The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sources of variation in back and leg dynamometry
Abstract
Three investigations were carried out to examine the concurrent validity and the reliability of a portable dynamometer (Takei Kiki Kogyo) for the measurement of back and leg strength. First, leg extension strength of 19 subjects was measured using the Takei dynamometer and compared to the isometric knee extension strength of the dominant (right) leg measured using a computer-controlled dynamometer (Lido Active, Davis, CA). The back extension strength of 18 subjects was also compared between the two dynamometers. Second, back and leg strengths of 36 subjects, aged 19-30 years, were measured twice using the Takei dynamometer. Six days separated the test and retest. Third, back and leg strengths of four subjects, aged 21-30 years, were measured at six different times of the solar day. Significant relations (p < 0.001) were obtained between the Takei and Lido dynamometers for leg strength (r = 0.90) and back strength (r = 0.79). Significant test-retest correlations (p < 0.001) were found for leg strength (r = 0.80) and back strength (r = 0.91). Group mean (+/- SD) leg strength values of test (1450.4 +/- 428.6 N) and retest (1432.8 +/- 449.1 N) did not differ ((p > 0.05). A small (4.5%) but significant difference was found between the test (1057.2 +/- 309.9 N) and retest (1106.2 +/- 334.4 N) mean values for back strength (p < 0.05). A time of day effect was evident for back and leg strength (p < 0.05); on average the peak times occurred at 16:53 h and 18:20 h, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Circadian Variation in Sports Performance
Atkinson, G., & Reilly, T. (1996) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-199621040-00005 · Cited by 555
Self-citationCircadian rhythms and exercise — re-setting the clock in metabolic disease
Gabriel, B. M., & Zierath, J. R. (2019) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-018-0150-x · Cited by 382
Rahnama, N., Lees, A., & Bambaecichi, E. (2005) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130500101585 · Cited by 295
Gainey, A., Himathongkam, T., Tanaka, H., & Suksom, D. (2016) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2016.03.009 · Cited by 125
Test-retest reliability of isometric and isoinertial testing in symmetric and asymmetric lifting
HATTORI, Y., ONO, Y., SHIMAOKA, M., HIRUTA, S., MICHIHIRO, K., & TAKEUCHI, Y. (1998) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/001401398186595 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- COLDWELLS, A., ATKINSON, G., & REILLY, T.
- Venue
- Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-86
- ISSN
- 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5847
- OpenAlex
- W1997627509
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sources of variation in back and leg dynamometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00140139408963625
- The paper
- COLDWELLS, A., ATKINSON, G., & REILLY, T. (1994). Sources of variation in back and leg dynamometry. Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963625
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.