Cited by 202Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionEvacuation and Crowd DynamicsStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The influence of surface slope on human gait characteristics: a study of urban pedestrians walking on an inclined surface

SUN, JIE, WALTERS, MEGAN, SVENSSON, NOEL, LLOYD, DAVID·1996·Ergonomics

Abstract

Human locomotion on inclined surfaces has been little studied. This work investigated uphill and downhill walking of urban pedestrians on slopes of up to 9 degrees. During a 3-month period, the gait characteristics of 1200 female and 1200 male pedestrians were recorded as they traversed a ramp of naturally varying slope at Sydney's Circular Quay. Walking speed, cadence and step length were determined for each subject, and average population gait parameters, for each ramp angle, were also calculated. The most significant finding was that the pedestrians' step length was decreased during ramp descent. Since theoretical analysis concludes that a reduction in step length produces a reduction in the friction demand, a shortening of the stride length is probably a means of counteracting the higher friction demand that would otherwise be required at heel strike during downhill walking.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00140139608964489

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. FINLEY F. R., 1970, Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 51, 423
  2. FINLEY F. R., 1969, Archives of Physical Medine & Rehabilitation, 50, 140
  3. HARUHIKO S., 1990, Journal of Human Ergonomics, 19, 13
  4. KAWAMURA K., 1991, Acta Medica Okayama, 45, 179
  5. LLOYD D., 1989, Journal of Occupational Health and Safety in Australia and New Zealand, 5, 229
  6. MURRAY M. P., 1970, Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 51, 637

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
SUN, J., WALTERS, M., SVENSSON, N., & LLOYD, D.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Ergonomics
Published
1996-03
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
677-692
ISSN
  • 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5847
OpenAlex
W2080303183
Cited by
202
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 17
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of New South Wales
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Keywords
human walking, inclined surfaces, uphill walking, downhill walking, step length, walking speed, cadence, gait parameters, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Child, Female, Gait, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Urban Population, Walking, Friction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review