Cited by 159Usability and User Interface DesignInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorInteractive and Immersive Displays

Computer display menus

SNOWBERRY, KATHLEEN, PARKINSON, STANLEY R., SISSON, NORWOOD·1983·Ergonomics

Abstract

Whereas menu selection remains as one of the most popular forms of computer-initiated dialogue, very little is known about the effects of menu structure on selection performance. Menu hierarchies can be arranged with many items on a menu and a minimum number of menus (breadth) or with few options on a menu and several levels (depth). In the present study, subjects searched through one of four verbal hierarchies developed by Miller (1981), each with 64 words at the lowest level. The deepest hierarchy consisted of binary choices at six levels (26) while in the broadest array (641) all target words were presented in a single menu. Intermediate levels of breadth and depth were eight choices at two levels (82) and four choices at three levels (43). Two arrays were used in the 641 condition, one in which categorical relationships between words were maintained by presenting all members of a category in the same area of the display (CAT64), and one in which location of words was randomly determined (RAN64). Trend analyses on menu structures 26, 43,82 and CAT64 indicated that search speed and accuracy improved as a function of menu breadth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00140138308963390

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SNOWBERRY, K., PARKINSON, S. R., & SISSON, N.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Ergonomics
Published
1983-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
699-712
ISSN
  • 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5847
OpenAlex
W2084378200
Cited by
159
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
Keywords
menu selection, menu hierarchy, menu depth, search speed, search accuracy, human-computer interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review