The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Energy cost of "hard work"
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The possibility of load-related deviation being responsible for marginally greater relative increases for the heavier vs. lighter load condition as suggested by several investigators to occur for loads >0.3 body weights cannot be completely ruled out.
“The possibility of load-related deviation being responsible for marginally greater relative increases for the heavier vs. lighter load condition as suggested by several investigators (25,26,38,51,58) to occur for loads Ͼ0.3 body weights cannot be completely ruled out.”
From Walking economy is predictably determined by speed, grade, and gravitational load. (2017) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The energy cost of walking or running on sand
Zamparo, P., Perini, R., Orizio, C., Sacher, M., & Ferretti, G. (1992) · European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology · doi:10.1007/bf00705078 · Cited by 214
Metabolic Energy Expenditure and Terrain Coefficients for Walking on Snow
PANDOLF, K. B., HAISMAN, M. F., & GOLDMAN, R. F. (1976) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140137608931583 · Cited by 133
Self-citationEnergy expenditure while standing or walking slowly uphill or downhill with loads
PIMENTAL, N. A., & PANDOLF, K. B. (1979) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140137908924670 · Cited by 72
Walking economy is predictably determined by speed, grade, and gravitational load.
Ludlow, L. W., & Weyand, P. G. (2017) · Journal of applied physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00504.2017 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Hughes, A. L., & Goldman, R. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1970-11-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 570-572
- ISSN
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
