The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information integration and the object display An interaction of task demands and display superiority
Abstract
Two tasks, varying in their demands to integrate multiple information sources, were used in a comparison of two graphical display formats. One display technique, an ‘object display’, utilized different dimensions of a single perceptual object to display task-relevant information. A contrasting graphical technique, a ‘bar graph’, used the same dimension of several separate objects to present identical information. In one experiment, 24 subjects used both displays to perform a simulated process control task in which integration of information from several time-varying sources was required. In a second experiment, 20 additional subjects used both displays in a non-integration task that required monitoring for particular values of six independent system outputs. Results of the integration experiment revealed that performance was superior when the object display was used. However, when the non-integration task was studied, the bar graphs provided more efficient performance. Thus, the requirement to integrate information from several sources may prove to be a predictor of when object displays may be most effectively used.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, the level of cognitive control will also vary as a joint function of the level of skill of the operator and the level of complexity of task demands.”
From Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations (1992) · cites this paper as [94]
In the citing paper
“In the systems reliability and cognitive engineering communities, the SRK taxonomy [79] has become a widely accepted framework for describing the various mechanisms that people have for processing information [90, 94].”
From Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations (1992) · cites this paper as [94]
In the citing paper
“The important point for the present discussion is that the psychological demands imposed by a given task depend on the level of skill of the operator [53, 68, 75, 941.”
From Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations (1992) · cites this paper as [94]
In the citing paper
“More experienced operators are able to deal with most task demands by relying on lower levels of cognitive control (cf. [ 1 8, 49, 68, 79, 89, 94]).”
From Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations (1992) · cites this paper as [94]
Citations
Cites
Engineering Psychology and Human Performance
Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G., Banbury, S. P., & Parasuraman, R. (2015) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315665177 · Cited by 5,017
Self-citationSelective attention and the organization of visual information.
Duncan, J. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.113.4.501 · Cited by 2,018
Cleveland, W. S. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,425
Pittenger, J. B., Kubovy, M., & Pomerantz, J. R. (1982) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422146 · Cited by 1,425
Engineering Psychology and Human Performance
Alluisi, E. A., & Morgan, B. B. (1976) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.27.020176.001513 · Cited by 1,204
Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing
Garner, W. R., & Felfoldy, G. L. (1970) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(70)90016-2 · Cited by 649
Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data
Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.229.4716.828 · Cited by 576
Monitoring Behavior and Supervisory Control
Sheridan, T. B., & Johannsen, G. (1976) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2523-9 · Cited by 479
Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.
Kahneman, D. J., & Chajczyk, D. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.9.4.497 · Cited by 449
Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures
Rasmussen, J., & Rouse, W. B. (1981) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-9230-3 · Cited by 439
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- BARNFTT B., 1986, Proceeding of the 30th Meeting of the Human Factors Socity, p435 439
- BOLES D. B., 1983, Engineering-Psychology Research Laboratory
- CASEY E. J., 1986, The effect of information correlation and display integrality
- CHERNIKOFF R., 1963, Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 66, 95
- CLEVELAND W. S., 1985, Science, 229, 828
- 10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.501 · DOI
- GOETTL B. P., 1986, Proceedings of the 30th Meeting of the Human Factors Society, 450
- 10.1037/0096-1523.9.4.497 · DOI
- KAHNEMAN D., 1984, In Varieties of Attention, 29
- 10.1037/0096-1523.9.4.510 · DOI
- PETERSON R. J., 1981, Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, 182
- POMERANTZ J. R., 1981, Perceptual Organization
- POLSON M., 1986, Adaptive Human-Machine Interfaces
- WICKENS C. D., 1986, Human Factors in Pschology
- WICKENS C. D., 1986, Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Psychology in the DOD, 324
- WOOD D., 1981, Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, 110
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations
Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.156574 · Cited by 1,084
The Proximity Compatibility Principle: Its Psychological Foundation and Relevance to Display Design
Wickens, C. D., & Carswell, C. M. (1995) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872095779049408 · Cited by 679
Self-citationReview of Graph Comprehension Research: Implications for Instruction
Shah, P., & Hoeffner, J. (2002) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1013180410169 · Cited by 431
Graphical Displays: Implications for Divided Attention, Focused Attention, and Problem Solving
Bennett, K. B., & Flach, J. (1992) · Human Factors · doi:10.1177/001872089203400502 · Cited by 332
Codes and Modalities in Multiple Resources: A Success and a Qualification
Wickens, C. D., & Liu, Y. (1988) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872088803000505 · Cited by 251
Self-citationShah, P., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (1999) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.690 · Cited by 235
Phansalkar, S., Edworthy, J., Hellier, E., Seger, D. L., Schedlbauer, A., Avery, A. J., & Bates, D. W. (2010) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2010.005264 · Cited by 226
Wickens, C. D., & Andre, A. D. (1990) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089003200105 · Cited by 216
Self-citationBar and Line Graph Comprehension: An Interaction of Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Processes
Shah, P., & Freedman, E. G. (2009) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01066.x · Cited by 186
Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs.
