield, micronutrient uptake, iron, copper, zinc, manganese, soil amendment, micronutrient availability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review