Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metabolic measures to ascertain the optimal load to be carried by man

PIERRYNOWSKI, M. R., WINTER, D. A., NORMAN, R. W.·1981·Ergonomics

Abstract

As part of a combined electromyographic, mechanical work and metabolic study of load carriage this research focuses on the optimal load carried by the subject. This study demonstrates the anomalies associated with the definition of optimal load, and shows that it is dependent on whether or not the carrier is given any credit for carrying his own weight as well as that of the load. In many situations it may be important to include the carrier's own body mass in the optimal load equation. This study showed that if the load were body plus backpack the optimal backpack load was found to be quite low (less than 10kg) because the metabolic cosi increased quite rapidly at low loads. On the other hand, if the carrier's mass was ignored there might be an optimum load at 40 kg or higher. Giving partial ‘credit’ for carrying body weight (for example, 50% body mass plus backpack), resulted in an optimum load of about 17 kg. The percentage ‘credit’ given to the body mass itself depends on how important it is that the carrier does not arrive fatigued at his destination. The military may wish to give 100% credit, and recreational carriers zero.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00140138108924861

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is unresolved whether the per kilogram metabolic costs of body mass vs. external mass affixed to the torso are equal.

    “Similarly unresolved is whether the per kilogram metabolic costs of body mass vs. external mass affixed to the torso are equal (6,26,30,37,45,51,58,67).”
  • The possibility of load-related deviation being responsible for marginally greater relative increases for the heavier vs. lighter load condition as suggested by several investigators to occur for loads >0.3 body weights cannot be completely ruled out.

    “The possibility of load-related deviation being responsible for marginally greater relative increases for the heavier vs. lighter load condition as suggested by several investigators (25,26,38,51,58) to occur for loads Ͼ0.3 body weights cannot be completely ruled out.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. BHDALE E. M., 1924, Comparison of the energy expenditure of a woman carrying loads in eight different positions
  2. BKHZINA E., 1912, Bhchemixclw Zcitschrift, 38, 129
  3. BRHZINA E., 1914, Biochemische Zeitschrift, 63, 170
  4. CARRE L.T., 1908, Infantry Journal, 5, 757
  5. CATMCART E. P., 1923, Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps, 40, 435
  6. DANIELS F., 1953, Quartermaster Research and Development Laboratory
  7. CHATTERJEE B. B., 1975, Journal of Applied Physiology, 38, 132, 10.1152/jappl.1975.38.1.132 · DOI
  8. DATTA S.R., 1970, Indian Journal of Medical Research, 58, 1629
  9. GAESSKR G. A., 1975, Journal of Applied Physiology, 38, 1132, 10.1152/jappl.1975.38.6.1132 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/00140136508930809 · DOI
  11. GOLDMAN R. F., 1962, Journal of Applied Physiology, 17, 675, 10.1152/jappl.1962.17.4.675 · DOI · Paper page
  12. HUGHES A. L., 1970, Journal of Applied Physiology, 29, 570, 10.1152/jappl.1970.29.5.570 · DOI · Paper page
  13. LIPPOLD O. C. J., 1950, Army Operational Research Group
  14. MCDONALD I., 1961, Nutrition Abstracts anil Reviews, 31, 739
  15. MALHOTRA M.S., 1962, Journal of Applied Physiology, 7, 433, 10.1152/jappl.1962.17.3.433 · DOI
  16. MÜLLER A. A., 1952, Arbeitsphysiologie, 14, 449
  17. NAYER H. S., 1963, Office of the Director General, Armed Forces Medical Services
  18. NORMAN R. W, 1979, In Proceedings of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiologists, 148
  19. ORR G., 1980, Internal research report, Department of Kinesiology
  20. CRAMPTON R. F., 1956, Army Operational Research Group Report Number 4/56
  21. 1954, Journal of the Roval Annv Medical Corps, 99, 1
  22. WOOLLEY S., 1979, In Proceedings of the third Conference of the American Society of Biomechanics
  23. WYNDHAM C. H., 1962, Nature, London, 1210, 10.1038/1951210b0 · DOI
  24. WYNDHAM C. H., 1971, Internationale Zeitschrift für Angewandte, 29, 285
  25. ZUNTZ N., 1901, Studien zu einer Physiologic des Marsches

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
PIERRYNOWSKI, M. R., WINTER, D. A., & NORMAN, R. W.
Venue
Ergonomics
Published
1981-05
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
393-399
ISSN
  • 0014-0139
  • 1366-5847
Cited by
43
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review