Shah, P., & Carpenter, P. A. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.43 · Cited by 172
Nowell, L., France, R. K., Hix, D., Heath, L. S., & Fox, E. A. (1996) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/243199.243214 · Cited by 135
Object displays do not always support better integrated task performance
Sanderson, P. M., Flach, J. M., Buttigieg, M. A., & Casey, E. J. (1989) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872088903100207 · Cited by 134
Bell, M. L., Hobbs, B. F., & Ellis, H. (2003) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0038-0121(02)00047-2 · Cited by 125
The Comprehension of Quantitative Information in Graphical Displays
Shah, P., Freedman, E. G., & Vekiri, I. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610448.012 · Cited by 125
A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies on Data Glyphs
Fuchs, J., Isenberg, P., Bezerianos, A., & Keim, D. A. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2016.2549018 · Cited by 117
Toward a Model of Knowledge-Based Graph Comprehension
Freedman, E. G., & Shah, P. (2002) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-46037-3_3 · Cited by 116
Emergent Features and Graphical Elements: Designing More Effective Configural Displays
Bennett, K. B., Toms, M. L., & Woods, D. (1993) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089303500105 · Cited by 125
Choosing Specifiers: An Evaluation of the Basic Tasks Model of Graphical Perception
Carswell, C. M. (1992) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089203400503 · Cited by 108
Wickens, C. D., & Carswell, C. M. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119636113.ch5 · Cited by 112
Self-citationGuidelines for Presenting Quantitative Data in HFES Publications
Gillan, D. J., Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G., & Carswell, C. M. (1998) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872098779480640 · Cited by 89
Self-citationEmergent Features in Visual Display Design for Two Types of Failure Detection Tasks
Buttigieg, M. A., & Sanderson, P. M. (1991) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089103300603 · Cited by 83
Judgments of Change and Proportion in Graphical Perception
Hollands, J. G., & Spence, I. (1992) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089203400306 · Cited by 74
Carswell, C. M., & Wickens, C. D. (1990) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03205980 · Cited by 70
Self-citationMaking the constraints visible: testing the ecological approach to interface design.
Effken, J., Kim, N.-G., & Shaw, R. E. (1997) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/001401397188341 · Cited by 75
Ali, N., & Peebles, D. (2012) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720812452592 · Cited by 66
Gurushanthaiah, K., Weinger, M. B., & Englund, C. E. (1995) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199512000-00009 · Cited by 64
Spatialization Design: Comparing Points and Landscapes
Tory, M. K., Sprague, D., Wu, F., So, W. Y., & Munzner, T. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2007.70596 · Cited by 63
Stimulus complexity and information integration in the spontaneous interpretations of line graphs
Carswell, C. M., Emery, C. D., & Lonon, A. M. (1993) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2350070407 · Cited by 62
Carswell, C. M., & Wickens, C. D. (1996) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872096778940750 · Cited by 58
Self-citationApplication of Cognitive Theory to Training and Design Solutions for Age-related Computer Use
Mead, S. E., Batsakes, P. J., Fisk, A. D., & Mykityshyn, A. L. (1999) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1080/016502599383694 · Cited by 57
Graphical encoding for information visualization: an empirical study
Nowell, L., Schulman, R. S., & Hix, D. (2003) · IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization · doi:10.1109/infvis.2002.1173146 · Cited by 57
Human-autonomy teaming interface design considerations for multi-unmanned vehicle control
Calhoun, G., Ruff, H., Behymer, K., & Frost, E. (2018) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2017.1315751 · Cited by 51
Coury, B. G., Boulette, M. D., & Smith, R. A. (1989) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872088903100505 · Cited by 50
The Effects of Discount Location and Frame on Consumers’ Price Estimates
DelVecchio, D. S., Lakshmanan, A., & Krishnan, H. S. (2009) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2009.05.010 · Cited by 47
Emergency signal failure: implications and recommendations
Bliss, J. P., & Gilson, R. D. (1998) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/001401398187323 · Cited by 44
Time Stress and the Processing of Visual Displays
Coury, B. G., & Boulette, M. D. (1992) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089203400605 · Cited by 44
Comparing Dot and Landscape Spatializations for Visual Memory Differences
Tory, M. K., Swindells, C., & Dreezer, R. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2009.127 · Cited by 43
Nowell, L. T., & Hix, D. (1997) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 43
Sanders, A. F. (1991) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139108964844 · Cited by 41
Resources, confusions, and compatibility in dual-axis tracking: Displays, controls, and dynamics.
