The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new soil test for simultaneous extraction of macro‐ and micro‐nutrients in alkaline soils
Abstract
A new soil test was developed for simultaneous extraction of NO3, P, K, Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn from alkaline soils. The new extraction solution is 1 M in ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3), 0.005 M in Diethylene Triamine Pentaacetic Acid (DTPA) and has a pH of 7.6. The new extracting solution should be stored under mineral oil. Ten grams of soil are weighed out into 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks. Two 2.5 ml scoops of Fisher G carbon black (to remove color for colorimetric determination of nitrates) are added to each soil, followed by 20 ml extracting solution. The soil mixture is then shaken on an Eberbach reciprocal shaker for 15 minutes at 180 cycles per minute. The extract is then filtered through a Whatman 42 filter paper or its equivalent for NO3, P, K, Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn determinations. The results obtained with the new procedure are highly correlated with results obtained with Olsen's P test, ammonium acetate K test, and Lindsay and Norvell's DTPA‐Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn test. Regression equations between the levels of nutrients extracted by the new procedure and those extracted by the procedures mentioned above were developed. These equations were used to calculate index values for nutrients extracted by the new extraction procedure based on values used at the Colorado State University Soil Testing Laboratory for the standard extraction procedures. The new procedure extracted about the same amounts of K and Fe as ammonium acetate and DTPA, respectively, from soils having low to marginal levels of these elements. However, it extracted about half as much P as NaHCO3 and about 0.5 PPM more Zn, 0.8 PPM more Mn, and 0.3 PPM more Cu from soils having low to marginal levels of these elements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Test of an Ascorbic Acid Method for Determining Phosphorus in Water and NaHCO 3 Extracts from Soil
Watanabe, F. S., & Olsen, S. R. (1965) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1965.03615995002900060025x · Cited by 2,485
Cited by
Lithium, Sodium, Potassium, Rubidium, and Cesium
Helmke, P. A., & Sparks, D. L. (1996) · SSSA Book Series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c19 · Cited by 599
Use of ammonium bicarbonate DTPA soil test to evaluate elemental availability and toxicity
Soltanpour, P. N. (1985) · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis · doi:10.1080/00103628509367607 · Cited by 451
Self-citationEvaluating the ecological performance of wetland restoration in the Yellow River Delta, China
Cui, B., Yang, Q., Yang, Z., & Zhang, K. (2009) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.022 · Cited by 434
A Single Extraction Procedure of Soil for Evaluation of Uptake of Some Heavy Metals by Plants
Novozamsky, I., Lexmond, T. M., & Houba, V. J. G. (1993) · International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1080/03067319308027610 · Cited by 391
Fixen, P. E., & Grove, J. H. (1990) · SSSA Book Series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser3.3ed.c7 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Soltanpour, P. N., & Schwab, A. P.
- Venue
- Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1977-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 195-207
- ISSN
- 0010-3624 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2416
- OpenAlex
- W1990655685
- Cited by
- 897
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new soil test for simultaneous extraction of macro‐ and micro‐nutrients in alkaline soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00103627709366714
- The paper
- Soltanpour, P. N., & Schwab, A. P. (1977). A new soil test for simultaneous extraction of macro‐ and micro‐nutrients in alkaline soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627709366714
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.