The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of acoustic environment on work in private office rooms and open-plan offices – longitudinal study during relocation
Abstract
The aim was to determine how the perceived work environment, especially acoustic environment, and its effects differed in private office rooms and in open-plan offices. The subjects consisted of 31 workers who moved from private office rooms to open-plan offices and who answered the questionnaire before and after the relocation. Private office rooms were occupied only by one person while open-plan offices were occupied by more than 20 persons. Room acoustical descriptors showed a significant reduction in speech privacy after relocation. The noise level averaged over the whole work day did not change but the variability of noise level reduced significantly. Negative effects of acoustic environment increased significantly, including increased distraction, reduced privacy, increased concentration difficulties and increased use of coping strategies. Self-rated loss of work performance because of noise doubled. Cognitively demanding work and phone conversations were most distracted by noise. The benefits that are often associated with open-plan offices did not appear: cooperation became less pleasant and direct and information flow did not change. Nowadays, most office workers, independent of job type, are located in open-plan offices without the individual needs of privacy, concentration and interaction being analysed. This intervention study consisted of professional workers. Their work tasks mainly required individual efforts, and interaction between other workers was not of primary concern, although necessary. The results suggest that the open-plan office is not recommended for professional workers. Similar intervention studies should also be made for other job types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
STAI manual for the State-trait anxiety inventory
Cd, S. (1970) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,433
Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. (1982) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(82)90521-7 · Cited by 902
Houtgast, T., & Steeneken, H. J. M. (1985) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.392224 · Cited by 671
Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association: (465412008-001)
(1970) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e465412008-001 · Cited by 518
Acoustic masking in primary memory
Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(76)90003-7 · Cited by 501
De Croon, E., Sluiter, J., Kuijer, P. P., & Frings-Dresen, M. (2005) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130512331319409 · Cited by 450
(1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 406
Traditional versus Open Office Design: A Longitudinal Field Study
Brennan, A., Chugh, J. S., & Kline, T. (2002) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916502034003001 · Cited by 402
Evans, G. W., & Johnson, D. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.5.779 · Cited by 391
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Boyce P. R., 1974, Journal of Architectural Research, 3, 44
- Danielsson C., 2005, Office environment, health and job satisfaction
- 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.779 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.779 · Paper page
- Eysenck H. J., 1972, Eysenck Personality Inventory, Form A
- Griefahn B., 2008, Acoustics
- Haapakangas A., 9th international congress on noise as a public health problem (ICBEN) 2008, 434
- Haka M., 2009, Indoor Air
- Helenius R., Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2004, paper 674
- Hongisto V., 9th international congress on noise as a public health problem (ICBEN) 2008, 442
- Hongisto V., 2004, Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 90, 481
- Hundert A. T., Proceedings of the 77th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, 601
- International Organization for Standardization, 1995, Acoustics [Dbar]-measurement of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements, part 4: Field measurements of airborne sound insulation of between rooms
- International Organization for Standardization, 1996, Acoustics [Dbar] rating of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements, part 1: airborne sound insulation
- International Organization for Standardization, 1997, Acoustics – Sound absorbers for use in buildings – Rating of sound absorption
- International Organization for Standardization, 2009, Acoustics – Measurement of room acoustic parameters – Part 3: Open plan spaces
- Ives R. S., 1974, Personnel Practice Bulletin, 30, 126
- Jones D., 9th international congress on noise as a public health problem (ICBEN)
- Kaarlela A., 2003, Acoustical environment questionnaire for offices – method development
- Kankkunen E., 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Keighley E. C., 1970, Journal of Sound Vibration, 11, 83, 10.1016/S0022-460X(70)80108-0 · doi:10.1016/s0022-460x(70)80108-0
- Keränen J., International congress on acoustics, paper RBA-10–006-IP
- 10.1037/0278-7393.13.2.310 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.2.310 · Paper page
Cited by
Wohlers, C., & Hertel, G. (2017) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1188220 · Cited by 223
Perceptions of performance and satisfaction after relocation to an activity-based office
Rolfö, L., Eklund, J., & Jahncke, H. (2018) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2017.1398844 · Cited by 121
“The reasons included reduced auditory privacy (de Croon et al. 2005; Jahncke and Halin 2012; Jahncke, Hongisto, and Virjonen 2013; Kaarlela-Tuomaala et al. 2009; Kim and de Dear 2013; Sundstrom, Burt, and Kamp 1980; Sundstrom et al. 1994), and reduced confidentiality during communication (Brennan,…”
BackgroundJahncke, H., Hongisto, V., & Virjonen, P. (2013) · Applied Acoustics · doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.08.007 · Cited by 95
Self-citationA Workplace to Support Creativity
Samani, S. A., Rasid, S. Z. B. A., & bt Sofian, S. (2014) · Industrial Engineering and Management Systems · doi:10.7232/iems.2014.13.4.414 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaarlela-Tuomaala, A., Helenius, R., Keskinen, E., & Hongisto, V.
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-10-21
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1423-1444
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2007964183
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of acoustic environment on work in private office rooms and open-plan offices – longitudinal study during relocation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00140130903154579
- The paper
- Kaarlela-Tuomaala, A., Helenius, R., Keskinen, E., & Hongisto, V. (2009). Effects of acoustic environment on work in private office rooms and open-plan offices – longitudinal study during relocation. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903154579
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.