Fracker, M. L., & Wickens, C. D. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.15.1.80 · Cited by 53
Self-citationIntegrated displays and the perception of graphical data
Goettl, B. P., Wickens, C. D., & Kramer, A. F. (1991) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139108964846 · Cited by 35
Self-citationAlphanumeric and graphic displays for dynamic process monitoring and control
Coury, B. G., & Pietras, C. M. (1989) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140138908966912 · Cited by 30
Graph Comprehension: The Role of Format, Content and Individual Differences
Shah, P. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0109-3_10 · Cited by 31
Measures of Information Complexity and the Implications for Automation Design
Xing, J. (2004) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e448532006-001 · Cited by 29
Testing Statistical Charts: What Makes a Good Graph?
VanderPlas, S., Cook, D., & Hofmann, H. (2020) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-031219-041252 · Cited by 28
16 Reading Graphs: Interactions of Processing Requirements and Stimulus Structure
Carswell, C. M. (1992) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61027-4 · Cited by 28
A research paradigm in human-robot interaction
Rahimi, M., & Karwowski, W. (1990) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0169-8141(90)90028-z · Cited by 26
Communicating the validity of structured job interviews with graphical visual aids
Zhang, D. C., Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12220 · Cited by 28
Marino, C. J., & Mahan, R. P. (2005) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/0018720053653758 · Cited by 25
The Display of Multivariate Information: An Experimental Study of an Information Integration Task
Jones, P. M., Wickens, C. D., & Deutsch, S. (1990) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0301_1 · Cited by 25
Self-citationThe Role of Presentation Format on Decision-makers’ Behaviour in Accounting
Ghani, E. K., Laswad, F., Tooley, S. T., & Jusoff, K. (2009) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v2n1p183 · Cited by 24
Goldstone, R. L., Pestilli, F., & Börner, K. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.012 · Cited by 23
Golparvar, S. E., & Abolhasani, H. (2022) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100644 · Cited by 22
The complex role of perceptual organization in visual display design theory.
Sanderson, P., Haskell, I., & Flach, J. M. (1992) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139208967390 · Cited by 25
Blasio, A. J., & Bisantz, A. (2002) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/s0169-8141(02)00074-4 · Cited by 26
Boote, S. K., & Boote, D. N. (2017) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/690204 · Cited by 21
Baber, C., Morar, N., & McCabe, F. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2019.2896838 · Cited by 13
A Model of the Cognitive and Perceptual Processes in Graphical Display Comprehension
Shah, P. (1997) · Cited by 19
The effect of emergent features on judgments of quantity in configural and separable displays.
Peebles, D. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.14.2.85 · Cited by 18
Workload and Stress in Vigilance: The Impact of Display Format and Task Type
Szalma, J. L. (2011) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.4.0441 · Cited by 18
Vigilance, Alarms, and Integrated Monitoring Systems
Weinger, M. B., & Berry, J. M. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-11237-6.00023-6 · Cited by 18
Curran, C. R. (1999) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/s0897-1897(99)80067-6 · Cited by 17
Designing Sonification for Effective Attentional Control in Complex Work Domains
Anderson, J. E., & Sanderson, P. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120404801606 · Cited by 17
Graphical Information Processing: The Effects of Proximity Compatibility
Carswell, C. M. (1990) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193129003401916 · Cited by 17
The effect of graph complexity and planning on graph writing performance and descriptive strategies
Golparvar, S. E., & Azizsahra, M. (2023) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12676 · Cited by 16
Task-dependent processing of tables and graphs
Porat, T., Oron-Gilad, T., & Meyer, J. (2008) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290701803516 · Cited by 16
The Efficacy of a Decision Support System in Enhancing Risk Assessment Performance
Song, Q., Chan, S. H., & Wright, A. M. (2016) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/deci.12225 · Cited by 16
Representation Aiding to Support Performance on Problem-Solving Tasks:
Smith, P. J., Bennett, K. B., & Stone, R. (2006) · Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics · doi:10.1177/1557234x0600200104 · Cited by 22
Proximity Compatibility and the Object Display
Wickens, C. D., & Andre, A. D. (1988) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193128803201906 · Cited by 16
Self-citationHuman factors analysis of power system visualizations
Overbye, T. J., Wiegmann, D. A., Rich, A. M., & Sun, Y. (2005) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2001.926263 · Cited by 15
The Bargraph as a Configural and a Separable Display
Coury, B. G., & Purcell, J. A. (1988) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193128803201912 · Cited by 15
Probing the mental models of system state categories with multidimensional scaling
Coury, B. G., Weiland, M. Z., & CuQlock-Knopp, V. G. (1992) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/0020-7373(92)90036-k · Cited by 14
