Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work

Engestrom, Yrjo·2000·Ergonomics

Abstract

Cultural-historical activity theory is a new framework aimed at transcending the dichotomies of micro- and macro-, mental and material, observation and intervention in analysis and redesign of work. The approach distinguishes between short-lived goal-directed actions and durable, object-oriented activity systems. A historically evolving collective activity system, seen in its network relations to other activity systems, is taken as the prime unit of analysis against which scripted strings of goal-directed actions and automatic operations are interpreted. Activity systems are driven by communal motives that are often difficult to articulate for individual participants. Activity systems are in constant movement and internally contradictory. Their systemic contradictions, manifested in disturbances and mundane innovations, offer possibilities for expansive developmental transformations. Such transformations proceed through stepwise cycles of expansive learning which begin with actions of questioning the existing standard practice, then proceed to actions of analyzing its contradictions and modelling a vision for its zone of proximal development, then to actions of examining and implementing the new model in practice. New forms of work organization increasingly require negotiated 'knotworking' across boundaries. Correspondingly, expansive learning increasingly involves horizontal widening of collective expertise by means of debating, negotiating and hybridizing different perspectives and conceptualizations. Findings from a longitudinal intervention study of children's medical care illuminate the theoretical arguments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/001401300409143

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. CHAIKLIN, S., HEDEGAARD, M., and JENSEN, U. J., 1999. Activity Theory and Social Practice. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press; 1999.
  2. ENGESTRÖM, Y., 1996a. Development as breaking away and opening up: a challenge to Vygotsky and Piaget, Swiss Journal of Psychology 55 (1996a), pp. 126–132.
  3. ENGESTRÖM, Y., 1996. "The tensions of judging: handling cases of driving under the influence of alcohol in Finland and in California". In: Engeström, Y., and Middleton, D., eds. Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. pp. 199–232. · DOI
  4. ENGESTRÖM, Y., 1998. "Innovative learning in work teams: analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice". In: Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., and Punamäki, R.-L., eds. Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. pp. 377–404.
  5. ENGESTRÖM, Y., 2000. "Making expansive decisions: an activity—theoretical study of practitioners building collaborative medical care for children". In: Allwood, K. M., and Selart, M., eds. Decision Making: Social and Creative Dimensions. Amsterdam: Kluwer; 2000, in press.
  6. 10.1017/CBO9780511812774 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1017/CBO9781139174077 · DOI · Paper page
  8. ENGESTRÖM, Y., MIETTINEN, R., and PUNAMÄKI, R.-L., 1998. Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
  9. LEONT'EV, A. N., 1978. Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1978.
  10. NARDI, B. A., 1996. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human—Computer Interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1996.
  11. 10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. NORROS, L., 1996. "System disturbances as springboard for development of operators' expertise". In: Engeström, Y., and Middleton, D., eds. Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. pp. 159–176. · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s12130-999-1026-0 · DOI · Paper page
  14. SENNETT, R., 2000. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: Norton; 2000.
  15. VICTOR, B., and BOYNTON, A. C., 1998. Invented Here: Maximising Your Organisation's Internal Growth and Profitability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1998.
  16. VYGOTSKY, L. S., 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1978.
  17. VYGOTSKY, L. S., 1987. Thinking and Speech. New York: Plenum; 1987.

Cited by

See all 1,388

Metadata

Authors
Engestrom, Y.
Venue
Ergonomics
Published
2000-07
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
960-974
ISSN
  • 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5847
OpenAlex
W1963747651
Cited by
1,388
References
3
FWCI
15.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/001401300409143
The paper
Engestrom, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300409143

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.