Emergent Features in Visual Display Design for Two Types of Failure Detection Tasks
Open accessAbstract
Visual display design for dynamic systems may be helped by exploiting emergent features that allow subjects to easily distinguish different states of the system. Three different types of displays were compared—two object displays and one separated display—each in a version that had a salient emergent feature that distinguished normal and failed states and in a version that did not have such an emergent feature. Subjects monitored for global and local failures simultaneously, which presented demands similar to integrated and separated tasks, respectively. Displays with salient emergent features supported superior global failure detection and may also have helped local failure detection. An object display with a salient emergent feature supported both types of failures better than or at least as well as the other displays. This advantage was attributed to the fact that the display had a salient emergent feature rather than to the fact that it was an object display. This research shows that emergent features can be effectively exploited to support tasks involving both integration of information and attention to individual data sources.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If functional relationships between subsystems are not explicitly represented in the display, operators tend to treat the subsystems as being independent of each other.
“Third, if functional relationships between subsystems are not explicitly represented in the display, operators tend to treat the subsystems as being independent of each other.”
From Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations (1992) · cites this paper as [93]
Cites
Melody Carswell, C., & Wickens, C. D. (1987) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140138708969741 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations
Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.156574 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
- Authors
- Buttigieg, M. A., & Sanderson, P. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 631-651
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W1951490636
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- emergent properties, display design, fault detection, dynamical systems, object display, information integration, state discrimination
- MeSH terms
- Data Display, Form Perception, Humans, Neurophysiology, Psychophysics, Task Performance and Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review