Three Dimensional Display Technology for Aerospace and Visualization
Wickens, C. D., & Todd, S. J. (1990) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193129003401913 · Cited by 14
Self-citationUnusual Attitude Recoveries With a Spatial Disorientation Icon
Wickens, C. D., Self, B., Andre, T. S., Reynolds, T. J., & Small, R. L. (2007) · International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1080/10508410701328821 · Cited by 13
Self-citationSeparable and unitary stimuli in nonmetric multiple-cue probability learning
Edgell, S. E., & Morrissey, J. M. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90007-t · Cited by 13
Collaborative Decision Making in Dynamic Systems
Coury, B. G., & Terranova, M. (1991) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193129103501311 · Cited by 13
The effects of three statistical control charts on task performance
Ong, K. H., Harvey, C., Shehab, R. L., Dechert, J. D., & Darisipudi, A. (2004) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537280410001702137 · Cited by 12
Mixed versus Pure Display Format in Integration and Nonintegration Visual Display Monitoring Tasks
Payne, D. G., Lang, V. A., & Blackwell, J. M. (1995) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872095779049273 · Cited by 11
The Psychology of Human-Computer Mismatches
Reyna, V., Brainerd, C., Effken, J., Bootzin, R., & Lloyd, F. J. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012761891-3/50005-9 · Cited by 11
Incorporating the effect of display formats in cognitive modelling
GOH, S. K., & Coury, B. G. (1994) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139408963685 · Cited by 10
Morgan, P. L., Waldron, S. M., King, S. L., & Patrick, J. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73345-4_15 · Cited by 9
Multisensory Integration for Pilot Spatial Orientation
Small, R. L., Keller, J. W., Wickens, C. D., Socash, C. M., Ronan, A. M., & Fisher, A. M. (2006) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 9
Self-citationThe Effects of Invention and Recontextualization on Representing and Reasoning with Trees of Life
Matuk, C. F., & Uttal, D. H. (2018) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9761-4 · Cited by 9
Bechtel, W. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_27 · Cited by 9
A comparison of the augmented bar display and the object display
Elvers, G. C., & Dolan, N. J. (1995) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139508925149 · Cited by 8
Object displays and control of dynamic systems
Gillie, T., & Berry, D. (1994) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139408964956 · Cited by 14
Goldiez, B. F. (2004) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · Cited by 8
15 The Effects of Representation on the Processing of Probabilistic Information
Edgell, S. E., Bright, R. D., Ng, P. C., Noonan, T. K., & Ford, L. A. (1992) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61025-0 · Cited by 8
Adaptive Consoles for Supervisory Control of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Fuchs, C., Ferreira, A. S., de Sousa, J. B., & Gonçalves, G. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39330-3_73 · Cited by 7
Research-based Principles for Multimedia Presentation
Park, O.-C., & Etgen, M. P. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47584-7_11 · Cited by 7
Graph schema and best graph type to compare discrete groups: Bar, line, and pie
Zhao, F., & Gaschler, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991420 · Cited by 6
Parsons, L. M., & Tinkelman, D. P. (2012) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2012.09.001 · Cited by 7
Comparing 2D and 3D Displays for Trend Estimation: The Effects of Display Augmentation
Meserth, T. A., & Hollands, J. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193129904302310 · Cited by 7
Peripheral Polar-Graphic Displays for Signal/Failure Detection
Beringer, D. B., & Chrísman, S. E. (1991) · International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0102_4 · Cited by 7
Dolan, N. J., Elvers, G. C., & Schmidt, J. (1991) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193129103502036 · Cited by 7
Brown, T. ;. D. (1998) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e448772008-001 · Cited by 7
Moreira, J., Mendes, D., & Gonçalves, D. J. V. (2020) · International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI) · doi:10.1145/3399715.3399841 · Cited by 6
Sprawl decisions: A simulation and decision support tool for citizens and policy makers
O’Looney, J. A. (2001) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00088-0 · Cited by 6
Graph Comprehension: Difficulties, Individual Differences, and Instruction.
Greenberg, R. A. (2014) · Cited by 6
Danek, A. M., & Koubek, R. J. (1995) · International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing · doi:10.1002/hfm.4530050404 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Melody Carswell, C., & Wickens, C. D.
- Affiliations
- a Department of Psychology , University of Illinois , Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A.
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 511-527
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W1990041608
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 14.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- object display, bar charts, information integration, process control, time-varying information, task demands, display design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review